Should National Guard Troops In DC Be Issued Live Ammunition?

Discussion in 'Opinion POLLS' started by Grau, Jan 16, 2021.

  1. Grau

    Grau Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2015
    Messages:
    9,061
    Likes Received:
    4,233
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I have mixed feelings about this.
    I feel that the National Guard Troops currently in DC should have been issued basic riot control equipment (shields, batons etc) rather than the M-4s and Beretta 9mms they have now been issued.
    Additionally, it's highly possible that these weapons could be snatched from National Guard troops in the event of an especially violent incident and a lost M-4 is far more lethal on the streets than a lost baton.
    Finally, I will admit that I don't know if the National Guard troops have or have not been issued live ammunition. I hope that question as well as other facts and opinions will be addressed in the following discussion.

    Thanks,
     
  2. DaveBN

    DaveBN Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2018
    Messages:
    9,063
    Likes Received:
    4,875
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Given what they could end up dealing with I’d say they should be issued weapons and ammunition. Ready condition should be condition 4. Chamber empty, empty magazine, hammer down. I’m not a fan of putting our service members in harms way without the means to protect themselves should things go bad.
     
  3. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,063
    Likes Received:
    32,877
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes
     
    Pollycy, MJ Davies and DaveBN like this.
  4. Grau

    Grau Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2015
    Messages:
    9,061
    Likes Received:
    4,233
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Naturally, the Kent State tragedy comes to mind especially to those old enough to remember it but the M-14s that were issued to the Ohio National Guardsmen was a far more effective club than the lighter M-4.
    I am seriously concerned that sending National Guardsmen into a riot with only an empty M-4 is just going to result in several lost / snatched M-4s.
     
  5. Jazz

    Jazz Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Messages:
    7,114
    Likes Received:
    1,192
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    I would straightout say, NO, they shouldn't be issued live ammunition! All they would kill would be their fellow Americans!
     
    LoneStarGal, Grau and Dayton3 like this.
  6. Capt Nice

    Capt Nice Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2017
    Messages:
    9,998
    Likes Received:
    10,217
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes, and as I've posted on another thread, communications should be simple and clear to any and everyone. Attempt to break any barrier you will be shot. End of problem.
     
    gabmux and MJ Davies like this.
  7. GrayMan

    GrayMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2010
    Messages:
    8,371
    Likes Received:
    3,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't think they will need to be used. Its a show of power. It's like Trump's position on foreign affairs. We need a strong military so that we don't have to use it. The threat is motivation enough.
     
  8. Jazz

    Jazz Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Messages:
    7,114
    Likes Received:
    1,192
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    I can agree to that... clear rules. But in this case it was almost a First and the authorities were more confused than the rioters.
    It could have ended up to be a much worse situation with more deaths. Thanks to the gentle rioters it went fairly smooth. It is now, afterwards, being blown up, mostly by Pelosi... she is going ballistic with her desire to do Trump in, hitting him with a double whammy of impeaching him as well as removing him from office.
     
    LoneStarGal, Grau and GrayMan like this.
  9. modernpaladin

    modernpaladin Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2017
    Messages:
    27,918
    Likes Received:
    21,226
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I don't see much point in deploying troops without arming them...
     
    gabmux, DaveBN and GrayMan like this.
  10. Jazz

    Jazz Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Messages:
    7,114
    Likes Received:
    1,192
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    So they can shoot a harmless lady veteran in the head??
     
    Esdraelon likes this.
  11. modernpaladin

    modernpaladin Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2017
    Messages:
    27,918
    Likes Received:
    21,226
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    If there isn't anyone there that needs to be shot, deploy the police instead of the military.
     
    gabmux likes this.
  12. Chrizton

    Chrizton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2020
    Messages:
    7,747
    Likes Received:
    3,803
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No. Let the police handle it.
     
  13. GrayMan

    GrayMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2010
    Messages:
    8,371
    Likes Received:
    3,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That was probably due to the police being overwhelmed by pure numbers and feeling threatened by it.

    I don't see veterans who volunteered to protect America from threats foreign and domestic, shooting the very people they are supposed to protect. Especially since no one will be a threat to this military force.
     
  14. GrayMan

    GrayMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2010
    Messages:
    8,371
    Likes Received:
    3,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I agree. Unfortunately there is little faith in the police. While the blame lies at the feet of the leaders, it doesn't change that fact.
     
  15. modernpaladin

    modernpaladin Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2017
    Messages:
    27,918
    Likes Received:
    21,226
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Aiui, she was shot by a bodyguard (unknown whether private or official) who's charge was no longer present. Which is a little suspicious...
     
    LoneStarGal likes this.
  16. dairyair

    dairyair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    78,908
    Likes Received:
    19,944
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    tRUMP wants war, I guess tRUMP gets war.
     
  17. modernpaladin

    modernpaladin Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2017
    Messages:
    27,918
    Likes Received:
    21,226
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The Nat Guard will be handicapped by precisely the same thing that the police are.
     
  18. dairyair

    dairyair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    78,908
    Likes Received:
    19,944
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Harmless?
    A harmless person isn't involved in storming the USA Capitol.

    Terrible she got shot, but overrunning armed police is not a wise choice.
     
    gabmux, MJ Davies and DaveBN like this.
  19. Jazz

    Jazz Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Messages:
    7,114
    Likes Received:
    1,192
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    No, normally they wouldn't.
    What should have happened is, the authorities should have stayed in place instead of hiding, and greet the rioters, especially Mrs. Pelosi, the leader, could have greeted the rioters, like "Hi, folks, how can we help you? What is on your mind?"

    Unfortunately, these people think they have to be rough and tough, instead of being calm and accommodating. The rioters probably would have been happy to sit down with Pelosi and her colleagues and tell them their grievances and what they felt should be done about the voter fraud etc. They could have come to a first step agreement of what to do the next morning.
    One thing has to be made clear to Pelosi... the rioters are not America's enemy, they are disappointed American citizens!! Likewise, Trump is not the enemy either! He only wants the best for the American people, he wants to make America great again!
    Why did the Dems constantly have to harass him the past four years? Why? Is it because Hillary Clinton lost and revenge had to be satisfied? It almost looks like that.
     
    joesnagg likes this.
  20. MJ Davies

    MJ Davies Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2020
    Messages:
    21,120
    Likes Received:
    20,249
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Absolutely.
     
  21. DaveBN

    DaveBN Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2018
    Messages:
    9,063
    Likes Received:
    4,875
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Poe’s Law.
     
  22. Jazz

    Jazz Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Messages:
    7,114
    Likes Received:
    1,192
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    I'm sure, from now on the Capitol will be barricaded like Fort Knox!
     
  23. Jazz

    Jazz Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Messages:
    7,114
    Likes Received:
    1,192
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Common sense.
     
  24. Dayton3

    Dayton3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Messages:
    25,412
    Likes Received:
    6,724
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Absolutely not. National Guardsman are not and have never been intended to serve as law enforcement.

    They should've be there at all. Tell the police to do their damned jobs.
     
    LoneStarGal likes this.
  25. Reasonablerob

    Reasonablerob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2018
    Messages:
    9,913
    Likes Received:
    3,878
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes, better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it.
     
    gabmux likes this.

Share This Page