Should it be illegal to portray LGBTQ in a positive light in a movie or tv show?

It could be but it doesn't appear to be.

 

So it is only gay people that are placed in movies and shows due to politics? No other group?

 

No I think a lot of things are included in movies for political purposes.

 

Who gets to determine this?
As long as studios find it beneficial to have a diverse or representative cast they will continue to do so.
And these groups will continue to push for equal representation.

 

Isn't One Million Moms like two people in someone's basement on the interwebs?

 

I do. It is my opinion.

 

Oh ok, my opinion is yours is incorrect.
And the world goes on.

 

So it does.

 

If anyone asks me about bigotry and intolerance, how it manifests on the internet, I'll bookmark your comment on the subject and refer them to it.

You mind? .

 

You must really like cigarettes....

 

Deflection. Not a rebuttal.

 

Man after my own heart..

 

Which have you done more?

1. Smoke cigarettes.
2. Smoked a ghey pole?

Both are nasty to me yet I would not outlaw them..
The Million Moms would do well to mind their own business and stop telling others how to live.

 

Hetero's die in as many instances as gays.
Hetero's life style should be illegal based on such illogic.

 

If one is afraid of dying from the gay lifestyle, one could refrain from living it. Just like if one is afraid of dying from a hetero lifestyle, one could refrain.
But one is going to die whether a gay or hetero lifestyle. There's no stopping that.

 

What's funny is that he says hes pretty hard core left.

Part of me suspects that it's because saying so doesnt mean you are, it just means you wont be blackballed by the perpetually outraged.

 

On what grounds?

 

Lies. AIDS is the only siginficant factor.
Results. Compared with heterosexual men, MSM evidenced greater all-cause mortality. Approximately 13% of MSM died from HIV-related causes compared with 0.1% of men reporting only female partners. However, mortality risk from non–HIV-related causes, including suicide, was not elevated among MSM.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3093261/

Next time use legitimate sources of information.

 

taxpayers pay a lot of money so a minority of homosexual men can get prescription drugs for anal relations.

it costs a lot for research and development and the cost outweighs the benefit, since most American's do not fornicate in the bum

 

homosexuals do not have to refrain, there are prescription drugs that suppress their immune systems so they can fornicate without developing AIDs.

 

While not the majority, the amount of American's who engage in heterosexual anal intercourse, i.e. fornicating in the bum, is quite high and significant.

That's more people than are left handed, which is considered a significant amount. So, the benefit is to the heterosexuals as well as the homosexuals as well.

 

homosexual bum love is much more dangerous than heterosexual.

both homosexual sexual partners have testosterone and do rough sex.

 

You are so out of touch with the reality of both men and women with regards to sex. If you are using testosterone as your reasoning then that mean men do rough sex with women as well, and women never do rough sex. Anal sex is not all that gay and bi men do with each other, not is it always rough sex. Furthermore, women engage in rough sex as the aggressor quite a bit too. Granted, if you have some hard evidence to support your original assertion, by all means provide it.

 

That is an interesting question!

A near death experiencer asked something along that line during their brush with death.

https://www.near-death.com/experiences/gay/christian-andreason.html#a11

 

those few women who take it in the bum are not built like a man, it is anatomically impossible for them to do anal sex like homosexuals

therefore homosexual relations is far dangerous when compared to heterosexual relations, and should be portrayed in a negative light.