Biden Accuser Tara Reade Reportedly Canceled Fox News Sunday Interview ‘Abruptly’

The woman accusing former Vice President Joe Biden of sexual assault, Tara Reade, reportedly cancelled a planned appearance on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace “abruptly.”

“We never confirmed the interview or the New York Times story and we don’t provide details on the booking process,” a Fox News spokesperson told Mediaite when reached for comment.

https://www.mediaite.com/tv/biden-a...-canceled-fox-news-sunday-interview-abruptly/

Hmmm...

Tara Reade backed down from the Fox Interview.

Most likely because she couldn't withstand the increased scrutiny now that Biden has denied it.

Not a good look if she actually wanted to be believed.

Maybe she is waiting for a Million Dollar offer from Oprah for Election Eve?

Thoughts?

 

She deserves a big paycheck after being raped by Joe.

Number corroborating her story now up to five, which is five more than the liar Ford had.

 

Attacking the victim: Despicable

Democrats: No friends of women

 

Fox didnt confirm nor was any evidence shown she ever agreed to appear. Could be true, could also be victim smearing from a media already proven to be friendly to biden

 

"corroborating"?

By what definition?

I told 5 people that I saw Bat Boy, and they are "corroborating" my story.

And, I claimed (through hearsay) that somebody (that I claimed was my mother) called a TV show and "corroborated" my Bat Boy story.

 

This isn’t corroboration.

“The second friend met Reade more than a decade after the alleged incident and confirmed that Reade had a conversation with them in 2007 or 2008 about allegedly experiencing sexual harassment from Biden while working in his Senate office.”

 

I love the left. Now they have completely reversed the position they took during the Kavanaugh hearings.

 

How is that not corroboration? Compare to Ford, who didn't have one person backing up her story. Reade is a Democrat, she had no motivation to damage Biden other than the truth, and no clue he'd be running for POTUS some day.

 

The contrast between Reade's treatment by the Democrats vs Two Door Ford's?

Telling.

Democrat Party: R.I.P.

 

There is only one position, and that's justice.

Ford was believable. Reade is not ( so far, I'll wait to hear her testimony, providing all of the 25 women who accuse Trump, testify as well ).

Moreover, my assessment that Kavanaugh was not worthy of a seat on the Supreme Court had a lot more to do with his petty partisan rant, one that is wholly unbecoming of someone applying for the highest judgeship in the land, during the Senate confirmation hearing.

 

He was the VP. That seems like a pretty sweet story to tell some newbies your trying to impress.

Why can’t she tell the same story twice?

Why did she go in damage control when Biden agreed to let the Senate Secretary share any complaints during his time in the Senate?

Why in 2017 was she supportive of her supposed “rapist”.

 

Ford was believable if she knew when it happened, where it happened, who was there, how did she get there, how did she get home, not one witness, nothing, nada, zilch.

 

Bizarre and nonsensical.

Was she? Isn't she?

Utter nonsense; his *rant* was the result of a witch hunt.

 

We AREN'T talking about Ford.

Ford isn't the topic. The topic is Reade.

And, in what Fantastical World does Hearsay = "corroboration"?

I must've missed that memo.

 

You were sure talking about Two Door Ford back in the day.

The contrast here is stunning and very disappointing.

 

It isn't whether Reade is telling the truth, it's the reaction from the left that is telling. #metoo.

 

It's not disappointing it is expected.

 

Ford was believable why exactly? It certainly wasnt based on the evidence. And if you were having your life blown to pieces over bs political games i bet you would go on a rant too. Any normal person would

 

We are talking the highest job in the American courts, this is not a game. Character counts. I found her believable. This is not a 'criminal trial' where someone's liberty is at stake, and the kind of 'evidence' one would require when we are considering ending a human's liberty must be beyond the pale proof.

But, when applying for a job, no such standard is required. If you were ever turned down for a job, believe me, you weren't required to provide unassailable evidence to prove the assessment made by your potential employer was wrong. They looked you over, they didn't like what they saw. You're not hired, that's it. It's not about "evidence".
It's a job. Remember? Your liberty is not at stake, and this is not a criminal trial.

I looked Kavanaugh over, I heard ford, I found her testimony credible, and I didn't like what I saw in Kavanaugh. His petty rant was way way way below par I would expect of someone on the Supreme Court. I felt the same about Thomas. End of argument.

Any normal person would? For the supreme court, I want someone way above normal. Kavanaugh reminded me of some fool, the kind I might meet who sits at the corner of the bar and rants about right wing meme politics. so, For a position on the Supreme Court, no, I wouldn't. If I did something similar, it would be done with much more verve, humility, and humor that Kavanaugh did. There's a concept called 'class' and I didn't see it in Kavanaugh. He's clearly not made of the right stuff for that court, in my opinion. With all the caviar that's available, the right settles for bologna sandwiches, every time, and I'm not even talking good trimmings.

 

Well at least you admit you didnt care about evidence and just went off who you thought gave a better testimony.

Supreme Court is a job interview. Its also in public view and suppose to be taken seriously. Its not suppose to be a place for political games. Kavanaugh got respect for having the balls to call out the left like he did.

 

His rant was demonstrative of someone unworthy of the Supreme court.

 

It's not a criminal trial, it's about putting someone of the caliber required for justice on the Supreme court. His rant proved he was inferior.

 

Agree to disagree, and i never said it was a criminal trial. That also doesnt absolve the left for trying to destroy a good man in public

 

I am genuinely glad to see Biden get accused just so we can see the hypocrisy of the left on full display.

It’s genuinely showing some of the more “woke” people that dems are not their ally.

They are hurting themselves. And we are just getting started with election season.

 

Hey - with Scalia gone, they needed a new low wattage guy.

It takes a village.