Trump: “I Heard Peter Strzok Needed a Restraining Order to Keep Him Away from Lisa Page”

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by icehole3, Dec 11, 2019.

  1. edthecynic

    edthecynic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2014
    Messages:
    3,530
    Likes Received:
    1,025
    Trophy Points:
    113
    this one from "human scum" and pathological liar Tramp: No one will lose coverage. There will be insurance for everybody. Healthcare will be a lot less expensive for everyone — the government, consumers, providers.
     
  2. Steve N

    Steve N Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2015
    Messages:
    70,217
    Likes Received:
    89,727
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You make it sound like insurance is a human right. Insurance!
     
    ButterBalls likes this.
  3. edthecynic

    edthecynic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2014
    Messages:
    3,530
    Likes Received:
    1,025
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Health care is a human right.
     
  4. ButterBalls

    ButterBalls Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2016
    Messages:
    51,205
    Likes Received:
    37,552
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ya it's like living in a democrat world!!!!! :icon_picknose:
     
  5. Steve N

    Steve N Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2015
    Messages:
    70,217
    Likes Received:
    89,727
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Insurance is not. So all you have to do is find doctors willing to work for free or less money and have at it.

    By the way, can you show me where health care is a human right. The other day I heard either Sanders or Warren say high speed internet is also a human right.

    Do you know that if health care was really a human right a person would be able to walk into any doctor's office and demand to be cured of what ails them regardless of their ability to pay. You might want to talk to some doctors and see how they feel about working for free.
     
    ButterBalls likes this.
  6. ButterBalls

    ButterBalls Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2016
    Messages:
    51,205
    Likes Received:
    37,552
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And wasted here, well we on the right appreciate it so not a total waste anyway ;)
     
  7. ButterBalls

    ButterBalls Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2016
    Messages:
    51,205
    Likes Received:
    37,552
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Once in a blue moon a person of great communication skills comes along, showing a unmatched degree a keen and articulate command of the English language! Unfortunately we are still waiting for that person.. Until that shining star emerges Cut and Paste will just have to do I suppose :( ¯\_(º¸º)_/¯
     
    Last edited: Dec 11, 2019
  8. bx4

    bx4 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2016
    Messages:
    15,142
    Likes Received:
    12,518
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Except Trump has done it over 13,000 times since his inauguration. And all you guys can come up with for Obama is one broken promise. Not a lie, but a promise he wanted to keep but couldn't because the Republican Congress wouldn't let him.

    Lying = Trump. Trump = Lying.
     
  9. ButterBalls

    ButterBalls Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2016
    Messages:
    51,205
    Likes Received:
    37,552
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What's your problem? You could find one way to past a " "human scum" and pathological liar" in to your post? Come on bro, work with us here, when in the swamp chirp like the inhabitants ;)
     
    Last edited: Dec 11, 2019
  10. ButterBalls

    ButterBalls Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2016
    Messages:
    51,205
    Likes Received:
    37,552
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Is that a record?
     
  11. bx4

    bx4 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2016
    Messages:
    15,142
    Likes Received:
    12,518
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Trump is the biggest liar that has ever been president. By a YUGE margin. Yeah, he has the record for dishonesty. And you don't care.
     
  12. ButterBalls

    ButterBalls Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2016
    Messages:
    51,205
    Likes Received:
    37,552
    Trophy Points:
    113

    WINNING! Another damn record! :cheerleader::cheerleader::cheerleader::banana::applause::applause::applause:
     
  13. Steve N

    Steve N Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2015
    Messages:
    70,217
    Likes Received:
    89,727
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I dont think I’ve ever seen so many triggered left wing responses in one thread before.
     
    Hotdogr and ButterBalls like this.
  14. ButterBalls

    ButterBalls Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2016
    Messages:
    51,205
    Likes Received:
    37,552
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh I don't know, they all have that leftist influence and over the top hyperbolic mood they bring to the party ;)
     
  15. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,338
    Likes Received:
    39,002
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I totally condemn him for it, never liked his attacks on people, didn't vote for him because of some of them. I think this showed a lack of decorum. But that is his style, you hit him he's gonna hit you twice as hard back. And he has reason to be PI**ED at these two people for what they engaged in and the things they said about him. But I don't believe this type of rhetoric is good for anything especially if not true no matter how he couches it.

    I agree with Professor Turley

    "If this accusation is true, it is not actionable though it would still be in my view deeply and chillingly inappropriate.

    If it is false, the question is whether saying that he does not know if it is true is a real defense. This issue came up in the Seventh Circuit case of Wilkow v. Forbes where Judge Frank Easterbrook wrote:

    “In Illinois, a ‘statement of fact is not shielded from an action for defamation by being prefaced with the words ‘in my opinion,’ but if it is plain that the speaker is expressing a subjective view, an interpretation, a theory, conjecture, or surmise, rather than claiming to be in possession of objectively verifiable facts, the statement is not actionable.’”

    Here President Trump is saying that he “heard” that there was a restaining order but did not know whether it is true. That puts the statement (like so many) right on the line.

    If there was a restraining order, there is no liable legal course of action for Strzok on the speech. Once again, however, that attack should never have occurred. I cannot imagine the relevancy of this information even if true, but to make such a statement without knowing the truth only magnifies the deep concerns over such attacks by a president."
    https://jonathanturley.org/2019/12/...rbing-reference-to-alleged-restraining-order/
     
    Last edited: Dec 11, 2019

Share This Page