The winner of the 2020 Presidential election cannot be determined. There are so many illegally cast votes which have been counted that the outcome is indeterminate. That is what Matt Ballard has determined. If there is an electoral vote tie at 269 the House of Representatives decides the election with each state getting one vote. Trump would win 26 - 23. https://rumble.com/vbibwx-the-great-mail-in-ballot-heist-with-matt-braynard.html
After being exposed to Matt Braynard lately, I would say he is fool and anyone taking his word for something is the same. Of course, that's just my opinion.
Well, why vote at all? We can just let Matt determine the winner mathematically ... WTF, dude. Really?
The FBI is investigating based on his work. Had you listened to the video you would have known that and also would have understood his point.
The FBI will find nothing, assuming it's even looking, which I doubt. That's sleazy politics, not crime solving.
Dude - there is a reason I don't start threads on this board and why I have such a skeptical expression on my face - I don't believe ANYTHING I read on the internet or see on TV. I know the truth usually lies somewhere in the middle on these claims and I know the gullibility of the average person on the Internet. All you have to do is look at the long term accurate predictions on the threads here. Very few of them have been more than 50% accurate. On both sides.
I get most of my information from books which are fully referenced and footnoted. There is nothing new about the fraud that took place during the November third election. The only difference is the scale. And the fraud clearly happened.
I know... right? Kind of like that Steele guy you put the last four years of your faith in... Bruised??
Think about the data for a second. 6 swing states, and over 20% of mail in ballots were not requested, half of ballots not "received" by the election, and a sizable majority in states like PA GA and MI who didn't have legal residences. Gosh.... Talk about ballot stuffing..
As a former Trump staffer, Matt Braynard (not Ballard as you have it in your post) is very biased. His Voter Integrity Project has no integrity. And Charlie Kirk is so far to the right, he can't even see his own left hand. This thread is nothing more than a continuation of the ignorant, meritless, evidence-free bleatings of "massive voter fraud!" we've been hearing from Trump and those in his thrall. If there were any actual evidence, Trump's score in lawsuits so far wouldn't be 1 in 40.
Hard numbers not estimates dude. That is what he has and can be verified and why the FBI is interested.
I only attack them after I research them. I found yours to be without merit. If you want the truth about voter fraud in America, start here: https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud As for my source: the Heritage Foundation is a very conservative think tank, and they are very careful about their accuracy. As you can see, they report a grand total of 1,302 instances of voter fraud going back through several election cycles, with only 1,125 convictions. You can scroll down to the map and select a state. Happy reading, and may the truth finally sink in.
Try reading that article again and pay attention to what is actually being said. Then read the books “Stealing Elections” and “Who’s Counting”.
More of the same: A witness at the Michigan election integrity hearing alleged that all the military ballots she observed looked like "xerox copies" of each other. The witness said that none of ballots were from registered voters and all were for Democratic nominee Joe Biden. https://thepostmillennial.com/michi...ots-were-counted-that-looked-like-photocopies