Time to stick a fork in it already.

You need to stop spamming the board. I gave you a substantive reply above. Dont be putting out 10 posts for the same conversation........It is obnoxious and confusing for anyone trying to read the thread.

 

So you honestly believe that you can impeach and remove a President based on anything less than irrefutable? LOL...really? Well there is your primary mistake in a nutshell.

You insisted upon a recitation of the "facts" and your retort was just that it doesn't have to be irrefutable? Lol.....wow. Thats just silly.

 

Probable cause has already been established in the Biden situation........ Meanwhile, Schiff is pounding sand.

 

"Joe Biden may potentially be a 2020 opponent, he CLEARLY was a prominent member of the past administration, whom happens to currently be under investigation by the sitting Attorney General."

He's being investigated by Barr? Would you mind proving that? Thx.

 

Now, the Trump Justice Department is investigating foreign government influence, VP Biden conflicts of interest, and possible corruption,

— Senator John Cornyn (@JohnCornyn) October 4, 2019

This is old news...

Kevin McCarthy stated that the DOJ has been interfacing with Ukraine investigators since well before July.

Trump actually asked for something different.... Crowdstrike and Shokin

If you read the transcript carefully, the part about Biden pointedly talked about coordinating what the Ukraine could share with Barr. Part of the situation can only be investigated in the Ukraine and in Cyprus.

 

What I said was that Barr is investigating the Obama administration, of whom Biden was a part. Barr has specifically stated that he is investigating the predicate for spying on Trump during the 2016 election and the origins of the Russian Collusion narrative.



https://www.npr.org/2019/11/09/7775...ey-general-trump-wanted-democrats-not-so-much

"As I said in my confirmation hearing, I am going to be reviewing both the genesis and the conduct of intelligence activities directed at the Trump campaign during 2016," Barr told a Senate committee.

Barr also said that he believed the Trump campaign had the target of "spying." What he wanted to determine, he said, was whether that so-called spying had been "adequately predicated."






Quite frankly, I am shocked that you seemingly do not already know this. Now you do. You are welcome.

 

You folks are shadow boxing, not one iota of real evidence of any wrong doing has been presented. This is becoming so pathetic its sad. The American people don't want to be bored to tears with nonsense that doesn't prove anything. If you want this thing to be legitimate you need the whistle blower on the stand Monday, otherwise its all smoke...

 

The FIREWALL is slowly being cleared away...


Do Democrats understand that when Yovanovitch acknowledged that she actually was coached, about what to say about Burisma and the Bidens, before her confirmation hearing took place that her testimony on 11-15-2019 actually adds evidence for the DOJ case against Biden?

 

I suspect that the whistleblower has already been contacted by the DOJ and has subsequently taken the, " 5TH. " Based on some of Lindsay Graham's recent comments, there is no need to invite the whistleblower to the Senate.

But it would be interesting to see how Schiff would try to spin the story about this whistleblower who supposedly has immunity.

 

Why would the American people buy into this farce if the whistle blower doesn't testify? Without the whistle blower this is just more liberal bullshit...

 

They are just beginning. Expect the news to get a whole lot worse for Fat Donnie.

 

In the the hearings so far, Schiff has been the alpha male. He has been very successful at keeping the Republican attack dogs in a box. He has been very successful at preventing the Republîcans from turning the hearings into a $#@& show.

However, Jim Jordan has been masterful at making himself out to be quite the fool. Woof woof woof,. Grrrr grrr woof woof grrrrr grrrr.

 

There is no harmony between what you see and what is actually happening.

 

More like the alpha idiot. Not one witness that can testify to any direct evidence of wrong doing. By Trump or anyone else except possibly themselves

 

You're right, Lee.

I mean, look at this media compilation about this Ukraine business. They say the walls are closing in.



...

No, wait, my bad, that was a compilation about the Mueller report.

 

Given that the whistleblower is basically little more than a rumor monger all he could add would be hearsay no more useful than the useless dreck we've already gotten.