Joining a Militia?

jay runner · Dec 29, 2019

Arctor said: ↑

I'm guessing a armed 'militia' going against government would be a home terrorist group? The days are long gone when your constitution was written and times have changed vastly... what where once your civil SERVANTS - now have become your masters and any armed uprising would probably end in tears
Click to expand...

Tears?

therooster · Dec 29, 2019

Golem said: ↑

Yes. It meant not only that it was trained and disciplined by the State, and subject to militia laws and regulations of each State, but also that it had achieved a very high level of military competence through their training.

The Amicus Brief in the Heller case signed by the most prominent Linguists and Philologists in the country explains it thus...

"The use of the past participle “regulated” in that modifier suggests a militia that not only is “subject to” regulation under the militia laws, but also is in possession of the qualities that flow from participation in regular military exercises—orderliness, discipline, proficiency with arms, knowledge about maneuvers and so on."
https://www.americanbar.org/content...PetitionerAmCu3LinguisticsEnglishProfsnew.pdf
Click to expand...

Ridiculous, and we all know it . " SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED "

Log in or Sign up

Joining a Militia?

jay runner Banned

therooster Banned

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

Joining a Militia?

jay runner Banned

therooster Banned

Share This Page

Useful Searches