Julian Assange: "I'm Slowly Dying Here".

It is futile and frustrating to respond to uninformed posts.

 

Yes. He makes a statement and you can prove it wrong but he simply repeats the false statement as if he hasn't yet been told. If you ask him to account for himself he ignores the question and when you tire of the ridiculous side-stepping and irrelevant questions he then complains that you have not responded. The "futility of responding to uninformed posts" has reached its' limit. I have decided to shut him off entirely.

 

This is the first I have heard of this

https://twitter.com/MaxBlumenthal/status/1219709123752878080

Here is a link to the New York Post on this.
https://nypost.com/2020/01/21/ameri...greenwald-charged-with-cybercrimes-in-brazil/

 

So not a traitor to a specific country then?

 

Based on what evidence?

 

You didn't ask me any questions in this thread, so how the hell can I "side step" what isn't there? Meanwhile, you've proved HOPELESSLY INCAPABLE of defending your accusation that I am on a "crusade to hang Julian Assange on rape charges!"

 

No, it's just DIFFICULT for you to respond to CHALLENGING posts! You have not been able to say why if he is innocent,
he didn't agree to be questioned. Again, innocent people tend to want to clear their name.

 

LOL - What a crock...

 

Incredible sad development.

The assault on real investigative journalists must stop. I liked Greenwalk the most, more than Galloway or Hersh. I guess Laura Poitiers is next to be targeted.

What can we, regular Joes do? It seems everyone else accepts the brave new world, by ignorance, lack of interest or imagination.

 

All the average Joe can do about it is to avoid being silent about it. To object at every turn when propaganda and government talking points are repeated.

 

The same sort of evidence as given by women that Assange sexually assaulted
them.
In the computer case it is argued that Assange and Manning worked together to
crack computer codes for the purpose of theft.

Depends if that journalist crosses the line and steals information.
That law has never changed. So yeah, hacking for information is
treated as theft under common law. And it become seriously worse
when people have to die because of it.

 

And that due time can take years. Keeping Journalists in jail for years awaiting a trial is something we have seen in Turkey under Erdogan. And you're accepting that excuse without any qualms? What happens when that 'due time' is for you and your political agenda - that is unless you consider yourself invulnerable?

Don't! Arrogance is always a prelude to a fall. We've seen it too many times in history.

​

Take that you fools of misery.
for we as gods of lofty See
will never care for history.

For knowest you that we the wise,
will always delve in tricks and lies
so that we'll gainest what we prize.

That way we'll stand above you all,
and tower over big and small,
for 'god's' you know can never fall.

Oh yeah! - Jeannette
​

 

Gods can never fail?
Assange is a god to you.
His arrogance is admitted to even by his friends.

 

"Gods can never fall" ???
They can, you know.
Those young girls who went to work with Assange thought he was a god.
Exposing diplomatic cables and military documents made him a god because
this would somehow lead to a better world. Only it was selective material,
and names which Assange promised to redact were simply left, and material
turned out to be stolen. And then this god forced apart their legs and raped
them.

 

Julian is not in the USA..Nor is he being held in a gulag that do not exist in the US or Britain.

 

And you believe that Soros and the Washington ideologues one world order will be better? I see it no different than the Soviet Union. The enslavement of mankind is the same, and the same means are used to achieve it. The end will also be the same, with one major exception. The collapse will be after the war.

 

Assange has apparently been let out of solidarity and this apparently has something to do with other prisoners protesting how he was being treated.

 

What is this evidence that you are referring to?

 

Basically the reports of court cases in the media.
And leaks from the testimonies of the women he
raped. Assange took great offense at the leaking
of these allegations - it's a bit rich for someone
who is notorious for his own secrecy and privacy
yet denies it to others.

 

THIS is evidence? Surely you can't be serious.

 

I wasn't thee. I don't have any primary evidence. I took care to read the
leaked allegations against Assange out of a sense of revenge - I wanted
to know HIS private affairs.

 

Sorry, you wanted revenge?

 

Comparing Soros and Washing to the Soviet Union is about as gross an example
of Moral Equivalency as you can get. Stalin killed nearly a million of his own party
and about twenty million of his own people - including 25 people per every village
in the nation just to get the ball rolling. He AND Hitler began WWII, and without
Washington Stalin would not have stopped till he took England itself. And of course,
maybe another 25 people out of each English village too.

 

Yes, the kind of personal revenge in reading the private accounts of a man
who made his claim to fame on "exposing" others - including many people
who worked as agents in foreign countries.

 

Are Soros and the Washington ideologues the same?