A white man, woman vandalized a Black Lives Matter mural on July 4, called racism 'a leftist lie,'..

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Space_Time, Jul 6, 2020.

  1. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    56,983
    Likes Received:
    31,104
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yep, there are definitely racist on both sides. Part of why it is pure bonkers to claim that it doesn't exist.
     
  2. Zorro

    Zorro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    76,851
    Likes Received:
    51,604
    Trophy Points:
    113
    CKW and doombug like this.
  3. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    150,559
    Likes Received:
    63,011
    Trophy Points:
    113
    all the unarmed people police kill would just then be called armed suspects, and the cops could say they feared for their life on anyone they stopped
     
  4. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    150,559
    Likes Received:
    63,011
    Trophy Points:
    113
    they should only be charged with a hate crime if others later painted a "white lives matter" and anyone that vandalized it was charged with the same.

    really, I think it should have been "all lives matter" as that includes both blacks and whites equally

    as it is, I call it vandalized public property, the hate crime charge is to be reserved for real hate crimes imo - there are other crimes to charge them with ... I am fine with those other charges
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2020
  5. doombug

    doombug Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2012
    Messages:
    56,871
    Likes Received:
    22,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Actually there are racists teaching hate in colleges these days. They teach to hate white people. I have yet to see proof of institutionalized racism against blacks. Prolly because it does not exist.
     
  6. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    56,983
    Likes Received:
    31,104
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Just as you haven't shown any evidence of "racists . . . teaching to hate white people" in college. The racism that BLM is typically talking about is implicit racism. It isn't "taught." There's plenty of research showing that people, regardless of race, are quicker to pull the trigger on a black person than on a white person, even in the exact same situation. It isn't a conscious bias most of the time, though that does exist too.
     
  7. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,412
    Likes Received:
    25,367
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, the cops who murdered Floyd would have been arrested or shot on the spot as soon as Floyd begged for his life or sooner.

    But then the cops who arrested Floyd should not have been armed, and Floyd would not have resisted arrest. Rational law enforcement requires very few armed LEOs.
     
  8. liberalminority

    liberalminority Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2010
    Messages:
    25,273
    Likes Received:
    1,633
    Trophy Points:
    113
    this is not england, those men and women who serve and protect have to be armed in the ghettos of chicago.

    Law Enforcement is the military force that keeps civilians safe from radical democrats like black lives matter, antifa, and other looters.
     
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2020
  9. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,412
    Likes Received:
    25,367
    Trophy Points:
    113
    BLM and AntiFa are primarily a threat to unarmed black Americans.
    They pose no significant threat to an armed public
     
  10. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    150,559
    Likes Received:
    63,011
    Trophy Points:
    113
    had anyone tried to stop that cop that day, the other 3 would have shot them

    do we really want to live in a Republican world where citizens shoot cops cause they say they fear for their life?

    if that was allowed, the same problem we have with bad cops, we would have with bad citizens
     
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2020
  11. doombug

    doombug Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2012
    Messages:
    56,871
    Likes Received:
    22,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I thought fearing for one's life was not an acceptable reason to shoot someone....well, lefties claim it isn't.
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  12. doombug

    doombug Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2012
    Messages:
    56,871
    Likes Received:
    22,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Show your evidence first.
     
  13. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    150,559
    Likes Received:
    63,011
    Trophy Points:
    113
    it's not, that is the point, people make up the fear as no way to prove what a person fears in their own mind

    like a black guy running and getting shot in the back... cop claims he feared for his life.... can a citizen do the same?

    a person can seriously "fear" a cop might kill them, I do not think we want to live in a world where that justifies killing a cop... do you?
     
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2020
  14. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,412
    Likes Received:
    25,367
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They were not "cops" they were armed felons caught in the act committing 1st degree murder.

    1. They should not have been armed by government.
    2. The citizens always outnumber the felons.
    3. American citizens should never have been disarmed by government.

    When the people are well armed there will always be law, order and peace on the street. Arming police is optional. An armed citizenry is essential.
     
  15. Stuart Wolfe

    Stuart Wolfe Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2012
    Messages:
    14,967
    Likes Received:
    11,255
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Ddyad likes this.
  16. liberalminority

    liberalminority Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2010
    Messages:
    25,273
    Likes Received:
    1,633
    Trophy Points:
    113
    disarming the police in black ghettos is victimising unarmed American blacks
     
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2020
  17. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,412
    Likes Received:
    25,367
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Most black Americans in our violent ghettos should be carrying firearms to react instantly to violent crime on the streets. Black Americans who choose to go unarmed would be far better protected by an armed public than they are by a few professional police cruising the streets in marked "police cars".
     
    Stuart Wolfe likes this.
  18. liberalminority

    liberalminority Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2010
    Messages:
    25,273
    Likes Received:
    1,633
    Trophy Points:
    113
    that would go against law an order, the democrat states need a welfare plantation in the ghettos

    the second amendment works in the southern states because the whites no longer have plantations.
     
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2020
  19. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,412
    Likes Received:
    25,367
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The old DP plantation system only worked because the 2nd amendment did not permit slaves to be armed.
    The 2nd amendment has never been applied to victims of systemic DP racism - too many DP judges, legislators and police.
    Urban ghettos are part of the DP's neo-Fascist political plantation system.
     
  20. liberalminority

    liberalminority Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2010
    Messages:
    25,273
    Likes Received:
    1,633
    Trophy Points:
    113
    democrats still make laws in the house of representatives, so it would be against law and order.

    that would only be possible if republicans have a veto proof majority in both houses of congress, and hold the Presidency too.
     
  21. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,412
    Likes Received:
    25,367
    Trophy Points:
    113
    IOW, impossible.
     

Share This Page