Trump impeachment: Ukraine launches investigation into 'spying' on former ambassador by US president

Yes, he can tell the Senate all about how Trump shouldn't be impeached because neither Abuse of Power nor Obstruction of Congress are mentioned in Lithuanian Law.

 

Let alone US law.

 

....swing and a miss

 

Of course it matters if she's a spy.

 

Or American law either.

 

I thought presidents had the right to remove ambassadors. This removal seems to have upset many on the left.

 

It's the same whining that we heard from James Comey on losing his job(which has since been MORE than justified by numerous accounts.). It doesn't matter if you're a Democrat or a Republican if you're in government: Do the DAMN job. If you don't, you get a pink slip.

Donald Trump's brought 9/5 life to Washington, whereas before they sucked wealth off of the people's expenses.

 

I cant say it's a shocker the usual far left players fell for this.

 

Did trump need to insult and threaten her?

 

The FBI visited the home of the GOP candidate involved in this attempt to spy on a US diplomat and Ukraine launched a criminal investigation.

Your move.

 

She is and was a US dipolmat.

 

LOL so when we respond to her lunacy by saying she didn't do a good job it's a threat. She sympathized with the previous government to the point the new government didn't want her and Trump REASSINGED her. Then she show's up crying about the new policy and being reassigned, of course Trump fired back. You dems used this lady as a pawn in a game she had ZERO to do with, wasn't told wasn't informed because the new UNCORUPT regime in Ukraine didn't like her because she was such an advocate for the CORRUPT Ukraine regime. This is what your side is down to and it is a joke and reeks of unhinged desperation designed to enhance liberal feelings of hate.

 

A possible crime is no more of a reality than a highly likely one. Next time read the OP

 

Trump does the right thing 99% of the time.

Trump says the right thing 50% of the time.

 

So, the best way to understand Trump is to look at what he does and not what he says.

 

Yes, that is my opinion.

 

So you're saying she can't possibly be a spy?

 

Somehow you think she can't be a spy?

 

Count me in too! Rudy on the stand as a Republican witness??? Priceless.

 

Anyone can be a spy, including Trump, Parnas, and Giuliani. In your conspiracy theory, who do you believe she is spying for? The US, Ukraine, or someone else?

 

If anything, democrats.

 

She IS a spy?

 

There is zero evidence in support of the notion that she favored one regime over the other and there is zero evidence to suggest that she was bad at her job. There is a whole host of evidence to support the claim that she was lied and smeared against by multiple Trump associates, lies that the State Department knew to be false at the time, and that the State Department refused to publicly defend her - going so far as to tell her that she needed to tweet something supportive of Trump if she wanted to keep her job. There is also evidence that people funneled illegal money into Trump's Super PAC while attempting to engage in a quid pro quo of obtaining dirt against Trump's political opponent in exchange for her dismissal.

And then, Trump personally bashed her privately - multiple times - and then bashed her publicly while she was testifying.

Trump did not "of course" need to fire back. He is a pathetic little bitch and he acted like such for the whole world to see.

 

I don't buy this argument because you are technically doing something when you choose to say something.