FBI Chief Refutes Claims ANTIFA Was at Capitol Riot

You missed his picture, too? It was all over the place. I suggest you get out more often.

One political speech does not an insurrection make, either, especially if the speech said or implied nothing about any insurrection..

 

We are not talking about our political speech and the word insurrection does not need to be used. Donnie D started his Big Lie about the election will be stolen in June 2020 and after the election he continued lying but the big lies changed to " election was stolen".

I will believe the head of the FBI over some political hack who claims to have a picture that may not exist or very well is a fabrication.

I deal in facts not probably made up Schiest.

 

I think there needs to be a certain amount of members there to say "ANTIFA" was there. From the reports I've read, there were only a few. IMO this doesn't say to me ANTIFA was there. I'm not defending them, but this is suspect. a few people does not = the group ANTIFA was there

 

They have dared to contradict the Dear Leader! Sacrilege! Blasphemy! Orange Man God!

 

Your not serious ? Holder had Obamas back on legal issues. Sessions also did that for Trump.Sessions recused himself because what the president asked was illegal. And ultimately was WHY the special counsel was appointed.

 

Evidently not. Which Schiester was it that you think took the police blotter picture?

 

Trump's greatest errors came early on with his faulty idea of maybe mending fences by hiring enemies or enemy-like people.

 

Who cares. I stand by my confidence in our FBI director. EOS!

 

What the hell are you talking about??????

 

So people dressed in black from head to toe who getbaround in white buses are ANTIFA?

 

Strange how Trump never used his power to go after his enemies like the previous administration. He could've seen Pelosi and Schumer's private texts to each other and released them to the NYT. Although the NYT would immediately burn them and deny their existence.

 

Or the old "The truth is what I say it is"

 

It must be great to be able to clue us dumb people in about what's really going on:

 

Read my words better.

 

Wray spoke facts. Johnson read an opinion.
Facts triumph over opinion.

 

Thing is I did so my post is the direct response to the last sentence in yours.

 

Lets's see a reliable shred of evidence that ANY Antifa members were involved in the insurrection.

 

If you have to have that explained to you, then you haven’t been paying attention.

I’m not going to give you a history lesson, exa=Celt to say you probably need to find new sources of truth

 

I said others said it. And, I also said, "I saw that they retracted calling them AntiFa, but I didn't have time to read who they were."
Perhaps you can view it.

 

If Wray can deny antifa is organized, then of course he can deny they were there in any organized way.
https://nypost.com/2020/09/17/gop-blasts-fbi-director-for-claiming-antifa-not-an-organization/

 

I apologize I misread it.

 

Hmm.. that's new for you. Trusting senior public officials and all.... here's the coolest thing though, time stamped streamed video by said BLM/Antifa folks from the event. Lives forever on the internet, regardless of your faith in Christopher Wray.

 

Never happened.

 

Get real. Wray said no evidence that ANTIFA or BLM was part of the Trump terrorist assault force. What if FBI informants were on video will Trump lie and claim that the FBI staged this thing?

Hell yes I and most every honest American stands by our FBI. Director. Trump and his minions can stand by their QANON freaks.

 

Did Wray actually call it the "Trump assault force"? Or did you just add your own propaganda color and attribute it to him? Why does it strike you so that you're entirely unwilling to acknowledge that the democrats and their brownshirts were there actively fomenting the violence?