Two tiered system? Many Pa. counties didn't allow voters to cure rejected mail-in ballots

I have been quite specific and consistant so either address what I posted or don't bother. And I have not said hold up a national election and will not debate things I haven't said. I have said let the legal actions take their course, Trump has a right to file contest. I don't think they are going to matter. That does NOT mean this was a clean election and not froth with irregularities and mishandling of ballots and we need a FULL investigation into that and I would suggest a Joint Congressional Committee. Good grief Congress spend enough time chasing the bogus Russia collusion and Hillary lost because of Russia based on phony evidence. We have evidence of irregularities and sworn testimony to them. OK let's check it out and make sure every legal vote was counted and every illegal vote that did not meet the rules as set by the state legislature was discarded. Take lessons learned and improve on the next especially if we are going to stick with this mass mailin voting. What do you have against that?

 

The left sure loves whistleblowers except when the have something to do with the Biden's.

 

.pleas disregard the above post I didn't have time to correct it.
.It doesn't matter if you say it or not a drawn out investigation could easily hold up the election. Once again you really don't define what you mean by investigation or the consequences it could have on holding up the election. You are incapable of discussing a defining point when this comes to an end so you as of now this investigation is indefinite and without end.

A joint committee to do what? and certainly you're not suggesting that any of the elected republicans officials who went along with Trump when he called democrats guilty of stealing the election before it happened be on any such committee. Over and over you have no problems with Trump calling democrats guilty of stealing the election before the election happened. So any elected republicans who didn't cry out against the president for claiming the democrats were guilty before innocent and guilty before an election took place, couldn't be trusted to be on any such committee. Once again you are deliberately vague on specifics.


You fail to agree that the most important voice in the free world sated that the democrats were guilty of stealing the election before it started. You have no problem with the democrats being declared guilty without proof.

The Russia investigation has nothing to do with this at all except maybe you're looking for revenge other wise why mention it?

You have nothing against declaring the democrats guilty of stealing an election before it happened a charge placed by the most important man in the free world. That is the biggest lesson so far. And we will not allow a single state election to be stopped after certification. Trump failed in the courts so he doesn't get to investigate certified state elections. The other lesson is that we can't have the president of the U.S. telling people that there mail in ballots are in jeopardy before the election. No one should risk getting sick in order to vote. That is absolutely barbaric. I would say your post is poorly thought out and verges on the looney.
You live in a fantasy world. 30 of Trumps cases have been tossed simply because Trump claimed that democrats were guilty of stealing the election. Thus guilty before innocent was the order of the day for you and republican poll watchers.

 

Been done before for an election and I believe in PA.

 

The investigation for which I call and we desperately need will have nothing to do with the inaguration and holding up anything.

When you can get that straight get back to me.

Why do you keep injecting Trump here, I'm not talking about anything Trump is doing. A full investigation ended up before that committee to review all the election processes and irregulatries that were found and how they happened and how they can be prevented. As I said state with the joint Cater/Baker commission report and build of that.

Well since the Russian investigation had nothing to do with anything but revenge.....................

 

Lol once again vague as hell and useless you haven't a clue as to what you mean by investigation other than disrupt a fair and free election.

Thus from the beginning you miss the point. This has everything to do with Psycho-Don whether you like it or not. Trump (the most important voice in the free world) told his poll watchers that the Democrats had somehow cheated and stolen the election before it took place and without a shred of evidence. The republican poll watchers were already tainted and looking for evidence that was never there per the leader of their party.

So you're actually confessing that you want to block a fair and free presidential election for the sole purpose of your personal revenge. We can both agree that you would rather see our country torn asunder with you scorched earth policy than have Biden win.

 

How am I proposing a disruption and why do you oppose investigating all the things we know did go wrong like unsecured ballots being found, ballots not being properly certified, witness affidavits and ballots being mishandled, rules and dates being changed midstream by unauthorized agents and on and on.

You have missed the point my post has nothing to do with Trump who has every right to contest an election just as candidates do routinely.

Not even close and was posting an irony.

 

EXCEPT:

1) IF there was really any "there", there...
...We would already know about it...

2) There is No "there", there.

3) Refer to 1) and 2)

 

Yep. They all had the same opportunity.

 

Why would we already know it when the election had just been certified and no one has actually done a study of the results? It could takes months.

 

BUT, it CAN'T "take months".

So, obviously, you're "talking point" has been thoroughly debunked.

The Electors MUST Vote on Dec. 14th.

How is it going to take months?

Trump LOST. Period. End of Story.

You do understand the significance of Dec. 14th? Correct?

 

His claims are built on a house of cards.

 

Your claim is based on only one thing. Trump the most significant voice in the free world merely because he's the president of the U.S. told his poll watchers that democrats had cheated and stolen the election in September before it occurred. That's why his ridiculous claims of fraud are tossed out of all the state courts. You haven't got a clue of what you're doing but you are supporting the fraud claims that Trump made in September 100%. and you buy his claims that the democrats cheated in September.

 

Huh?

In another thread, and you've still got NOTHING?

You have discovered Incontrovertible "Evidence" that will stand up (and be validated) in a serious Court of Law?

Please post it. I haven't seen any.

It CAN'T just be:

"something, some guy on the internet, Nessie, gotta be true, read it somewhere".

It has to be REAL (substantive) "Evidence".

 

This began in September when Trump told republican poll watchers democrats would steal the election.

 

CALLING A POSTER DUMB VIOLATES BOARD RULES.

 

Didn’t say he was dumb, just that he wanted to stay dumb about the evidence. English.

 

This is such a great country. The dominion machines have been under fire since they were first purchased and by democrats at that! The witnesses provide insight on how screwed up these elections are using these machines. We deserve better.

 

Regardless what the poll watcher witnesses say, regardless of the claims about dominion, the actual sample of hard evidence of illegal votes in just Maricopa county call into question how the vote could be certified.

 

Why can't an investigation into what actually happened in the election with all the irregularities we know happened and unconstitutional acts by judges and election officials take whatever time it takes? What's the rush? The electors are going to vote and Biden is going to win, we can agree to that stipulation for the future. That's not what this is about.

 

What’s the problem of looking into any of this? If there is no fraud then what is the problem?

The pushback to block any audit is because, deep down, everyone knows there is a problem.

 

DUMB IS DUMB AND TELLING A POSTER HE IS STAYING DUMB MEANS HE'S DUMB AND TECHNACALLY YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO INFER DUMB IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM THUS RULE VIOLATIIOKN

 

Wow. Triggered?