Woman Accuses Joe Biden Of Sexual Assault

The sarcasm of the headline escapes you? Biden told US he believes all women and WE SHOULD TOO. So does that apply here. The Left/Dems/MSM said Kavanugh had to prove his innocence.

"Former Vice President Joe Biden is praising senators for delaying further action on Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination until the FBI can investigate charges of sexual misconduct.

Biden says Christine Blasey Ford, who accused Kavanaugh of sexual assault, “gave courageous, credible and powerful testimony” before the Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday. He says he believed Ford and “the country believed her.”

He says Ford “deserves an FBI investigation today.”"
https://apnews.com/6cd0cc2774d94da6...st:-Biden-hails-Ford's-'courageous'-testimony

"Former Vice President Joe Biden argued explicitly for this standard whenever allegations involve prominent men. "You've got to start off with the presumption that at least the essence of what she's talking about is real," Biden told reporters on Monday, "whether or not she forgets facts, whether or not it's been made worse or better over time.""
https://theweek.com/articles/796645/brett-kavanaugh-americas-vanishing-presumption-innocence

So double standard time for Biden now? Where is the FBI investigation? Ms. Reade seems to have given a courageous, credible and powerful statement.

 

Could be a good out for Dems to ditch their dog of a candidate.

 

You should. But you didn't in the case of Kavanaugh, or Roy Moore, or the ... over a dozen women who came forward denouncing Trump. In fact, the right cheered when their senators shut down investigations in the Kavanaugh case. Leaving any Republicans who did not demand at the time that the investigations continue with no moral authority to have any say on any of this.

So you can relax. We're not talking about the party of Trump. Adults will take a look at it and decide. The Democratic Party might not be perfect, but the democratic base doesn't "cheer" when an investigation for wrongful acts is blocked using technicalities because they don't want to know the facts, like the Republican base does.

 

I believe in evidence, Biden as I cited said otherwise. Why doesn't it apply to him? Kavanaugh and Moore accusors had no evidence and you believed them how about Ms. Reade? Why don't you apply Biden to your same standard?

 

The left gives Roman Polanski awards and it wasn’t really rape-rape. They put Harvey Milk on a stamp and name schools after MLK.

 

Believe women... as long as it doesn't threaten your tax status.

Where is Alyssa Milano and all the feminists on this?

 

AJ, here is a top leftist, from a leftist media source talking all about it...

 

And many illegal alien votes.

 

You don't believe in investigating.

I have not stated what I believe or don't believe, but what I believe applies to everybody the same. I am not you.

 

Sure I believe in investigating so let's have the FBI investigate Ms. Reade's allegation don't you agree? Biden has stated what should be believed why doesn't that standard apply to him? You believe Prof. Ford's statement without evidence the Moore accusers had no evidence and you believed them, why not here?

 

WELL DUH, the MSM of course will try to cover it up rather than as with a Republican all women are to be believed.

 

What the hell are you telling me that for? I'm not "the left"? Nobody is "the left" "The left" doesn't give awards.

What nonsense!

 

We care because all we want is to see democrat female politicians line up in front of the cameras one by one and claim they believe her "because it's true" like they did for Ford. Where are they? They give zero credibility to the me too movement.

 

Sorry.... too late. If you had said the same about all the Kavanaugh victims, then you might have had some moral authority.

Now you missed the "consistency" boat.

But hey... you can always try for the "purely partisan" lifeboat. And something tells me you might be kicking women and children out of the way, if necessary to make sure you have a place on that one, right?

 

What was there to investigate?

Was there a time to investigate? No.
Was there a place to investigate? No.

Was there people to ask questions to.. Yes... Did they back up Ford.. No.. These are the people SHE named btw.

 

Why Didn’t Jimmy Kimmel Ask Joe Biden About His Sexual Assault Accuser, Former Staffer Tara Reade?

To ask the question is to answer it.

 

I noticed that-just another softball interview about baseball caps.

 

Too late? It just started we had the FBI investigation in the Fords totally unsupported and refuted allegations. Time to get this one started don't you think? I did say the same about the Kavanaugh accusers I wanted it investigated and then they charged with making false allegations. Remember

Another Kavanaugh accuser admits to fabricating rape story
One of Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh’s accusers admitted this week that she made up her lurid tale of a backseat car rape, saying it “was a tactic” to try to derail the judge’s confirmation to the Supreme Court.

Sen. Charles E. Grassley, chairman of the Judiciary Committee
revealed the fraud in a
letter to the FBI and Justice Department Friday, asking them to prosecute Judy Munro-Leighton for lying to and obstructing Congress.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/nov/3/another-kavanaugh-accuser-admits-fabricating-rape-/

So now it's Biden don't you want it investigated? If she's lying let's find out. You guys said Kavanaugh had to prove his innocence well then let Biden respond and prove he is innocent.

 

Remember "credibly accused"? We heard that phrase a lot during the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation hearings in 2018. After Harvey Weinstein's downfall the previous year, "credibly accused" came to be applied to almost any accusation of sexual assault, no matter how incredible. The Democrats convinced themselves that the increasingly insane accusations against Kavanaugh were true, because they were highly motivated to do so. They wanted to keep him off the Supreme Court because they thought he was going to take away any possibility of their one big dream: state-sponsored abortion on demand.

By the standard our friends on the left have established, presumptive Democratic nominee and ambulatory cadaver Joe Biden has now been credibly accused of sexual assault by a former staffer named Tara Reade.

If you're not sure whether to believe Reade, here's what an expert told us just 18 months ago:



Okay, Joe.

Reade sounds credible to me. Unlike Christine Blasey Ford and Kavanaugh's other accusers, Reade just told the world exactly when and where the alleged assault by Joe Biden happened. So it's falsifiable. There are specific details that can be verified or debunked. There are potential witnesses who can verify whether she and Biden were both there. It's possible to know one way or another whether she was in that place at that time, if any reporters care to check her story.

And also unlike Christine Blasey Ford, Democrats don't seem to care. Or at least Democratic Party operative television comedian Jimmy Kimmel certainly doesn't.

 

People are actually considering taking the word of a Putin-Loving Russian Plant?

Wow. I have heard it all. :smh:

Reade called Putin “a compassionate, caring, visionary leader” and said, “To President Putin, I say keep your eyes to the beautiful future and maybe, just maybe America will come to see Russia as I do, with eyes of love.”

In the same post, she wrote that she left government work in her 20s in part because “I love Russia with all my heart” and “I could not stand to watch the deception and xenophobia that came from my own American government.”

People are actually taking the "word" of this Russian Plant seriously? Wow. :smh:

 

So let's start the investigation

"Indeed, to understand how to proceed, the media has only to take the advice of Biden, who two years ago argued that society had an obligation to presume that women who come forward with allegations of sexual assault should be believed irrespective of how flimsy that accusations may be:

For a woman to come forward in the glaring lights of focus, nationally, you’ve got to start off with the presumption that at least the essence of what she’s talking about is real, whether or not she forgets facts, whether or not it’s been made worse or better over time.

Democrats should also be following this advice. Back in 2018, you will remember hearing the party arguing incessantly that “due process” was only a legal right, and that it was inoperative in Kavanaugh’s case because a Supreme Court hearing was nothing more than a “job interview.” Well, so is the presidency. A presidential election is just a job interview with the American voter. There are plenty of other candidates, no doubt, willing to take Biden’s place in the race. In fact, one major candidate is still in the race. (Granted, Bernie Sanders once wrote a creepy essay describing the sensuality of rape, but let’s set that aside for now.)

During the Kavanaugh hearings, Jeffrey Toobin, CNN’s “chief legal analyst,” noted that “40 percent of the Republican appointees to the Supreme Court have been credibly accused of sexual misconduct.” Using this standard, if Biden wins in November, we will be able to say that two of the last three Democrats in office have been “credibly accused of sexual misconduct.”
https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/03/will-biden-live-up-to-his-own-principles/

 

So I take it your're not voting for Sanders who said even more glorious things about Russia back then. It's OK now to sexual assault women as long as they like Russia?

Let's investigate and expose Putin.

 

Could be their new plan seeing how his dementia is getting worse

 

I don't see why holding Biden to HIS OWN standards is a problem.

 

You don't even know that?

Ok... that puts this at the same level as your claim about chloroquine phosphate, in the category of things you discuss without knowing anything about. I wasted too much time on that one to find out on that one. At least here you confess that you don't know even the most basic facts about the matter at the very start.

Thanks anyway.