A statistically unlikely event that occurred at a suspicious time. I'm involved in data collection and graphing at a professional level (though more on the technical field aspect of it), and when we see a graph do that, its common knowledge that 'something happenned that wasn't supposed to' and its usually me that has to go figure out what. Maybe nothing happened. But its worth investigating, right? If there's nothing, what's the worry?
On what basis is it "statistically unlikely"? Have you looked to see what counties were being counted at this time/if more mail-in ballots were being counted at this time, etc? Have you compared it to states like Florida and Texas?
So the simple solution is that the commission counting the votes is releasing results in blocks and that this was the first block of mail in votes released? But you can make it whatever you want if that's what floats your boat.
Every 4 or 6 years up until this year we had that same mysterious statistical anomaly in Colorado, I got to bed with the Republican governor candidate winning by 50,000 votes, a miracle occurs at 3 am and tens of thousands of votes appear 98% for democrats and the lead is wiped out by morning. Funny thing that. I guess Wisconsin and Michigan learned some lessons from Boulder Colorado, how to come up with just the right number of votes at 3 am in the morning.
"Blabbering" is right. https://www.politifact.com/factchec...consin-doesnt-have-more-ballots-cast-registe/ There is no evidence of voter fraud in the video from what I've seen so far, and the best "evidence" she's provided is completely incorrect.
OK, fair enough. But 3.3m out of 3.6m voters doing their business, it's pretty suspicious, I must say. That's one high % voting.
Neither unlikely nor suspicious, but expected. Many states don't start counting mail-in ballots until polls close, and since more Democrats voted by mail . . . Logic.
