Hillary Clinton 'wants to hug Meghan over racist treatment'

Discussion in 'Latest US & World News' started by Peter Dow, Nov 12, 2019.

  1. Peter Dow

    Peter Dow Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    919
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    BBC: Hillary Clinton 'wants to hug Meghan over racist treatment'
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-50387004
    Hillary Clinton has said she wants to hug the Duchess of Sussex and "tell her to hang in there" over "racist" treatment.

    The former US presidential candidate said the way Meghan has been treated over the past three years has been "heartbreaking and wrong".

    What's "heartbreaking and wrong" is American support for the UK monarchy, while shunning republicans in the UK who are struggling for the rights of the people here to establish nation-state republics and elect presidents of our own!

    A video I produced in 2008 at the invitation of "Sean", an official of the US State Department.


    Why don't Hillary Clinton and Condoleezza Rice want to "hug" republicans, like me, in Britain over being subjugated by a kingdom and monarchy,

    [​IMG]
    Condolezza Rice shakes hands with the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, Mohammed bin Salman

    or hug Arabian republicans distressed over the dismemberment of Jamal Khashoggi in the Saudi Embassy, Istanbul?

    [​IMG]
    The late Jamal Khashoggi, butchered in the Saudi Embassy, Istanbul


    (In the case of Condi, that's a hug I've been waiting 12+ years to receive!)


    Do Americans have hugs only for members of foreign royal families, no hugs for foreign republicans and democrats, your most loyal allies? :-(
     
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2019
  2. 61falcon

    61falcon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    21,436
    Likes Received:
    12,227
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Believe me you wouldn't be doing yourselves any favors, look what we here in the USA have wound up with occupying our White House???
     
  3. ArmySoldier

    ArmySoldier Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2014
    Messages:
    32,222
    Likes Received:
    12,253
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Did you intend for this to make sense or did you accidentally delete a sentence...?
     
    roorooroo and vman12 like this.
  4. scarlet witch

    scarlet witch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2016
    Messages:
    11,951
    Likes Received:
    7,714
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    No one falls for the racist card anymore, you mess up you take responsibility... even if you're black
     
  5. Thedimon

    Thedimon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2018
    Messages:
    12,121
    Likes Received:
    8,714
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Your monarch is a ceremonial figure.
    You already have a prime minister who runs executive branch of government. The UK is a monarchy in name only.
    If you want to elect your PM directly then call your MP.
     
    AmericanNationalist likes this.
  6. ModCon

    ModCon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2016
    Messages:
    6,323
    Likes Received:
    9,931
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Don't forget a peck on the cheek.

    [​IMG]
     
  7. Jeannette

    Jeannette Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2012
    Messages:
    37,994
    Likes Received:
    7,948
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Meghan Markle is probably the only person in history who has snubbed the queen - and twice mind you. But oh yes, she was lovey dovy with the queen before the marriage. Typical! But then again she doesn't speak to her own father after he spent a fortune sending her to private schools and college. I can only imagine how hurt the queen must be, knowing she was deceived that way.

    If there is one good thing about Maghan Markle it's this. It made the queen realize what a gem they have in Kate - who has shown herself to be a lot more royal than the royals.
     
    James Knapp likes this.
  8. drluggit

    drluggit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    30,981
    Likes Received:
    28,443
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I just don't get it. Meghan is getting what virtually all celebs in the UK get, but hillary is butt hurt for her? Seriously? I think it's just another in a long line of "this is really what Hillary thinks" moments where you have to step back and say, wtf? and wonder why she is always willing to demonstrate her intolerance of those who actually are exercising their rights, not just the ones she wants folks to have.
     
    Blaster3 likes this.
  9. Peter Dow

    Peter Dow Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    919
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    Well I blame the BBC propaganda for setting the bar very low for head of state. Compared to the Queen as a UK head of state, President Trump looks brilliant as a US head of state!

    Everyone, almost, falls for the royal family member card. Royals get lots of sympathy when they deserve suspicion and hostility - for the royals part in the 9/11 terrorist attack on America and for the royals part in jihadi terrorism generally.



    The UK (neither the elected PM nor the ceremonial monarch) didn't warn the USA about the Arab royalists sponsorship of jihadi terrorism that led to the 9/11 terrorist attack - despite the fact that the American people are the best friends and allies of the British people.

    The UK doesn't like to warn the USA about the dangers of royal families - the BBC propaganda is always tying to brainwash Americans to believe the exact opposite, that allegedly "royal families can be trusted". :disbelief: That's false, there is no way that we can ever trust any royal family!

    I want to elect my president of my nation state directly - directly elect a Scottish President of a Scottish republic, but the UK forbids those Scots like me, who would like to do that, from doing that. Scots are under the UK's guns and can do very little to free ourselves, except complain about how Scottish democracy has been rigged and frustrated.

    Calling your MP of the Westminster Parliament is pointless because he or she can't do anything unless he or she gets majority support in the House of Commons, the support of the House of Lords and royal assent from the Queen, which she gives or not according to the advice she gets from her Privy Councillors, the UK elite.

    So there is no way that a Scottish MP can make progress at Westminster to winning a Scottish republic.

    The only way to win a Scottish republic is to ban the Queen and her family from Scotland, and call on any military (perhaps even the US military) to enforce the ban of the royal family from Scotland.

    If the American President would order the American military to enforce a ban of the UK royal family from Scotland then I and many other Scots would be very grateful!
    :applause::flagus:
    The Saudi royals are even more royal than the UK royals. Saudi Arabia is an absolute monarchy with no trace of democracy to be found anywhere in the kingdom.

    It was mostly Saudi money and Saudi volunteers in the 9/11 attack although Bin Laden and his terrorist training camp in Afghanistan had help from the Taliban and the Pakistani military.

    Whilst the Pakistani fascist dictator at the time, Pervez Musharraf, was a General, not a King of a royal family, he got payment for arming and training terrorists from the Saudis and other Arab kingdoms.

    Where the Queen is a threat is that the BBC brainwashes Americans to think that the Queen is nice, her royal family is nice, all royal families are nice, Americans should trust the Saudi royal family etc.

    As for me, I am just a republican and democrat writer whom the royals have not sent their goons to butcher yet, like they did Jamal Khashoggi, who was a Saudi writer who wrote for the Washington Post.

    [​IMG]

    The royals are a massive threat to our freedom and if readers here are turning a blind eye then the families of those killed in the 9/11 attacks are not.

    Trump Administration Turns Over Official’s Name Amid Dispute Over Saudi Role in 9/11 Attacks
    The limited disclosure, which follows pressure from victims’ families, comes amid strained U.S. relations with Riyadh

    WASHINGTON—The Trump administration turned over a key piece of new information to lawyers for 9/11 victims’ families, a move that could cast light on long-disputed reports of Saudi government involvement in the terrorist attacks.

    So it starts with a TV story about the UK royals but it ends with jihadi terrorists knocking your buildings down. Just be a bit careful about whom you want to hug is all.
     
    Last edited: Nov 14, 2019
    Tim15856, Blaster3 and scarlet witch like this.
  10. scarlet witch

    scarlet witch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2016
    Messages:
    11,951
    Likes Received:
    7,714
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Yes I admit as much as I detest the British elite I have a soft spot for Will and Kate and their adorable family... impossible to dislike
     
  11. straight ahead

    straight ahead Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2014
    Messages:
    5,647
    Likes Received:
    6,561
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm sure Hillary wants to hug her..... and lick her **** too.
     
  12. Moonglow

    Moonglow Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2013
    Messages:
    20,754
    Likes Received:
    8,047
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Have you ask if you can watch?
     
  13. straight ahead

    straight ahead Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2014
    Messages:
    5,647
    Likes Received:
    6,561
    Trophy Points:
    113
    :bleh:

    The only entertaining thing I want to watch Hillary do is fall down.
     
  14. Blaster3

    Blaster3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2018
    Messages:
    6,008
    Likes Received:
    5,302
    Trophy Points:
    113
    how could anyone trust an entity that throughout their entire history have invaded, thrust itself upon, and stole from, countless other lands/peoples/countries... by entity, i mean the likes of britain, france, & spain (lower case deliberate).

    as for the 'royal marckel' couple, f*** them too, celebs are worthless beings so i don't care what they think or do... neither should anyone else, imo
     
    Tim15856 likes this.
  15. Steady Pie

    Steady Pie Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2012
    Messages:
    24,506
    Likes Received:
    7,247
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Meghan's problem is that she's an insufferable bitch, not that she's black.
     
    Tim15856 likes this.
  16. Tim15856

    Tim15856 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2016
    Messages:
    7,792
    Likes Received:
    4,229
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    There goes my lunch.
     
    Moonglow likes this.
  17. Pipette8

    Pipette8 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2016
    Messages:
    2,952
    Likes Received:
    1,076
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Screw the hugs. Meghan is globalist stooge who is very busy trying to get people who don't worship her banned from social media platforms. She is the most deceptive, ridiculous, tranny ever. Hilary can hug that demon all she wants. Nothing about people's repulsion of Markle has to do with her race, or even her sexual preferences. It's about her deception (she's a tranny who faked a pregnancy for 10 months then presented a silicone doll as "baby archie"). It's about her standing amidst the poorest in South Africa and doing a documentary on how hard it is to be a royal. People aren't as nice to her as she thinks they should be she cries. There are lots of Brits who are questioning whether the monarchy is still relevant. Lots of calls for abolishment.
     
  18. Thedimon

    Thedimon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2018
    Messages:
    12,121
    Likes Received:
    8,714
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Just curious - why are you calling her a tranny?
     
  19. Richard Franks

    Richard Franks Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2019
    Messages:
    4,626
    Likes Received:
    1,473
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Hilary Clinton and Meghan Markle embracing wouldn't surprise in the least now that we're in the modern age. We have to accept this as a member of the human race. This is the sign of the times and there isn't anything wrong with it whether anyone likes this or not.
     
  20. James Knapp

    James Knapp Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2018
    Messages:
    888
    Likes Received:
    699
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes, we despise Meghan Markle in Britain.
     
  21. Thedimon

    Thedimon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2018
    Messages:
    12,121
    Likes Received:
    8,714
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Why?
    I find this publicity pretty strange from the US. Why is Markle being disliked?
     
  22. James Knapp

    James Knapp Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2018
    Messages:
    888
    Likes Received:
    699
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    She is not royal material. They should have a certain decorum and image in public. She chose to cry about a little bit of flack from the press which did not go down well with the general public, she also has a habit of spunking obscene amounts of money on things, publicly. She is responsible for turning the public against Harry and creating a divide between William and Harry.

    I'm not going to lie, she is also resented because she is dark and pretends to be some kind of champion for black people.
     
  23. Richard Franks

    Richard Franks Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2019
    Messages:
    4,626
    Likes Received:
    1,473
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The Royal Family didn't disown Harry, but they might as well disown Andrew
     
  24. Jeannette

    Jeannette Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2012
    Messages:
    37,994
    Likes Received:
    7,948
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Prince Andrew is stepping down. What bothers me is that I think all this media hype towards Andrew is to keep the public distracted from Bill Clinton's trips on the Lolita Express. According to one person I know, all that information which was once public knowledge, has now disappeared from google.

    Right now there's an investigation by Congress of the guards who were supposed to be protecting him, but it's doubtful they will get any information since they know it would be a death warrant for them - and probably their families as well.

    As for Epstein, he was an asset to the CIA as well as the Mossad - maybe even the MI6. No doubt he had information on our own politicians that could be used for blackmail, but also on foreign dignitaries. Prince Andrew is not the only one that fell for the entrapment. So then who killed him?
     
  25. Jeannette

    Jeannette Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2012
    Messages:
    37,994
    Likes Received:
    7,948
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Of course they despise Meghan Markle, that's to be expected. How can a British commoner accept an American from a social class as low and maybe even lower than their own, accept Meghan marrying their Prince, when they themselves would never even think of approaching him?

    That Markle considers herself equal to a Prince means she's delusional and totally self centered. To me she's a sociopath, which means she has no feelings and loyalty to anyone, and will only use people for what she can gain. This lack of loyalty was obvious with her indifference towards her father, when he had spent a fortune sending her to the best schools.

    To be honest, I can't help but wonder if there isn't a plan a foot among certain elites to destroy the British royal family, and Markle is being used as a tool towards that agenda - while Prince Andrew in turn became the most convenient scapegoat.
     

Share This Page