You need to listen to Fox News to actually get it!

No. But there are proofs that 2+2=5.

 

If you cannot figure it out for yourself ..,,

 

That’s hilarious. Where did you cut and paste that garbage from.

 

Rather than spewing the same lines...why don't you refute any of the information we post? Do you rely on any other sources than Fox News?

 

So you admit you have nothing to say. Predictable.

 

Ah! So you admit the WWW DOES indeed have some truthful information. Now you're making progress!

 

No. Trump will win because the elections are rigged to favor pro-establishment candidates. Bernie is not pro-establishment. The DNC doesn't even want Bernie because he's a threat to the decades long govt-corporate love affair.

Already debunked.

She did win...but the electoral college stole the people's vote & betrayed the people's will.

Citations please.

 

Because it's inaccurate. I have no interest in wasting my time refuting it.

 

Again no names. Again no acknowledgement of political reality. Again no understanding of the fundamentals of economics. Again no understanding of the electoral college. Again no interest in the truth about wage increases. You are on a roll.

 

Reich is a joke. His economic theories (btw, he is not an economist) are wacko.

Reich uses his F- economics to conclude that “the only way back to a buoyant economy is through a productive system whose gains are more widely shared.”

https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulro...mics-false-facts-false-theories/#7f51e25a507a

 

Next time you make a claim, include citations/links or I won't bother responding. Every claim you've made thus far I've (and others have) debunked through simple web searches. So either provide documentation of your claims or be dismissed. Thanks.

 

Then prove it. Saying "it's inaccurate" is not proof. Show me the basis for your argument.

 

This was obviously written by someone who is anti-socialist & pro-corporation (as would be expected from forbes magazine). The same author would give Bernie an "F-minus". Both Bernie & Reich have solid ideas based on real-world systems that work in nations all over the world (particularly European nations). Plus, FDR, Eisenhower, Truman, JFK, LBJ and others were as (if not more) socialist as Bernie.

 

Reich...a Rhodes Scholar. Cool! Smart dude who has the ability certainly to understand economics even though he was trained as a lawyer. After all he did serve as labor secretary...so certainly he's had a lot of exposure to the how real-world economics works.

With that said...I challenge you to refute anything item he said in that video I posted about taxing the rich.

 

Then you aren’t paying attention

 

Nope common sense

 

People have short memories. During the Republican primaries Trump and Fox News did not get along with one another Trump even boycotted a Fox News debate.

 

And again no names of people who have been denied the right to vote.

 

It was written by an economist. Reich is not (obviously) and economist.

You've gone off the rails there. Ike was a socialist. He just defeated one of the most "successful" socialists in history.

 

I've proven it to myself.

 

Sweden does not tax the rich as much as Obama did.

 

Garbage propaganda is the answer to all your questions.

 

Which is almost more than the new inflation we have LOL. The worst inequality and upward mobility in our history is not trivia.

 

That is absolutely ridiculous. Obama was never able to raise the top rate or get rid of the loopholes. Totally obstructed. you know less than nothing after all those years listening to Fox or whatever....

 

Yowzer. The Russians are at it again.