The Left's Crazed Revolution Is A Threat To All

From Dr Seuss' last book, Little little Red Pill...

 

I remember conservatives doing that. Which Democrats burned books?

 

Democrats Ask Teachers To Destroy Books Written By ‘Climate Deniers’

 

No he not supposed to do that; he is supposed to explain to the nation a looming health crisis based on what his health experts are saying, and outline the steps needed to deal with the crisis.

 

We have the technology to create a near 100% waste recycling industry, certainly R&D will complete the task.

The problem is a dysfunctional Western economic system in which money creation is confined to private banks operating in purely profit driven-driven free markets.

Guess what: profit-driven competitive free markets don't/can't take account of ecological sustainability, because private sector players ARE competitors. Only the public sector can manage ecological sustainability.

 

And no investigation was done by any. To state that x is so without providing any evidence does not constitute proof.

 

I understand exactly what he did. He gave a standard old school pep talk and before he finished a riot started a 40 minute walk away.

 

they still teach the history, they just don't name schools after them

I am more concerned about the crazy right trying to start a civil war and take over our government via insurrection

 

Trump was the most Hitler like leader we have had in a long time, let's just be thankful most Americans voted him out

 

I have to admit that is not the appropriate response to climate deniers.

The best response is to kill two birds with one stone, ie, explain why it is necessary to change the current economic orthodoxy required to deal with the looming ecological/environmental catastrophe.... as the free market increasingly tests the planet's ecological limits.
Note: competitive private sector players CAN'T deal with this issue alone, because they are ...competing for profit.

(link)

Economic Stimulus Is an Environmental Disaster Waiting to Happen (foreignpolicy.com)

"A public jobs guarantee is the only way to provide economic recovery without endangering the climate".

[I would change the word "climate" to 'health and the environment'; extraction and burning of oil and coal is increasingly harmful to both].

 

Yes it did and was an even greater evil.

 

1st by the time he left the hospital everyone already knew that. 2nd we already had plenty of evidence that lockdowns were a day late and dollar short solution. In other words they didn't do anything other than bankrupt small businesses, cause kids to commit suicide, and generally screw up everyone's life.

2nd in January China was still lying to us about human to human transmission. By the end of January we knew that was bs and acted appropriately in banning travel to China. Unfortunately by then it was too late, some where between three and five months too late, and the shut down strategy was also too late by an additional 2 months. In the end the only thing lock downs did in addition to those already mention was keep sick people away from hospitals.

 

Reality says otherwise. This is why trump lost.

 

Idiocy and lies say other wise but then idiocy, lies, and paranoia is why Trump lost.

 

Nonsense the public sector can't manage to wipe it's butt without getting crap all over everything.

Expecting power brokers to not become increasingly corrupt over time is like expecting flies to not produce maggots.

 

Close but no cigar. Book burnings involve taking the books out of existence, not the classroom.

 

What? It's up to the plaintiffs to do their own investigations. Did they not investigate? Who exactly do you think should investigate? Joe Friday maybe?

 

demonstrably false.

can't prove a negative. onus is on trumpets to prove the election was rigged. Over 60 lawsuits have shown you that there was no fraud, or that the election was rigged. All of the bodies I listed conducted investigations and found no fraud.

 

Do they really think people are that naive? Trump and his following would never accept the results of any investigation. Not even if God told them so. Sad.

 

Wrong on both counts.

 

Really? You mean those 61 court cases were ruled in Trump's favor? I think you're mistaken.

 

None of them were evidence hearings almost all decided on the basis of standing or other legal technicalities that meant the evidence never even made it into the courtroom.

 

Ya think?

 

Hmm no. We never agreed to your hyper specific definition of "taking the books out of existence." What does that even mean? If even one book escapes Bradbury's firemen, then everything is fine?

 

You are welcome to prove so. You of course know you can not, as I am objectively correct, which is why you were unable to prove so in your reply.