Republicans standing for "as little free hand outs as possible" is not the same as being AGAINST free handouts!
You're just utterly nitpicking around to avoid my argument and troll off topic. It's obvious because you're not responding to it at all. So shallow. My point is a person not wearing a mask, because their own body their own choice, their freedom, to potentially kill somebody else with their covid ... we all know that them lot are usually the conservatives. Same group who demand pregnant women don't get that choice. Right wing conservatives only are against abortions, but ones born do not care about their lives by being against all kinds of subsidizing to help them if needed.
All you're good for is posting questions and putting a rofl smiley. That's not putting a dent in my argument.
You don't HAVE an argument without evidentiary support! By the way, the election was stolen! And I don't need to support that with evidence!
I'm not seeing any dent in my arguments when all you can do is ask a questions. People who say the election was stolen can go to court. But when they only are filing questions than it's tossed out.
WTF do you think I mean by , and was referring to with """ have said , no limits, no laws.""" Did you think I was talking about the legal drinking age? Are you still confused? It appears so...
Health......my wife had a problem when we first got married that if she did not get an abortion she would never be able to have kids, and the pregnancy she was in was very high risk for the baby anyway. We made a choice, a very hard and sad choice. But because we made that choice, we were able to have 2 boys that are happy healthy productive members of society today
Actually, this seems like a rather unique case. I've never heard of that before. I will use that scenario to challenge other pro-life people. Some might argue that the abortion shouldn't happen because as "high risk" as the pregnancy might be, there's still a chance that the baby is born perfectly healthy, and there's no guarantee that the mother will go on to become pregnant again and give birth, let alone twice. In your and your wife's case, you added two lives to the world when you very easily could have added none. So it would be difficult to make a pro-LIFE argument against your and your wife's decision, but only with the benefit of hind-sight.
I said you that you've NEVER been able to say that there should be no limit, not even 24 weeks. Which is interesting, because you believe that it is "her body, her choice", meaning that she should be able to get an abortion at any time and for any reason. You believe that her body never stops being her body, and therefore her choice never stops being her choice. So logically, you would have to say that a woman should be able to get an abortion at any time and for any reason, yet for some reason you've never been able to say that! And it's SO VERY TELLING!
It's simple: you don't HAVE an argument without evidentiary support! So I need evidence for my claims, but you don't need any evidence for yours?
I have stated many times """ no limits, no laws.""" If you persist in repeatedly saying I never said that, that is harassment and against the forum rules. Your inability to understand simple words like "no limits, no laws' is very telling and what THAT tells is quite pathetic...
But doctors have...and their opinion and the woman's opinion are the only ones that count....no one cares what stranger's opinion is of THEIR situation It's not relevant in any way..
Indeed. It's just trolling around if you want me to source that GOP is not keen on free handouts. And when this is all you got, than you've not put a dent into: My point is a person not wearing a mask, because their own body their own choice, their freedom, to potentially kill somebody else with their covid ... we all know that them lot are usually the conservatives. Same group who demand pregnant women don't get that choice. Right wing conservatives only are against abortions, but ones born do not care about their lives by being against all kinds of subsidizing to help them if needed. All you got is questions. No arguments.
What inconsistency. Your trying to play a gotcha game. Your trying to o get me to say that I agree with late term abortions. I DONT.....
Again, what happened to "her body, her choice?" Her body doesn't stop being her body at a certain point in the pregnancy does it? Therefore, logically, her choice never stops being her choice.
Peter Singer spoke of the right to terminate a child's life up until the age of 5. If people want to televise executions to "show" people the nature of capital punishment, can we also televise late term abortion?
So you've never asked anyone for evidence to prove their argument? It's simple: you don't have an argument without evidentiary support! Your argument, that right wing conservatives are "against all kinds of subsidizing to help" remains TOTALLY unsupported! TOTALLY unsupported!
Oh, well then I guess women and their doctor can arrange to have their BORN child killed. After all, the doctor's "opinion and the woman's opinion are the only ones that count. No one cares what stranger's opinion is of THEIR situation. It's not relevant in any way."
My apologies. Earlier when you said: I thought that you were saying that no such post could be found, and I thought that you were challenging me to find a post which doesn't exist. Alright then, so you've stated quite clearly that you don't think that there should be any limits or any laws for abortion. I don't believe that I have seen you state that so clearly, but now you have. Although, surely you believe that there should be laws which ensure the SAFETY of abortion.
