Are these typical Trump supporters?

The majority of them, do not.

 

Please provide evidence that I suggested people who disagree with me are uneducated.

If you can't, I will file that in my 'untruthful comments' file.

 

"Seem to believe......" is an incompetent rebuttal as if fails to adequately refute the post you are replying to ( because it's vague and unsubstantiated ).

 

Charges listed in articles of impeachment cannot be 'fraudulent'. They can be successfully challenged, but 'fraud' has a specific meaning in law, and it applies to the person charged, not the prosecution or congress. Now, I'm no lawyer, by that is the law as I understand it.

"Power hungry dems' is not a competent argument, vague ( as if repubs are not power hungry ).

 

The daily news vindicates it. Hell the political history of every election for the last 40 years vindicates it so does the the entire 8 years if the Obama administration. A refusal on your part to see the obvious does not make me wrong.

 

Not vague at all. That all politicians tend toward being power hungry does not make the charge being level at some of them inaccurate or vague.
Charges that have no basis in fact and are strictly a specious attempt to cover the fact that you offer nothing that would benefit the American people are indeed fraudulent.

 

Well, if now you are saying all politicians are power hungry, then it's a meaningless statement. But, to state it selectively when all politicians are power hungry, is misleading. So, either way, no debate brownie points for you.

The articles of impeachment for Trump were not specious. The evidence was overwhelming, but ignored by a sycophantic republican senate.

To state otherwise is wishful thinking.

And, removing Trump from office would be beneficial to a majority of Americans.

 

Celebrating the death of your political opposition is always a dangerous political strategy.

 

More vague arguments. My experience is the opposite.

 

From what I can see, the dumpier the house/trailer or car, the bigger and bolder the Trump signs. One dump I saw had 6+ Trump sign plastered all over the yard (together with a slew of 10-30 year old cars in several states of disrepair). I have no idea how the rednecks can love a trust fund baby rich guy from NY city so much.

And than there is this:

Seriously, from the master of you know what....?

 

No it wouldnt. It would be of benefit only to the crooks in DC.

The evidence was pointless silly and underwhelming and was given vastly more attention by the Senate than it should have been.

 

I was basically stating that Trump supporters do not like Mexicans, legal or illegal.

 

Talk about
Vague and pointless. More of a whine than the impossible refutation of an obvious reality. My first political election that I remember was Stevenson vs Eisenhower, in which half the Democratic campaign was spent trying to to convince voters that the architect of D-Day was to stupid to be president. (Talk about your recurrent themes that one has appeared in almost every election sense then and Dems wonder why it gains no traction any more) They accused Goldwater of wanting to start WWIII. And they really went to mats on Nixon. Stupid, fascist, Nazi, racist, never mind that Nixon integrated more public schools than all of his predecessors combined. The same crap was thrown at Reagan and every Republican nominee since then. The only good thing is that it no longer seems to get much traction even in the African American community.

 

Only they will be holding hands while jumping off of tall buildings.

 

Do you have anything to back up that questionable claim?

 

First post I responded to.

I did but I know you will pretend otherwise.

 

Meh the majority of working class jobs aren't done by them.

 

Totally incorrect, they are a majority in this county and based on the last rally held by the Republicans a majority of Mexicans around here support Trump.

 

Funny how you don't apply this to your partisan viewpoint that Trump committed obstruction of justice via-a-vis the Mueller Report.

 

Impeaching a President for an abuse of power absent direct evidence of the President actually exercising a power could not be more specious
Impeaching a President for the legal exercise of executive privilege could not be more specious.

To believe otherwise is willful ignorance and an obstinate and intolerant devotion to hyper partisan prejudice.

 

More vague arguments. My experience is the opposite.

 

If I must have misunderstood. My apologies!

 

You sure did. Conservatives dislike illegal immigration, not the people who do it. They don't even know the people involved.

 

I do not like the term illegal "immigrants". Illegals are not immigrants they are just ilegals as in bulgurers who commit the criminal act of illegal entry. Immigrants are people who come here legally go through the immigration process and hold a legally obtained green card. Simple ilegals are called ilegals because they committed an illegal act.
They are criminals !

I may give the DACA kids a break but not their parents who were adults when they made the illegal entry.

 

We agree there.