Gov. Little signs ‘Fetal Heartbeat Bill’ into law, protecting the lives of the preborn

FoxHastings said: ↑
NO, the intention of Democrats is to PROTECT women from evil people who want to take away their rights...

TRY logic, why TF would Democrats harass you??? ...unless you were harassing someone else????

Democrats would ignore you and others if you just kept your ideas to yourselves and didn't try to shove them down other's throats..

What "accusation"?
I stated facts....it just might have felt like an accusation if the shoe fit

OH GOODY, you said something true!!!

..and then ruined it by posting something silly and meaningless...

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
NO, the intention of Democrats is to PROTECT women from evil people who want to take away their rights...

TRY logic, why TF would Democrats harass you??? ...unless you were harassing someone else????

Democrats would ignore you and others if you just kept your ideas to yourselves and didn't try to shove them down other's throats..

DUH, this is a discussion forum...people discuss things...

If you weren't so against women having rights then maybe no one would respond...

...if you don't want a response , don't post.....you have every right to stop posting at any time...

 

https://gov.idaho.gov/pressrelease/...into-law-protecting-the-lives-of-the-preborn/

This certainly looks good to me.

What do you think of this idea that could be useful to many parents over the coming years and decades?



Would a Basic Minimum Income dramatically reduce abortions?



?
Will a Minimum Basic Income dramatically reduce the incidence of abortions?

1. 
   Perhaps by 1- 10 percent over the present rate.
   4 vote(s)
   50.0%
2. 
   Perhaps by 11 to twenty percent over the present rate.
   0 vote(s)
   0.0%
3. 
   Perhaps twenty one to thirty percent over the present rate.
   1 vote(s)
   12.5%
4. *
   Perhaps by even more than by thirty percent?
   3 vote(s)
   37.5%

Change Your Vote

 

So called FREE money always sounds good. But so does robbing banks sound good because you can do it now, no need to get the approval of Democrats.

FREE incomes do seem lovely. As I say a lot of things sound lovely. I would love to own one of those 600 ft. yachts too. I want a Mansion. I promise to be a good citizen if you give me yachts and free mansions.

Why stop at $500 per month?

 

It is sad that LARCs are out of reach for many people

 

yes poverty has nothing to do with it

 

What Child ? you projecting the future onto the past mate. There is no "Child" in the early stages of pregnancy.

 

You solved the abortion issue by saying she had no need for one since it was no child.

 

Never said anything of the sort. Do you nave have better than making up nonsense and attributing it to others ... or is it that you are having trouble understanding what a Child is ?

 

I was being sarcastic over your defending Abortion.

 

Of course I am defending abortion - in the early term .. this is the abortion section sport - one comes here to defend one side or the other.

What did you come here for - if not to defend your position on abortion ?

 

I literally hate discussing abortions.
1. The Supreme Court ruled it is legal.
2. The legislatures at the federal level have taken no action.
I am pleased our Governor put a stop to at least some abortions.

 

OK - so it pleases you to be able to force your religious beliefs on others through physical violence = Law.

Are you a fan of Sharia - enforcing levitical law and all that good stuff ?

 

Who's forcing you?

Why?

So at least some women suffer?

 

I do not mind questions. But not statements such as (So at least some women suffer?)
1. Nobody forces me.
2. Women should never be forced to suffer nor their unborn child.

 

I am LDS but do not expect nor want force to be used to share the religion. I do not propose anything to force others into my religion.

 

What! Yet YOU want women to suffer, to be forced to gestate....WTF ???

Can't you make up your mind...???

Aborted FETUSES do not suffer...….unwanted kids, DO.

 

Then you're against banning abortion...right?

 

Yeah you did .. you want the state to use violence to force your abortion beliefs on others .. and your belief is based on religious belief. - as you sure as heck cant argue your way out of a wet paper bag using non religious justification which would be legitimate on the basis of law/founding principles - by your own admission ..

so what is it then .. Law just because you don't like something ? - did you figure that to be legitimate justification to want to force your abortion beliefs on others through physical violence ? What's up ...

 

Let me know if you ever want an honest discussion. I mean snark free discussion.

 

Abortion unfortunately is here due only to a Supreme Court ruling. Similar to the Dredd Scott decision and the then decision on income taxes. I prefer adults act alike adults and those not wanting to have children, use the medical help of their doctor to teach them if they do not get it by this time.

 

run away now .. as you started with snark.

 

LOL....ya, the Supreme Court invented abortion in 1973....nobody ever heard of it before ..

What anyone "prefers" doesn't always jibe with real life...get over it, adults do.

 

Then you're against banning abortion...right?

 

You are doing a splendid job arguing against your own comments. Keep doing it.