Schiff's FISA Memo was Riddled with LIES

Nope...they do contest each others version of the conversation, not the FBI's version, whatever that is. Do you have a link to this 'testimony' you say he gave?

So......Assange 'protests' he got it from Russia?

It seems there were 'Ruskies.'

 

Huh? Why are you mis-representing what I clearly posted?

 

Where did I misrepresent anything? You mean you do not accept anything from an anonymous source?

 

Yes, I have said that and made it quite plain.

I said:

And you misrepresented that as some sort of confession you thanked me for.

 

You claim to rely heavily on a verified source. Most sources these days are anonymous. So yes, you admitted to accepting anonymous sources.

 

By definition, a verified source can never be an anonymous source. Don't make an assertion about my posts that you cannot back up with linked proof, doombug.

 

Says who? If CNN uses an anonymous source and swears it is "verified" then you will believe it. Stop dancing around the obvious.

 

No, I will not believe their claim to verification. Stop making up crap.

 

I am not making anything up. You seem to be constantly defending yourself against being a leftist. I am just pointing out the mixed messages you are sending. I take you at your word when you say you are not a leftist but at the same time I can see how others might mistake you for a left wing hack. Of course I do not see you that way.

 

And none of them are in jail for issues concerning intelligence or Russia.

 

Barr is looking at Australian interference too. Have you been subpoenaed yet?

 

Schiff deserves to share a prison cell with Hillary!

 

Childish.

 

So the ends justify the means?

Catching a few ancillary bad actors totally justifies rogue spook agency operatives conducting spying operations on Presidential candidates?

I'm sure you'd feel exactly they same way if Trump had the FBI and the DOJ spying on Biden right now, wouldn't you? As long as they root out a few rotten apples in the end, it's totally justified, right?

 

Which had nothing to do with Russia or collusion but you already know that.

 

Interesting question, one which clearly, you have supported an accusation of criminality before using the same criteria.... just sayin...

 

Do you have an answer?

Did Schiff do anything ILLEGAL?

 

If he did not have a subpoena then he automatically broke the law.

 

Hmm.. colluding with a whistleblower does seems pretty shady. Lying to congress does have liability for sure... illegally obtaining a surveillance warrant has liability.. I think there's a list.. and it's growing.

 

But, what's LAWS were broken?

We aren't talking about "shady", etc.

Do you have an Exact Statute (and evidence, beyond "speculation") to back up your claim?

Or are you ADMITTING that Nothing Illegal occurred?

 

Gosh, you're thick...
18 U.S. Code § 1621
50 U.S. Code § 1801
18 U.S. Code CHAPTER 223

 

So you'd be fine with these same "legal" surveillance methods being used on any, or all, Democrat candidates right now?

If it's not illegal, then what possible objection could you have?

 

Are you serious?

Wow.

PS--Why haven't charges been filed?

This is (apparently) more egregious than 9/11.

 

Because Washington is always slow and loathe to hold their own accountable. While you're celebrating that, just know that that same lack of accountability is going to crush any and all attempts to impeach Trump.

It's a double-edged sword that cuts both ways, and the blade is now on the backswing.

Oh, and we know you'd throw every single swamp creature involved in this under the bus if it'd get you Trump's head in a basket, because you really don't give a fraction of a crap about protecting "your own" as you do care about bringing down Trump.

 

Desperate.