BREAKING: Lisa Page sues DOJ, FBI over alleged privacy violations

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by BuckyBadger, Dec 10, 2019.

  1. Thought Criminal

    Thought Criminal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2017
    Messages:
    18,135
    Likes Received:
    13,224
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your post was in the form of a statement of fact. I'm not a mind-reader.

    Thanks for the clarification.

    From all appearances, your opinion is in error.
     
  2. Yulee

    Yulee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2016
    Messages:
    10,338
    Likes Received:
    6,379
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I’m never wrong
     
  3. LogNDog

    LogNDog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2015
    Messages:
    5,380
    Likes Received:
    6,546
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Actually she doesn't in this case. It was a govt issued phone for business use. As soon as she uses it for texts the texts were govt property.
     
    BuckyBadger likes this.
  4. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    150,177
    Likes Received:
    62,816
    Trophy Points:
    113
    guess we will see if the right cares about privacy rights
     
  5. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    150,177
    Likes Received:
    62,816
    Trophy Points:
    113
    that is a very good point, think your right

    also if the Trump children used personal email or the whatsup app for gov business, gives gov the right to access all those messages too
     
    Last edited: Dec 10, 2019
  6. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    150,177
    Likes Received:
    62,816
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I thought she was suing Trump for claiming they were lovers and Trump doing his fake orgasm act as President
     
    Last edited: Dec 10, 2019
  7. JET3534

    JET3534 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2014
    Messages:
    13,350
    Likes Received:
    11,517
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why would anyone think messages sent on a Government system are not the property of the Government?
     
  8. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    109,654
    Likes Received:
    37,411
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes but it doesn’t give them the right to leak them to the media.
     
  9. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    109,654
    Likes Received:
    37,411
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Of course they are. But the govts can’t leak them still.
     
  10. Thought Criminal

    Thought Criminal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2017
    Messages:
    18,135
    Likes Received:
    13,224
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That is fake news.

    Ivanka used her personal phone during the transition and before she got her government issued phone.
     
  11. BuckyBadger

    BuckyBadger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2018
    Messages:
    12,354
    Likes Received:
    11,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Guess who can declassify anything he wants including her texts! LOL

    [​IMG]
     
  12. Crownline

    Crownline Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2016
    Messages:
    6,472
    Likes Received:
    6,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Am I correct in understanding that the messages were sent and received on FBI cell phones? If so, I don’t see where she has a leg to stand on.
     
  13. BuckyBadger

    BuckyBadger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2018
    Messages:
    12,354
    Likes Received:
    11,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They was....
     
  14. dairyair

    dairyair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    78,717
    Likes Received:
    19,868
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes, the prez would have less privacy than a simple public servant.
     
  15. doombug

    doombug Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2012
    Messages:
    56,871
    Likes Received:
    22,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The Prez has executive privilege where as a lowl level employee would not.
     
  16. LogNDog

    LogNDog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2015
    Messages:
    5,380
    Likes Received:
    6,546
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Red herring. Can you stay on topic? You can start a thread about the Trumps use of emails and texts if you want. Nobody is stopping you. It's not what this thread is about.

    [​IMG]
     
    HB Surfer likes this.
  17. LogNDog

    LogNDog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2015
    Messages:
    5,380
    Likes Received:
    6,546
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The texts belong to the govt. They can do what they want with them. Lisa gave up her right to the texts when she used an official govt phone to send them.
     
  18. HB Surfer

    HB Surfer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    34,707
    Likes Received:
    21,899
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ... or conspiring against a U.S. President or Presidential candidate. She's a fool.
     
    drluggit likes this.
  19. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    109,654
    Likes Received:
    37,411
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Zero evidence, read the IG report
     
  20. Andrew Jackson

    Andrew Jackson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2016
    Messages:
    48,448
    Likes Received:
    32,203
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No worries, MG.

    Durham is gonna have half of the Dem. Party in Cuffs before Xmas.

    According to some guy at Reddit who referenced a now-deleted tweet from a suspended "I Love Trump" Twitter account.

    It HAS to be True.

    As far as the OP (and Lisa Page):

    Hopefully, this is settled to the satisfaction of all parties.
     
  21. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not if she was using Government owned hardware to do it.
     
    LogNDog likes this.
  22. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Last edited: Dec 11, 2019
    LogNDog and drluggit like this.
  23. drluggit

    drluggit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    30,981
    Likes Received:
    28,443
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOL... privacy from the media? Since when? And since when would you have so suddenly changed your mind about disclosure of information to the media? Utterly laughable. You herald leaked personal information all the time, and yet, suddenly, this is the moment, this is the bridge too far? This woman conducted an illicit affair with a married peer in her organization, the context and content of which is entirely captured because she was too arrogant and stupid to keep it off of her .gov device because she felt she wasn't ever going to get caught, or have her device transactions read. So, guess what, it was, and there is about zero legal reason that she could actually ever find her way into court given the agreements that she did, in fact, have to sign allowing the agency to use the information that she generated using their devices in any way that they wished.
     
  24. Egoboy

    Egoboy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2017
    Messages:
    44,763
    Likes Received:
    32,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Which doesn't include releasing that information to the media... during an open investigation

    Read her lawsuit... it's pretty interesting...
     
  25. drluggit

    drluggit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    30,981
    Likes Received:
    28,443
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The content was evidence of behavior and was collected by the agency that then failed to do anything, but was disclosed from as FOIA request and was subsequently published because, clearly, it disclosed the conspiracy within which she was involved. Bummer. If her suit claims that FOIA somehow harmed her, too bad.
     

Share This Page