Then I will definitely just stick to saying handguns and revolvers and single bullet hunting rifles so prevent a loophole.
That as a pistol, is defined as a handgun, your stuck, and you cannot back out without admitting you know nothing about guns.
Demonstrating a complete ignorance of how the legal system within the united states works. Thus demonstrating no legitimate reason to be seeking a position within the government.
The united state supreme court has already ruled that such a move is unconstitutional under any standard of scrutiny. The technology spans three different centuries.
Folks here we have a perfect example of a classic anti-gunner, if he doesn't know how to describe something, he falls back on banning everything, never fall for it and never accept any compromises from the anti-gun crowd, fight em at every turn and work hard on passing laws that will make what they are trying to do a treasonous act and punishable with long prison sentences.
It is the fault of the pro gunners who instead of accepting what the law is trying to do, refuses to stop skirting the law and thus requires broader definitions. Even when trying to give leeway by allowing handguns that were semi automatic that look like the hand guns most police have on their hip, pro gunners come back with "this thing that is clearly not what you meant is a hand gun and thus allowed under your legal definition and thus we will use it" But yeah if pro gunners acted like the corporations in the 1930s who instead of trying to find loopholes changed their business practices to the spirit of the law then this would not be an issue.
So you would have no intention of upholding the Constitution and protecting the rights of your constituents? Shameful...
I will uphold the constitution just leaving out the second amendment. Infact, I will try to pass a bill calling for a convention of states to repeal the second amendment to get the ball rolling. Section 1- The second amendment is hereby repealed Section 2- The States shall have the full power to regulate all weapons within their borders, and the judicial authority of the United States shall not construe the meaning of natural rights or the right to self defense to strike down any state regulation of weapons. Section 3- This amendment shall not be construed affect the constitution of any of the several states.
Because the murder rate in the US is 4.5 times higher than any other European nation or Eurocentric nation. CA/AU/NZ
That amendment would repeal all federal regulations inside the states meaning the feds could only regulate the movement of firearms across state lines.
I'm still waiting for those US firearm homicide statistics that I asked for where we exclude gun violence associated with gangs and criminals. I wonder why that hasn't been presented yet.
Leave the discussion. There is nothing more that can be said on the part of yourself, as everything being uttered is nonsense, dishonesty, and a raging support for totalitarianism.
Because it is made up to fit the anti-gun narrative and totally untrue, but I have come to expect nothing less from the anti-gun crowd. To them facts don't matter only getting their way counts.
Then you are unfit to serve in any public office, in order to serve you must accept the entire Constitution, you cannot pick and choose what parts you are will to uphold and protect. And if you were elected that would be grounds to be impeached from office before you get to file a single bill. Bye, bye.
So i can't go elk hunting in Montana?? Here is a compromise. You and the government keep your nose out of my business and i don't revolk my concent to be governed which also is my right.