I'm interested in hearing more about these"contemporary scientific facts" you claim states that Israel is part of the African continent....please, I need a good chuckle.
Nah, not all of them, just the racist ones that feed their ppl eurocentric falsehoods. They must really take their ppl for fools.
Are you..well until you learn to be respectful, YOU will have to wait since the mods are delaying over deleting your personal insults.
I don't know why you so complicate, & therefore get confused by, straightforward, simple ideas. For example, we know for a hard fact, that there was a Jewish genocide, that occurred just in the last century. Did that result in the disappearance of the Jewish people, or in a drastic change in their racial make-up? I don't think so. Therefore, your raising this idea, unless they were essentially exterminated in the past, as a race, is a moot point; which is why I specified, "full genocide." Secondly, your quoting of a bible verse as to people of a certain region being the sons of Ham, or whatever, is not ethnological proof of your contentions. Thirdly, your assertions take a major shift, in your response. I thought we were only discussing one person, Jesus, who I admitted need not to have had the same complexion as the majority of Hebrews. Now, you are trying to pronounce the entire Hebrew population, at that time, to have been dark-skinned? Without a single scientific source, your claims come across as rather fanciful, since you have yet to have even proven that Jesus was black. Finally, I don't know what to make, other than utter ignorance, of your confusion between my differentiation of North African, "black," skin as opposed to Central African, "black," skin color. Just as a reminder, focusing this discussion on skin color, specifically, was your idea. Now, you are faulting me, for trying to conform to your rules? To clear up your misunderstanding, the type of black that comedian Eddie Murphy calls, "original black," is much, much, darker than the black of Northern Africans, in general, as well as most non-African blacks (as African-Americans who have more than a generation or two of ancestors in this country). That complexions vary, in all places is, as far as I can see, neither here nor there, to your argument (unless you have specific evidence for the particular person or group of whom you are making your claim). In fact, that point about variation in shade undercuts the argument you've been making, up to this point. Namely, the "white," Jesus we typically seen pictured, could, hypothetically, have Negroid genes since, as you make a point of, in your reply, "Nigerian ppl range from the most lily white "black" ppl you can imagine to the most dark black. its just semantics, nobody cares how "black" the israelites were, just that they were black of all shades." (To the contrary, your objection to Jesus' complexion in religious representations indicates that YOU care). So should it now be understood that your premise for this thread has nothing to do with the color of Jesus's skin, but instead is completely about whether or not Jesus' genes were of the Negroid race? Because, you have certainly not proven that, nor that Hebrews were Negroid, genetically-speaking. And I doubt that actual, "proof," of either of these contentions even exists. Using reason, however, the most LOGICAL deduction from what is known, is that if Jesus had, "black genes," he was multi-racial. P.S.-- the only, "umbrage," I feel is directly tied to your false statements/conclusions about me, which have zero rational basis. The next time you want to claim something akin to, "YOU SEEM TO TAKE GREAT UMBRAGE that the israelites were similar in appearance to west africans," please supply the statement or statements which, in your opinion, make it, "seem," as you allege. Otherwise, you will only be confirming not only that you speak out of ignorance, but that you slander-- or blackball, if you prefer-- others with insupportable, defamatory charges.
Awww....did your flame baiting and the responses it garners, cause you to hit the report button? You cant back your absurd claim, just admit it. We can all see it. And calling you to task is not "personal insults"....you insult our basic intelligence by claiming such absurd garbage as "Isreal is in Africa"...But I dont run and cry to mods.
So you finally figured out what this thread is all about. Good for you. Boy do ihave some treats for you naysayers.
According to Psalms 45:2, the Messiah is "fairer than the children of men". Lamentations 4:7 says "Her Nazarites were purer than snow, they were whiter than milk."
Speaking about overreach and accusations of white supremacy... Why stop at Israel. Why not gobble up the entire middle east, Asia, and Europe. Africa is a hungry boy, eh? Or you could go the other way and say that Africa is part of Asia by way of Egypt, and make Asia the insatiable pit. (I think that I would like a bite of everything in the store.) Seriously, calling Israel part of Africa is a stretch. It is not on the main continent. The people have different features and color than Africans. And they have a different and unique language, religion and customs compared to continental African nations. Neither Israel nor the United Nations considers Israel part of Africa. Why is it so important to you that Jesus be black, and Israel be part of Africa? And why the animus towards white achievement and perseverance. Is there not enough wickedness among others?
Jesus was not white skin, blond hair and blue eyes. he was also most likely not black African, as most Israelites were not black African. this is a dumb and sad thread.
hebrew is an Afro-asiatic language. Did you see that? Afro, we all know what that means. Different features and colours? Really bro, look at the white regions of south africa where no blacks are allowed. As for not on the main continent, ive already stated that israel is on the african continent geologically speaking and idont subscribe to the eurocentric geoPOLITICAL opinion that israel is asian. It is, has been and always will be AFRO first. The europeans tried to separate it physically from africa by building the suez canal but intellects Know and we know that israel the land is physically moving away from asia due to the movement of the great rift valley and that is a geological fact also
So where do you believe that the continent of Africa ends, and the continent of Asia begins. In the beginning, according to archaeologists, there was one land mass over 300 million years ago. And it had no known name. So a modern white guy named it Pangea. More recently it was probably whites who named the continent Africa. It's true name, by indigenous peoples, is Alkebulan, Mother of mankind. Then again, people everywhere refer to the earth as Mother earth, because she sustains us and is our home.
Yes, the quote notification is a great indicator..... Anyhow, saying Israel is in Africa is a laughable claim.
It ends in israel on the rift valley. Syria and jordan are the other side of the border, on the asia tectonic plate. The ancient african kingdom of km.t created israel as a gateway or fort complex to defend against the invading asiatics. This is why israel called upon tarharqa of km.t to defend the region from assyrian invasions which is documented in the holy scriptures.
I dont give a damn about Europe, I'm just here to be entertained by such absurd claims. You have an obvious agenda in this thread. Here, I found something that can help you, you will notice no African countries even start with the letter "I" much less Israel..... But I'm sure we can depend on you to tell us it's just some "white man's, eurocentric conspriacy" or some such.... How about this? Post one single remotely credible source that backs your absurd claim. List of countries in Africa in alphabetical order https://www.countries-ofthe-world.com › countries-of-a... List of countries in Africa · R · Rwanda · S · Sao Tome and Principe · Senegal · Seychelles · Sierra Leone · Somalia ...
You might as well claim it's in "Wakanda" both claims have equal basis in "reality"...which is to say, no where outside of the land of make believe.
The "topic" has been debunked, this is the most real "Black Jesus" you will ever see. I thought it funny as hell, but the producers must have disagreed as it did not last long. Guess the left demanded it be cancelled. They even put white man hair on him.
If you're talking about the list of African countries Ivory Coast is not a country it's a name for a region in Africa
Those whites' features are not indigenous to Africa, bro-- they are descendants of settlers from the Netherlands & Great Britain. How do you not know that? I'm still waiting for those treats you promised.
