85 - 15

Every control on a lathe can be controlled, with the appropriate mechanical connections, with a stepper motor, a type of motor that is easily controlled with a computer. In order to use the stepper motors, electronic circuitry needs to be designed to interface them to a computer. If you read my earlier post carefully, you will see that I designed and built circuity to turn the lathe into a computer controlled machine. Not that I was making circuit boards with a lathe.

 

Thinking about this why did the USSR let republics leave on free will (with exception of gerogia ) yet one proclaims states can not leave on free will?

 

If you look behind the controls, there are circuit boards that control the lathe. That is what I was talking about, I designed and built the circuits that flash lights and beep on que.

 

I grew up with a lathe and bridge port in my fathers garage, I can feel steel to the thousandth of a inch with micrometers and calipers to the touch analog not digital

You cant make them with lathes and bridge ports

Its circuit boards and a soldering iron

 

Moi didn't bring up selling public State Lands.
Someone assumed the Federals was the protection from or should be involved with . . .
Moi advocated these Federally occupied lands be turned over to the States as is constitutional. And grazing on such lands is a State matter, not Federal.

 

Well, I think appls are part of our agricultural industry, which even as a whole doesn't creack the top 5 contriutors to our GDP.

I agree with you on automation. Manufacturing will continue to get more done with fewer and fewer employes, and with the average education of employees increasing, as the work will require greater and greater sophistication.

And, I totally agree that the concentration of wealth and income is going rampant. We need to be addressing that in seeral ways.

Failing to maximally educate our population is one way we reserve good jobs for the few.

 

You cant make them with lathes and bridge ports


Sure you can pay $100,000's of dollars in mass production of automation

 

What subject would you like to learn. I'm sure I can give you a link. For free.

 

It all financial heck we could automate every thing if we had 90 trillion dollars.

 

This isn't a management issue.

There is good coopertion between state and federal lands management.

Bundys didn't want better management.

They wanted to steal the land.

 

How did the general government become the owner of said land in the first place?

 

The Constitution gives the Supreme Court the power to determine what is and isn't Constitutional. This means that, regardless of the actual text, the Constitution says what the Supreme Court says it says. In Texas vs White the Supreme Court said that the Constitution doesn't allow to unilaterally secede. Since the Supreme Court said that the Constitution says it then the Constitution says it.

 

So you can't actually cite any language in the treaty. That's pretty much what I figured.

 

I don't quite understand what you are saying.

But, this isn't about taxes.

Industries are automating, because it is cheaper, more predictable, etc., than paying workers.

When US Steel returned, their plant produced steel using 1/10th the employees previously required.

Etc.

 

I'm sure that my machine intelligence can surpass your best efforts, as to accuracy, speed, and repeatability. Besides, I can go and do something else while the machine is doing all the work. It is the point of automation, to let the machines do the work.

 

I really want to know how one makes circuit boards with a lathe?

He or she would be a master magician

 

Will we had the technology in the 1980s to automate everything, ( my dad has many patients in automation as a design engineer)

The only problem was money.


We still do but many times paying a operator $15 bucks an hour to do what a robot and automation can do for an investment of $200,000 grand is futile

 

No, I can't, but I don't have to for it to be true that the Constitution doesn't allow states to unilaterally secede. Do you deny that the Supreme Court has the Constitutional power to determine what is and isn't Constitutional?

 

I still remember moving from Chicago and working at a plant in South Carolina and had to work on one of my dads machines, I guessed it worked well at first but was a bitch to fix.

Just like cars , I remember going into BMW for a factory shut down, a side job and looking at how they built them from the inside up

 

Is that what the constitution says? That the supreme court has the power to determine what is an isn't constitutional? Where does it say that in the treaty?

And we agree that the treaty contains no language that prohibits any of the several sovereign states from leaving the union into which they voluntarily entered?

 

Do you realize that the Supreme court can throw out old cases?

That's why the left is so afraid of Kavanaugh he could overturn Roe vs Wade.

 

We disagree. There is Federal occupation.
And you employed a "pivot"

I bet you remain unfamiliar with the Hammond Family Ranch persecution
under Bush, Jr and Obama now pardoned by Trump.

May YOU Achieve Ever Higher Platitudes.
​

 

I'm sorry about your shortcomings.

 

Federal occupation, what a hoot.

 

Exactly presidents have the power to ignore Supreme court opinions.


https://www.google.com/amp/s/consti...an-the-president-ignore-supreme-court-rulings