Pro-Biden Bug Also Suspected in Georgia's Vote-Counting Software

Apparently flynns lawyer thinks it was some Cabal of Cuba Venezuela and China lol

 

Yes, they are nothing more then conspiracies. I'm glad you've come to your senses.

 

yup he is the top Hunter Gatherer!!!

And the computer repair guy not only knew what those emails were he knew to get those emails to Giulianski's attorney!! Not to GIULIANI but to Rudy's lawyer!! Wow the lawyer of the lawyer. Sure every computer repairman know that Rudy has his own lawyer and that you bring emails to to Rudy's lawyer.

Amazing what Trump fans will believe.

 

Yep, from now on I"m 100% trusting the MSM.

 

I didn't "tout" anything. I merely pointed out that you were touting a standard that was replaced back in 2005. You remember the wild days of 2005, don't you? Back when the Orange book was "the thing?" Back when clicking any link put your computer's life in danger? When new computers were delivered with malware embedded? That's why the CC was created. Because what we were doing before wasn't working.

I can't speak to whether there is a profile for voting machines in the Criteria but I do know this. DHS has worked with every manufacturer and each state right down to the local supervisors testing and validating voting machines. I know that the machines in use in every district in every state were certified for operation by DHS and I know that the entire operation was managed by an exceptionally competent Director appointed by Donald Trump.

There has been no real evidence of software failures or access control failures and few reports of hardware failures.

Until there is such evidence, as relates to this election, there is nothing to discuss.

 

what a joke!!

Are trying to tell us that you hacked into Dominion;s source code? How did you get a Dominion guy to give you the password to by-pass security?

oK let's make believe that you did!! Do you realize that if such a subroutine existed the end result would be a 100% vote for Biden and the subroutine would attempt to create a negative vote for Trump. Since there is no such thing as a negative vote being tabulated from an optical scanner the total vote subroutine would crash and the technical term for such a crash would be a Vomit.

ok now let's make believe that I am wrong ( which is nearly impossible I know). Each voting location has at least two people print off the tab results so if Biden's vote counts were all 100 % and Trump's was 0 don't you think somewhere along the line the Republican guy would have spotted that?

Let us make believe that this was done. OK so to do it and not to get anyone to be suspicious you need to change votes randomly . So your make believe count votes routine you should have invoked a random number generator and changed votes randomly? Or you should have written a subroutine that counted how many votes you changed and then went to a random number table and invoked another routine to randomly select which vote would be changed?

This is fun exposing the BS of the Trump clan.

 

Damn, you brought some memories of the wild days of the past!

 

Bool biden_certified = false;
While(biden_certified == false)
{
Draw_middle_finger();
}

 

Firstly I stated the Orange Book was dated and you assert that I think it is current. But I like the Orange Book and mentioned it because it describes assurance levels that can be quickly read and understood. Just because something is superseded does not mean it is improved. Back in the day most people who worked in IT understood what C2 assurance was. As opposed to (for example) PP_APP_v1.3. Without looking it up, who knows WTF that means.

Are you claiming that DHS certified voting machines in every State? Or did DHS simply provide some testing assistance noting vulnerabilities such as described in the DHS OIG audit linked below.

https://www.oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/assets/2020-10/OIG-21-01-Oct20.pdf

which states:

In laboratory testing environments, security researchers have repeatedly demonstrated that some voting machines are vulnerable to compromise, usually due to physical access to the machines, which could result in the manipulation of vote totals.

 

Pretty absurd and telling to me that he thought 2005 was ancient history. Back in the day people learned to program in assembly language. Do they even teach assembly language in school anymore? Without low level coding experience, how does someone have the skillset to determine software is trustworthy? To put it another way, software is no more trustworthy now than it was in 2005 and if anything less trustworthy.

 

Yeah, the guy that's creating the atmosphere of doubt is Trump.
Irregularities happen on all elections, but no president in history made a stink out of them, Just Trump

None of them add up to 'dems stealing the election'. Just about every lawsuit has been thrown out.

 

He lost the popular vote by 3 million, so it's understandable.
But Clinton conceded, gracefully, and Obama assisted in the transition.

Biden won the popular vote by 5 million, now has 306 electors.

Give it up.

 

All electronic voting should have paper back up.

If one votes electronically, it should print a
vote confirmation paper. The voter confirms
by signature and puts it in a paper ballot box
next to the computer station. Only if an electronic
vote is contested would the paper ballots be counted.
easy - peasy


Moi
oopsy, maybe a voter writes the voter confirmation number on
the paper paper ballot that corresponds to computer generated
confirmation number for each ballot cast. Then a paper ballot
can be matched, ballot by ballot, with the computer.
The voter writing the number on the paper is their confirmation
of accuracy. No names

Stop Election Interference​

 

And me makes three.
No problem with doing a legal recount.
No problem in bringing things to court (though the frivolous law suits annoy me, and the ones that are designed to annul votes that were legal when made sadden me)
But the way in which this is being done is just awful. We always knew that Trump could never act presidential, we always knew that he couldn't even act like a moral human being, but I thought that he could at least act like a patriot.
This all caps screaming, lying rampage he is goign on only serves to undermine the next president and cast a shadow on our democracy. The damage this does to our institutions and our democracy is unbeleivable.

 

Haven't you figured it out yet? Pretty much everything you believe is total bs; total and complete nonsense generated by liars and lunatics.

 

Let's start from the basics. Do you really believe that the Dems and the Reps would not have assigned representatives (assisted registrars) overlooking the operation of each count in every county in the country? Next do you really believe that the algorithm has really been written to switch votes, an algorithm that is readily accessible to analyze? Next, do you really believe that anyone behind this cunning plan did not think that a recount would occur exposing the fraud making the whole cunning plan pointless?

 

Because his credibility has already been nuked...

 

The rally thing was always a fake metric. Started by Trump of course, because rally size is important to him. It didn't matter. People didn't need a rally to vote against Trump. Certainly the Republicans who crossed party to vote for Biden against Trump didn't, even though they voted Republican down ballot. There were more Republicans than you think who were sick of Trump's **** but didn't want to give Democrats control of Congress. A vote for Biden felt safe enough because they could at least rely on him to not have Trump's crass and boorish nature while knowing they were helping the Republicans keep Congress, their real party before Trump took over.

 

Also means that Congress can vote on what they really believe is best for the US and not just follow Trump's orders

 

Fake news.

 

Trump attempted to create a self fulfilling prophecy by saying up front for almost a year before the election that if he does not win it will be because of fraud. Sadly most of his fans, semi intelligent or dishonest people support his lies.

 

Let me take a stab at those on behalf of PF.com conservatives.

1. Our people didn't have equal access to the operation
2. Our people didn't have equal access to analyze the algorithms
3. Our people won't have equal access to control the recounts (except in Georgia of course)

 

Most of my personal internal polling involvement was focused on Florida but I have talked with folks about the situation in Georgia.

By the way, Florida wasn't affected by this software crap and everything I posted on this forum about Trump's lead in Florida panned out.

I can easily say that the emphasis is NOT on the actual ballot count.

Lin Wood
@LLinWood
·
13h
Biden & his criminal cronies are not going to sleep well tonight. Well, Biden might because he probably forgot the name Scytl. His co-conspirators know name well. They also know the name Paragon, company which purchased Scytl in 10/20. Every will be revealed. #FightBack
Quote Tweet

oriJONal
@orijonal
· 23h

SCYTL RAID

@replouiegohmert reveals US Army (CIA?) team raid on Scytl server facility in Frankfurt, Germany to recover "extremely compelling" data detailing vote switching.

 

LOL Why would you need an army to raid a office building patrolled by Herman the night security guard on minimum wage in another country!

Instead of that crap, try answering the questions of mine that you quoted

edit any searches to your fake news leads to many websites containing malicious viruses attempting to infect anyone's computer. Says it all about your "facts"

 

Biden’s a hollow man, an empty shell with a D behind his name. He did nothing and will do nothing on his own. It’s whoever is pulling his strings we need to be concerned about.