Illinois teen arrested in fatal shooting at Kenosha protest, police say

Incorrect, thats a very good way to decide how much of an issue something is. Murder violates peoples rights to. As for most of the rest, I can agree.

I think black people are more inclined to fight police because of the objectively false narratives constantly reinforced that paint their greatest enemy as police, particularly white police. I think the issue of being a statistical anomaly of single parent homes overwhemingly contributes to it as well as they are also a statistical anomaly of violence as well. More violence, more police interaction, less respect for police, equals bad news.

 

It may have been unwise to put himself in that position. I know I certainly would not have if the option of planting my fat, happy ass in my cushy suburban living room was a viable option. BUT, if these violent "protests" keep happening, and we continue seeing police precincts and random auto-parts stores (and others) burned to the ground, with outright assault with deadly weapons directed towards law enforcement and anyone judged to be on the "wrong" side, we're going to see more and more and more of this, until the next thing you know we're going to have a full blown deadly Civil War happening. Only it won't be as clear cut as North vs. South, and nobody but Antifa will be wearing uniforms, so knowing who is on which side will be very difficult to accurately ascertain.

As for me personally, I'm too old and WAAAYYY too disabled to participate in such nonsense, so I'll just sit on the sidelines and watch if it's possible. If they bring the fight to me, I'll do everything in my ability to make sure I get them before they get me, but let's hope it doesn't come to that.

 

The only reasonable conclusion is that I am refusing to do your research for you, or anyone else. I dont care what other people “feel” is my responsibility in discussion, I will never do anyone’s research for them. It is on everyone to be informed, not my job to inform them.

He was absolutely allowed to carry that weapon in that war zone, so that he could defend himself from the irrational terrorists.

And he did so effectively.

 

Its a human condition, its the fact that young men that grow up without a father or a father figure are significantly more likely to be violent criminals. It does not matter what the race is.. no father = much higher % of criminal behavior.

Unfortunately in the Black community the % of fatherless households is almost 70% and much higher in bad neighborhoods..

So combine that with a poor neighborhood and you get violent criminal humans. And violent criminal humans are going to interact with police in a violent manner with predictable results..

Fun fact the race with the lowest % of fatherless households are Asians.. Race with the highest economic success? Asians..

 

maybe, or it could be because he was charged so fast it is to protect him and his family from potential retaliation, and the charges will be dropped after everything calms down.

Usually there is a investigation before anyone is charged, so if they come out and say it was self defense and no charges, i could see Antifa trying to burn down his house. So quickly charging him might allow time for things to cool down

 

Didn't they release him at the scene at first? That dosent really happen unless you had extremely compelling evidence in your favour.

 

If thats how you choose to “feel” about it, thats entirely ok.

 

Is that like just before Rome fell that they made Murder a Misdemeaner. Maybe that was Greece or the Han dynasty? Just asking!

 

A "well regulated militia" wouldn't strand a 17 year old by himself in front of a burned down building to protect the building from fellow citizens.

I think the founding fathers didn't write that into the Constitution as throw away phrase.

 

Of course he would be called a thug, a BLMer, an ANTIFALA member, a Welfare Cheat, a Trayvon, a drug seller and that would be topped off by calling him a Democrat.

 

But look at the reality it was thrown away.

 

Not even close to true if all other circumstances were the same.

 

I understood that he was just ignored not detained at first.

 

He went hunting for humans and forgot to get a stamp.

 

You really want me to believe that a armed Black young man being in the vicinity of demonstrators would be treated ok. Look Inwas born at night but not last night.

 

The objective data demonstrates the objective fact that he is allowed to carry a gun in order to protect himself in this war zone that was that city. He is allowed to do that and did so remarkably well. He defended himself from the irrational terrorists who attacked him.

 

Why bother just have Trump issue a pardon before trial and save the cost of a trial. You would need to declare his crimes to be federal.

 

If he was attacked and he protected himself in the same manner, yes...he would have the support of the right.

You can “feel” otherwise, but it is true.

 

It will be an interesting prosecutorial decision if the kid isn't charged with the killing (and they find "self-defense").

I just don't see that happening.

I feel that the Murder Charge is going to stick.

Maybe he gets offered a plea to a lesser degree?

 

It doesn’t matter how many times I say it, or dont say it, it still remains the objective fact. He is absolutely allowed to carry in that war zone in order to protect himself. This remains true regardless of the irrational claims otherwise. He defended himself quiet well as well from the violent BLM and antifa terrorists.

If you wish to disagree, you may. YOu can “feel” however you want, but i will never do your research for you to prove the objective fact I am correct.

 

The kid looks like he is 15 and any check would have prevented the tragedy. Regardless the police openly supporting the vigilante groups makes them liable as the actions of the vigilantes are illegal and the cops know it.