Kamal Harris Approves Of The Riots

CNN is looking for "journalists".

 

Soros will pull his money from the DNC if they get too uppity in condemning violence.

 

Without it, none of this would have ever happened....

 

Don't need to read into their actions. You can say anything. But actions tell the truth.

 

I find it hysterical that some posters that have put up literally thousands of negative, anti-Trump threads all of a sudden are getting the vapors over others calling a street whore, a street whore.

 

"Street whore" huh?

On a thread based on a lie?

You people are "interesting" to be kind

 

Wait...what? You think peaceful protesting is the same as rioting? Sorry but that’s f’kd.
The two are very different. It’s sad you don’t see the distinction.

 

She doesn't have to, America understands what she meant.

 

Only the mindreaders among us. The rest of America deals with reality.

 

I call them as I see them. If I see a bunch of people engaged in arson and burglary and murder I call that a riot. If I see a bunch of people carrying signs screeching and chanting mindless psychobabble, I see a bunch of rioters warming up in the bullpen waiting for the sun to go down. When I see a group of like minded people airing their grievances in polite, engaging language who are open to civil debate and act responsibly, I call that a peaceful protest.

 

That's probably true; she perceives the right to derail justice as her personal purview. Funny in that she isn't speaking of the violent rioters burning cities, or the crime waves killing small children, the lunatics set free to attack people at random for what they assume you think- She's speaking of the people thinking we will have to become vigilantes to do the job of protecting our own lives and property, which the democrats in these cities prevent police from doing. She will tolerate no interference with the protection she and the democrats freely give to the criminals. That is an invitation to vigilantism, there should be no surprise it is growing.

Vigilantes are the kind of law enforcement that is formed by citizens when there is no law, or law enforcement fails to act. It's not only proper in it's place, it's absolute necessity for survival- and people like Harris have been setting the stage for it for a long time. They should expect that eventually, citizens will arise to do the job that they refuse to do. Right now- iot may be a few acting alone, but it will become organized and targeted if the failure to enforce laws and support police continue. Even avid anti-gun people are now desperately trying to buy guns, because the democrats have made it clear that police in their control aren't coming to protect citizens or property. Around 40% of gun background checks are coming from first-time buyers. The gun market is heavily back ordered, ammunition is hard to buy and both guns and ammo are over-priced if you can find them. But the politicians are keeping private security at taxpayer expense for themselves, so concern for public safety is of little interest to them. That will not prevent vigilante justice- only the restoration of legitimate legal justice can do that, and so far, the democrats refuse to even recognize the crimes in front of them are crimes, or the perps are criminals. It's like gas-lighting the public, claiming the elephant in the room really isn't there at all- and you must be delusional if you see it. This assumption of public stupidity is brazen as well as absurd, and it's not working.

One shouldn't expect people who dismiss their duty so easily to suddenly or ever become responsible again, so the trust of the public has been lost, and the arming of citizens will continue at a record pace- and when they push it to last straw, the proverbial feces will hit the fan..... and I doubt it will overlook the enablers of the crime and riots surging in dem cities across the nation.

Kind of missed that side of it, didn't you? Or just don't give a rat's ass?

 

Yeah, she is referring to the vigilantes and extremists, as the people trying to protect the stores and properties from the lawless social justice warriors of BLM and antifa thugs. She sure as hell is not referring to BLM or antifa as vigilantes and extremists.

 

The past few months have clearly shown that the Democrat's allies in BLM and antifa are using the ruse of protests to loot, burn and destroy, to tear the system down, to burn it all down.

"If this country doesn't give us what we want, then we will burn down this system and replace it," said Hawk Newsome, chairman of Black Lives Matter of Greater New York, during an interview with Fox News.

"This country is built upon violence," Newsome said, pointing to the American Revolution and modern American diplomacy as examples. "We go in and we blow up countries and we replace their leaders with leaders who we like. So for any American to accuse us of being violent, it's extremely hypocritical."

 

Compare the later to the always lawful, polite and peaceful TEA Party protests.

Then contrast the TEA Party to any of the Democratic Party sponsored BLM protests in Ferguson, Baltimore, Seattle, San Jose, Portland, Kenosha, or others like occupy wall street, and the pre / post Trump election protests, and all we see are violence, physical assault, shootings, murder, arson, looting, and the Dems never speak out against it, they only encourage BLM and antifa.

 

Peaceful protesters and rioters are different. Anyone who can’t tell the difference needs neurological cognitive testing.

 

You mean YOU are making claims unsupported by reality

ohh...

 

Vigilantes... like the 17 year old that went to Kenosha intending to shoot people and killed two

 

You don't know Rittenhouse's intent.

 

Really. So a 17 year old kid gives an interview saying he’s going to protect businesses and his only means of doing so was the AR-15 he’s had strapped military style around his neck.

What could his intent have been? He certainly didn’t have the physical presence to do anything.

All he had was his assault rifle

 

Yes, yes, I'm beginning to see the light.

This is peaceful protest:

I'm concerned about the kid's mental stability. I know nothing of his background, but when I was 17 my interests were my girlfriend, beer and weed. Is this a phenomenon or an isolated incident? How many other teen age boys are geared up and ready to go?

This kid had no business being in Kenosha. The right's admiration is a dangerous road to travel.

 

Oh I forgot, you cleverly excuse the riots by labeling them as "peaceful protests". The odd part is you assume the rest of the country is stupid enough to keep believing that.

 

~ Democrats says there's no such thing as "fake news" .

 

You mean like what Dirty Donnie gave to the white supremacists in Charlottesville ?

Thank you for explaining that.

 

If threads can't post untruths, how can a supporter of tRUMP start a thread?
The interview was clearly about protests.