Schiff may have mischaracterized Parnas evidence, documents show

Putting Schiff in charge of the impeachment investigation (after temporarily ripping the rug out from under Nadler) just shows that Nancy is not the shrewd and calculated genius at politically-manipulative gamesmanship that she was in her younger years. She has completely lost touch and made some very poor tactical decisions since she's been Speaker. But, she will be 80 years old in a couple months. She should never have given shady Schiff more camera time as an Impeachment Manager.

 

"Selling out" involves some renumeration. Dersh is working on his own dime. That should tell you that his motives are pure.

BTW, he's right.

 

Oh Please, Trump lies so much only a fool would take anything he says for truth! All documents and witnesses should be at this trial. Enough of this BS!

 

I just don't know.

Yes, on the gullible, but I don't think that very many others do. I think that they know it's all lies, but just push it for political gain.

 

The man is getting a lot of tv time, and the man is an author who knows that his celebrity status adds to his appeal as a publishing author. He WAS a respected constitutional law professor. He is a jet setting celebrity author hitting the Fox and CNN news shows for attention every time he defends Trump or Israel, or a conservative cause.

 

Then bring Parnas as a witness, simple, let's hear directly from the source

and let's call Nunes to the stand too (can't believe Americans would elect this guy)

 

so we need more witnesses and docs to make sure we get the whole story, why is Trump blocking them?

the fact that Sondland donated 1 million toward Trump's campaign makes him more likely to lie for Trump

 

Let's be 100% clear, Schiff is a liar (Hypocrite as well) and has been lying almost nonstop since Trump was elected and sworn into office. Adam Schiff should be indicted and prosecuted for his attempt to destabilize and to overthrow a duly elected President.

 

I thought the evidence was overwhelming?

If so, then the already given evidence is enough for a conviction, right?

 

So overwhelming they don't actually have any and need witnesses to come forward so they can fish for some evidence of something anywhere to make their case.

 

The Senate is going to vote on witnesses later. Why is that such a problem for the left?