Pam Bondi DROPS A MOAB ON Joe Biden and Son Hunter Biden at Senate Impeachment Trial

Long ago proven...December 18th...

 

So your OK with presidents soliciting help from Foreign leaders to win an election, and then lying about it to the American people ?

 

Then why ask Ukraine to investigate it ? Why not a investigation in the US ?

You literally just made my point. Thank you.

Nope....If Joe Biden did something ring, he SHOULD be investigated.....but by US law enforcement agencies.

Presumption ? Stevie Wonder can see thats what he was doing......

Then your not paying attention. His “defense” has changed the tune and are saying “its not an impeachable offense” over and over now that the Bolton accusation have seen the light of day.

We will know when they vote on allowing witness’ later this week....Polls show that the majority of Americans want them, and if the right votes against them, it will prove the sham that this is, and they will absolutely pay that penalty at the ballot box. The right has painted themselves into a corner now

 

See, even his attorney's have pivoted to the "Well so what if he did" defense.

There was no quid pro quo on the call but so what if he did
There was no quid pro quo behind the scenes but so what if he did
He didn't do it, but even though he did it is it really something he should be in trouble for?

 

As opposed to what was done in an attempt to prevent Donald Trump from being elected president of the united states?

 

Yes... since this president was directly involved... he was in fact one of the top drivers behind it, although I will concede he was willingly led by the nose by Rudy...

 

That’s too bad, because in a couple of decades younger Americans are going to judge Trump, Obama and Bush and the rest of us for spending the country into unspeakable debt and all the wonderful economic woes that come with it. That’s Trump’s legacy.

 

No, i am trusting the testimony of ambassador yovanovitch. Who said he was "cut from the same cloth."

 

Because it all went down in Ukraine.

Trump is a part of law enforcement didn't you know that? That is one of THE main jobs of the Executive Branch.

Since when can you read minds?

"changed the tune"? How would you know what their tune was to begin with? The Dems in the HoR never let them talk to any of the witnesses. Or are you trying to mind read again?

The vote isn't about allowing witnesses. Its about allowing additional witnesses outside of the ones that already testified in the House. Here, let a lawyer explain to you why introducing additional witnesses is problematic.

 

I can't wait to see those debates.

 

Dershowitz was incredible. Wonder how the dingbats Maxine Waters and Rep. Omar took it in. He probably lost them when he said he loves America and the Constitution.

 

And the first one with no crime alleged.

 

Bunk, it involves us because Trump, both in Ukraine and elsewhere, doesn't want to hand over our money to corrupt countries. He isn't the Swamp business as usual where once a nation gets our aid it just goes on forever, with no accountability.

So tell us where Dershowitz was wrong.

How is it different when Obama told the Russians he would have more flexibility after the 2012 election? That was him altering US policy in a way detrimental to the US for his own personal political gain.

 

And he will be forever acquitted. This sham will make his re-election all the more impressive.

 

I appreciate your opinion but you haven't posted any proof.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out what was going on and the lefts fervor to cover it up.

 

Reminds me of the Mueller investigation.

 

by that time we will be full blown socialist/communist hell hole of a country so it won't matter. Liberals will win in the long run. They control the brainwashing education system and the media. How about letting us enjoy 5 more years of America not being a communist hell hole. Don't worry! Your guys' sick twisted communist america fantasy will come true eventually and you guys will win. So do I care about the future at this point? nope! only the near future. Again, like i said, you guys will win, stop being greedy!

 

So the FACT that the EU nations, the World Bank and even the Ukrainian Parliament considered Shokin to be a corrupt liar is not "proof" to a loyal criminal IMPOTUS supporter says VOLUMES!

https://www.kyivpost.com/article/co...utor-general-shokin-410909.html?cn-reloaded=1

 

Are you OK with Presidents passing a healthcare takeover to win an election? Raising taxes on the highest earners to win an election? Issuing executive orders to with an election?

So you're against Presidents going after foreign corruption and insuring our taxpayer dollars are not used corruptly and pay for play scheme are not being sold by politically influential persons?

 

All I see here is propaganda.

 

Does the Impoundment Act say the money can be denied if other countries agree?

 

So if Ukraine will investigate trumps rival, that proves Ukraine isn’t corrupt and won’t misuse military aid?

 

Does it even apply to a treasury loan?

 

Real Americans are against Presidents going after their political opponents with foreign help in elections, yes.

 

It is morally or ethically corrupt to get a job because of their parents, heck a great number of college grads got started that way. That said, how is it illegal. Every Trump supporter that brings this up, has yet to make a case for what was illegal.

Note, please don't waste time and bandwidth by repeating.