Do you agree with race realism?

What are "white colored people?"

 

Then why do blacks commit so many crimes against other blacks?

 

If previous persecution lowers the average IQ of a race, why did the Holocaust not lower the IQ averages of Jews? They still have averages of 110 to 115.

 

Hard as you find this to believe people are individuals and do things for individual reasons. I realize some people probably base their behavior on what the Grand Kleagle tells them the Master Race should be doing that day and I guess if that floats their boat they should load the freight, but most regular sorts don't play that game.

 

Blacks are characterized everywhere in the world by high crime rates. I do not think that is coincidental. I think it is the reflection of instincts that had survival value in the tribal societies of sub Saharan Africa.

 

No time. The Holocaust only lasted 4 years

IQs are caused by a combination of perceptual and cognitive abilities and the richness of one's cultural milieu. The Jewish religion values education and culture above all else and they thusly provide themselves and their children with the most advanced learning experiences of any people on Earth, that's why they have high IQs. Had the Germans enslaved them for several generations they would appear to have the lowest IQ's of anyone.

 

Instincts do not really exist in humans, not like they do in any other animal at least. We determine our behavior mainly with thought, that is why we rule the world.

 

I doubt that. Jews in Christian Europe were discriminated against and persecuted for about one thousand years. They were not allowed to own land or to practice most trades. When this came to an end in the early nineteenth century it became immediately obvious that Jews were exceptionally intelligent.

American Negroes have IQ averages of 85. African Negroes have averages of 70. For that reason alone I doubt that slavery and Jim Crow legislation are responsible for the fact that blacks still tend to be less intelligent than whites. We have IQ averages of 100.

 

Humans have instincts that often conflict with current needs for survival. During the Cold War the United States and the Soviet Union prepared to fight a nuclear war that would have ended civilization.

Typical black behavior can be explained by instincts that made sense in the African jungle. Because women could farm without the help of men, they were willing to have sex with men who had no intention of marrying them. Black men tried to have sex with as many women as possible. On the one hand, children could be raised with less assistance than in cold climates. On the other hand, there was no defense against African diseases, which could kill anyone regardless of how they lived. It made sense to have as many children as possible, with little concern for taking care of them.

These are patterns that Negroes continue to demonstrate in white majority countries. Indeed, welfare programs have exacerbated this kind of black behavior.

 

By white values I mean obeying the law and getting married before having children. Most whites accept Orientals. Those who do not like Orientals resent them because they cannot compete with them academically and economically. Concerning white values, Orientals are whiter than whites.

 

I'm wondering if you read the entire article.

The gap in denial rates isn’t the only problem facing minority homebuyers. Black and Hispanic borrowers also have significantly lower buying power than white buyers. In fact, according to Zillow Chief Economist Aaron Terrazas, black buyers had the least purchasing power of all races last year, able to afford just 55% of all homes for sale, while white buyers could afford nearly 80%.

That steep discrepancy in buying power is widening the divide in homeownership among the races. In fact, it’s now worse than a full century ago. In 1900, the disparity between black and white homeownership was 27.6%. Now, it’s 30.3%.

“Because of income disparities, black borrowers have fewer housing choices, especially in expensive markets,” Ryan said. “This will drive up debt ratios that could disqualify them. Also, black and Latinos generally have worse credit — measured in the classic way — than whites. Twenty-five percent of blacks, versus 65% of whites, have prime credit scores.”

This of course isn't really the topic of thread, simply a distraction you've thrown in for some reason, but the point, as your article makes clear, is that there are very good economic reasons for the disparity, not redlining or whatever racist conspiracy you are imagining.

 

Affirmative Action has very little to do with race???

 

So I guess that Blacks don't value education and culture. Fair enough. But they shouldn't expect good jobs and respect from White people who do value such.

 

I generally agree with race realists but geneticists no longer use the term 'race', which has been replaced with haplogroups that pertain to a single line of descent. In human genetics, Y-chromosome (Y-DNA) haplogroups and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) haplogroups can be used to define genetic populations. By tracing these haplogroups, you can go back in time to study ancient civilizations.

 

No.

 

You should have learned the definition of subset in high school, if not earlier. A subset is part of a set unified by characteristics not found in the larger set.

 

Race realism has legitimate policy implications. The fact that blacks tend to be significantly less intelligent than whites means that affirmative action is unjust. The fact that blacks have a murder rate eight times the white rate means that racial profiling is justified.

 

George Will does not use the term reverse discrimination but rather compensatory discrimination. This does not deny that it is still discrimination. (In this case against Whites) The question on the table now is if discrimination is ever acceptable as a de jure instrument of government.

 

Today's conservatives will be tomorrows liberals.
The world is always moving towards more equality.

Some day, All Men Are Created Equal, will actually be a true statement.

 

I oppose affirmative action because private companies should be able to choose the best employee.

I oppose profiling as policy because it isn't 'law enforcement', its 'pre-crime'. Whether one person is more likely a criminal than another person is immaterial because they're both supposed to be presumed law-abiding until theres theres evidense of a crime. That being said, I also believe profiling at the individual level is unavoidable. The individual LEO on the street is going to make decisions that qualify as profiling regardless of whether they're sposed to or not, and it makes sense to do so right up until it conflicts with agency policy and/or the letter of the law.

 

Affirmative action has been a failure where ever it has been implemented. Those that benefit are those who do not need assistance plus affirmative action is the best example of racism there is.

 

When you figure out you are just one of the 7.5 billion passengers on a 5 billion year old spaceship it all comes together..

Here come old blacktop... Over me.


Basically your OP is a loaded racist viewpoint

All Humans are created equal. You are trying to prove otherwise.

 

Where are people to live? In their cars? Won't Ivanka get them something new? Maybe a sleeping bag?

 

If benefits don't get extended this week

Expect Mayhem to get closer to your home

They go on vacation next week