Weather station in Antarctica records high of 65, the continent's hottest temperature ever

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by MrTLegal, Feb 10, 2020.

  1. guavaball

    guavaball Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2016
    Messages:
    12,203
    Likes Received:
    8,501
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That you still can't prove no matter how many times you spew the lie :)

    Thanks for taking out the source that proved your flat earther folks were lying about the 97%. You'll fit right in with them :)
     
  2. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh, it’s about the money ? That’s even funnier. Like, let’s not take care of the planet, it’s too expensive. It’s cheaper doing nothing and moving the habitual world inland. That’s much cheaper.....
     
    MrTLegal and Bowerbird like this.
  3. guavaball

    guavaball Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2016
    Messages:
    12,203
    Likes Received:
    8,501
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So you can't prove they were wrong. Just have the "nuh uh" argument followed by blind faith in government. Absolutely a democrat :)
     
  4. guavaball

    guavaball Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2016
    Messages:
    12,203
    Likes Received:
    8,501
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ah the classic flat earther argument. Don't believe in our dogma about man being the primary source of climate change you must hate the planet.

    This is where you guys always screw up. People can absolutely be against trash in our Oceans, soil contamination and pollution . Those are easily proven issues anyone can get behind.

    Of course the morons on your side who believe the mentally disabled child somehow never bring up the massive trash in the oceans are China the Philippines and other Eastern countries and that includes CO2 production but somehow you guys magically forget about that when you right your flat earther Paris accords that never address it.

    You lose the rational people when you blame humans as the primary cause of climate change. That's your downfall and you still haven't figured that out yet.
     
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2020
  5. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don’t have to show a thing, sport. Science has done that already. Btw, science doesn’t prove anything. It demonstrates. Thought you could use the help.
     
  6. DivineComedy

    DivineComedy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2011
    Messages:
    7,629
    Likes Received:
    841
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Supreme Court. I'm hoping scientists can come up with solutions despite America's stupidity of voting for this:

    "We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of [those that believe climate change is a Chinese hoax].” (Obama)
     
  7. guavaball

    guavaball Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2016
    Messages:
    12,203
    Likes Received:
    8,501
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOL And you can't prove your own flat earther claim about humans being the primary source of climate change no matter how many times I ask you :)
     
  8. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yup.....blind faith in science, education. And blind conservatives just stand around doing nothing while wetting their pants till they get the OK from Hannity.
     
    MrTLegal likes this.
  9. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You’re , hoping” . That and a vote for a party that defunds every attempt that science makes. Sounds like a plan.
     
  10. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How many times do you have to repeat...”I don’t know what AGW is” It’s the change in the rate, not just climate change. At least make the statement correctly. .
     
  11. guavaball

    guavaball Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2016
    Messages:
    12,203
    Likes Received:
    8,501
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No matter how many times they lie to you, no matter how many predictions they get wrong you still lap up their dogma. Sad but predictable.

    I've even shown you the evidence they lied to you about the studies and what was your response? Was their science behind your denial? Of course not. Just the 4th grade level "nuh uh" argument.

    What's next for you? Rounding up some rational folks and burning them at the stake for not accepting your dogma?

    You guys are exactly like the Church when they went after Aristotle for having the audacity to claim the earth is not the center of the universe.
     
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2020
  12. guavaball

    guavaball Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2016
    Messages:
    12,203
    Likes Received:
    8,501
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOL No you were the one who said which of course you removed from your quote " It’s about the increase in the rate of change faster then our species can adapt. "

    And you still haven't proven that so matter how many tantrums you throw :)
     
  13. DivineComedy

    DivineComedy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2011
    Messages:
    7,629
    Likes Received:
    841
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wow, I didn't realize Republicans had dictatorial control of the entire planet and every corporation...
     
  14. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Look at their deficit. That defunds everything.
     
  15. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don’t have to prove anything. I’ll just sit back and let your totally uninformed comments speak for you.
     
    MrTLegal likes this.
  16. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Proven what ? Climate change or rate of change faster then our species can adapt. Which are you talking about.
     
    MrTLegal likes this.
  17. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What point do you think I have failed to prove?
     
  18. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well. You just waisted a lot of “ink.“ I’d prove my point just referring you to NASA
     
    EarthSky likes this.
  19. DivineComedy

    DivineComedy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2011
    Messages:
    7,629
    Likes Received:
    841
    Trophy Points:
    113
    https://vpr.harvard.edu/internal-funding-opportunities-1

    Our deficit went up linearly after the Budget and Impound Control act, but none of what our deficit is has any effect on Australian...scientists or Stealth: https://stealthelectricbikes.com/

    "Zero Motorcycles’ 100% electric powertrain significantly reduces CO2 and noxious fumes emissions while also saving oil reserves."https://www.zeromotorcycles.com/environment/

    EVen the hated company of Trump still has the Livewire, although we want smaller; shame they are planning on building small less than 400cc bikes only for Asian markets though.

    When we brought up nuclear, "liberals" freaked totally out, when we brought up wind, "liberals" complained of bird strikes...
     
  20. DivineComedy

    DivineComedy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2011
    Messages:
    7,629
    Likes Received:
    841
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sorry, it was defunded, link there is now dead along with NOAA and National Science Foundation...
     
    guavaball likes this.
  21. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You should ask him to provide an example of the type or amount of proof which would convince him to accept the opinions of the scientific community.

    He has, as yet, failed to even give me one such example- even a hypothetical example.
     
    dagosa likes this.
  22. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It’s the typical selective rant of a few chosen people with credentials to spread their disinformation. I have no interest reading the repeated drivel

    Science is built over time on the back of institutions which collectively represent the work of thousands in the climate and related fields. It’s silly to post several people’s opinion when all we have to do is look at the institutional work of ...NASA for example which simply gives the agreed upon work of hundreds. He gives several names, I say NASA. He’s immediacy our numbered several hundred to one.

    He can’t find one descending collective opinion in anyone of the hundreds of universities world wide., any government or any major corporation. Yet, the gop insist upon being the only entity in the world that disagrees. It’s scary until you realize their donors pay for their legislation.
     
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2020
    EarthSky and MrTLegal like this.
  23. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Really, being from what appears to be a limited science background, he does not even correctly define what AGW is about nor is there any repeated reference to it in any of his comments. Not even being able to correctly define the climate change debate makes anything you say after that, immaterial.
     
    EarthSky and MrTLegal like this.
  24. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It is and the reason I ask people like him to provide an example of such proof is because I am really trying to get at another question: Namely, is it even possible to convince them to have a different opinion?

    I learned long ago that someone who says they will never change their mind is unworthy of my time and effort.
     
    dagosa likes this.
  25. guavaball

    guavaball Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2016
    Messages:
    12,203
    Likes Received:
    8,501
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh my God could it get more delicious than this level of hypocrisy.

    Your statement in the OP:

    Global Warming is very real and humans are the most significant cause.


    And no matter how many times you have failed to back this flat earth science up with actual proven facts you have never admitted even that you could be wrong let alone that you laughably are.
     

Share This Page