Data deep dive on Dominion Voting Systems offers incontrovertible proof of election hack

The "report" is from NOQ, not OAN. I have read it. And I've read the fact checks. It's lies.

 

OANN is rated as low accuracy by every organization that tracks media bias — if you have evidence besides regurgitation of a conspiracy theory feel free to post it. I am not surprised you are utilizing an extreme rightwing “source” to gather your facts.

 

Yep, and that's exactly how the court case is going to go.

Judge: "So do you actually have any evidence of your claims?"
Trump lawyer: "No, your honor. But doombug has seen, like, soooo many Tweets about this stuff."
Judge: "*Gasp* well that's outright treason right there, then."

 

The link is to MICHIGAN.Gov, not Snopes.

The summary is a summary of the facts, as explained at MICHIGAN.gov

I know, I know... you don't trust them either. (There, saved you from responding)

 

I just read a report on Dominion Software. The review on the Dominion Software was that it was not secure and easily hackable. It was rejected by Texas in January 2019 because of huge flaws, but other states went ahead anyways? WTF?

Note: My company is all about data, reports, metrics, etc. Our main software is a visualization software. We have a Software that automates the process and other software that do Earned Value, What If Analysis, and Data Automation.

 

Really funny how these "errors" always benefit the left, I'm sure it's just a big "coincidence"...

 

By who and by what means?

 

I want to see how these 'incontrovertible' claims stack up in court. That should be funny.

 

@ECA you asked for proof, here you go!

 

What? There was no benefit.

 

You’re a little behind. The claim of widespread fraud has already been debunked

 

Biden took Florida, UNTIL the hacked voting machines stole the vote for Trump.

Prove me wrong.

 

The moon is blue cheese, prove me wrong. Somewhere, Brenda Snipes laughs.

 

Republicans lost Texas, until they hacked the voting machines in Texas.


Prove me wrong.

 

Republicans lost Ohio, until they paid off vote counters to cheat

Prove me wrong.

 

JSON files are used to transfer data via network or the internet via API. The data is then processed and shown in a table or is used in charts. The identifiers 187 and 188 could be anything.
It’s not wise to jump to conclusions without knowing what exactly this data was supposed to be used for.

Added: I would also like to point out that it’s unlikely that a percent ratio for each candidate would be transmitted via a file as it wastes a ton of space on something that can be calculated by the machine preparing the data for final display. Also, where are the other presidential candidates? If the system transmitted percentages and absolute values then the values were filtered for just 2 specific candidates, which means it was just a response to a request for pre-filtered data, making this whole JSON file as relevant, as someone’s personal spreadsheet.

 

Snopes -- a factchecking site started by two liberals in their basement.

So other than paid staff using a search engine and a liberal bias what exactly makes Snopes an arbiter of the truth? Because they claim to be? They somehow can pick and choose what they find on the Internet and determine what is true as compared to anyone else? Does snopes have first hand knowledge of anything?

The facts are that voting machines are subject to hacking and fraud. The hacking of these machines is regularly demonstrated at the DEFCON conferences in Los Vegas.

For anyone that knows US history, all US Presidential elections have some degree of fraud.

 

But yet when snopes reads about something on the Internet, they can pronounce truth or fiction.

 

Some guy and his ex, yet it's liberal gospel and clearly left biased.
By mid-2014, Barbara had not written for Snopes "in several years"[1] and David was forced to hire users from Snopes.com's message board to assist him in running the site. The Mikkelsons divorced around that time.[1][14] Christopher Richmond and Drew Schoentrup became part owners in July of 2016 with the purchase of Barbara Mikkelson's share by the internet media management company Proper Media.[15]

 

Yup.

Really simple stuff.

...

 

SPECIAL THANKS to The New York Times for Accidentally Providing the Data that Will Bring Down Biden and CRACK THE BIGGEST VOTE FRAUD IN HISTORY
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...ce=Twitter&utm_campaign=websitesharingbuttons

This guy: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2wesk/happening-calling-every-pede-to-/

He claims to have downloaded the data and written a script that has produced evidence of hundreds of thousands votes switched.

 

He "claims"?

I heard that some guy on the internet CLAIMED that Bat Boy lost Millions of vote due to "vote switching".

Of course, I don't know if it is true.
It sounds kind of sketchy to me.

BUT, I heard it from some guy on the internet, so I figured PF had the right to know.

Lotsa vote-switching happening. Major stuff.

 

Do you code?

 

I do.
I read the article and looked at the proof and my conclusion is that it’s bogus. JSON files are text files that use loose set of rules used to transfer complex datasets. You can connect your excel to any publicly available API that was tracking elections and write macros to refresh data based on pre-defined input parameters. So, the file looks like a response that Excel would receive via the API, that would provide raw data for Excel to read with instructions on how to assemble a table for visual representation.
In Layman’s Terms, the data file on which this whole claim is constructed looks painfully like something that any advanced excel user can produce in less than a half an hour.