We now arguably have the justification for shutting down Fox News, Breitbart, Newsmax, etc.

Tell me where I was wrong.

 

Indeed what you are suggesting is dictatorial/totalitarian - and a violation of the Rule of Law.

What part did you not understand ?

 

OH! Did MSNBC incite the insurgency in some way?

I will tell you that MSNBC publishes news and commentary, ALL OF WHICH complies with high standards of accuracy and professionalism. And anyone, .... ANYONE, ... who disagrees, I invite to find any intentional or repeated or even a single occurrence, of a lie broadcast by MSNBC in the last year.

 

No, it is clearly Trump who has lost his mind. He has always been a very unfit sociopath, but in the recent 12 months, if not longer, he has become completely unhinged, dangerous, an inciter of violence, attempted to undermine government to create his dictatorship, and is believed by many in government to be capable of doing far more damage in two weeks including possibly starting a nuclear war if he remains in office. But I guess you don't care.

 

Do you really not see a problem here?

 

No no. What part did YOU not understand. You commented on my post #225 but apparently you didn't read it. Try reading post 225.

 

The Fairness Doctrine was not about competition in the marketplace.

 

Name one.

 

I have seen it with my own eyes. I personally know ANTIFA members. AKs, bayonets, balaclavas, body armor, tactical gear, all the trappings of a paramilitary militia outfit. They have been training in anticipation of "the big day" and will not stand down until Trump is physically out of the White House. You can choose to believe me or not, I don't care. I know what I saw. I asked my ANTIFA friend "why AKs, why not ARs?" ARs are a better choice all around: they are easier to handle, easier to modify, ammunition is (normally) more readily available. The answer: "AR-15s are the tools of white capitalist oppressors, AK47s are the tools of freedom fighters."

 

Nov. 8, 2016

 

It does not have to be one or the other. I have had doubts about the democrats for some time since they were considering impeachment before Trump was inaugurated.

 

Only if the source is a political rival. The pot only wishes to silence the kettle.

 

good to know rightys won't have an easy time from here on out with further troublemaking

 

I have not heard any of them object to restrictions on free speech by FB or Twitter. I realize they are private companies and can do what they want, but they are a monopoly and are restricting access. That is as much a violation of free speech as you can get.

 

smart and caring people do that when called for, please don't make us do it over and over and over

 

Sure! Like I said (and thanks for confirming it), it's your opinion with zero documentation.

 

sing along with me! SILENCE IS GOLDEN

 

In other words, you can't prove me wrong.

 

But your partisan bias seems to prevent you from understanding WHY Dems were talking about impeachment and sanctions so early. You probably were one of the vast majority of those on the political right who didn't see any problem with Trump as he ran for office. I and most of the non-right DID.

 

in all words we're busy doing a MAGA BABY!

 

Do you work for MSNBC?? Sincere question. This sounds like their marketing statement, and it is so obviously untrue that it seems like you must be more invested in them than simply TV audience.

AKs are Russian made, correct?

 

Oh great, and I haven't heard one republican object to fascism, totalitarianism, despotism, or one-party dictatorship. I guess that makes republicans guilty of wanting those things, right?

 

Well then! If it is "obviously untrue", then I'm sure you can take me up on my suggestion and post evidence!!!

 

Well...perhaps...now you can see their point.

 

As a matter of fact, I did not vote for Trump in 2016.