Antifa celebrates the murder of a policeman

Call it what you want, but that’s not what prosecutors are calling it.

 

Links?

 

The Schieze Kopfs in Congress created this drug war trash to protect the Richman's drug profits, and to deny the American People of most of their Rights.
Since the Patriot Act, we do not have rights any more. We have privileges removable at any time.
America is now in a Kerenski democracy waiting for the killings to escalate dramatically.
And most us are too deluded to confess our wrongs and repent. So no salvation or healing of the land is in sight.

 

[QUOTE="Steve N, post: 1072808350, Many of the instructionists plainly said they went there to overthrow OUR Government.[/QUOTE]

Originally, "government" meant people wanting an official job, who consented to be governed by the American Man.
The American People still have, outside of lawyers and politicians, the Right to overthrow Their governed men.

Declaration of Rights, 1774 A.D. "the American People never consented to being governed."

 

Link for evidence? You'd think such would be splashed all across all news media if so many said such. Yet I haven't seen it. And no, I don't watch Fox.

 

It was on the news, google it - or not.

 

It was, but probably not faux so you probably missed it.

 

Seriously? I specifically told you I don't watch Fox (something I've said multiple times overtime across many threads btw). And then you try to assert that I do...... so predictable. In other words you don't actually have evidence of such. If you had then you would have linked to it.

 

Trump appears to have been hoping he could delay certification, then pressure some states into refusing to certify, enough to deny Joe a majority of electors and thus toss the election into the House. I see no reason the guy won't try it again in 2024 if he can get the Republican nomination should he project to lose the Electoral College vote if all the states certify.

SCOTUS may have to save the country from Trump.

If you folks supporting Trump dislike this country enough you would support him while he attempts to destroy it, I would like to know what you think would better serve us.

 

You folks brought Antifa into it when the Orange Oaf claimed they were involved.

Trump appears to have encouraged the riot to stop Congress from certifying the election.

 

Whatever dude, I barely notice you.

 

The definition of the word: a violent uprising against an authority or government. I think it qualifies.

 

I'll take that as your surrender.

 

Then any riot by BLM members or Antifa members would be considered that. Yet they are just considered riots. CHAZ would have been considered it. Yet they weren't. Along with all the other "autonomous zones".

 

This a discussion board, not a fist fight; cheese and rice.

 

yet you cared enough to reply

 

Did you notice the date of the article? January 14, 2015. Yet, the article is written as if the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street movements were still on going. Take this line for instance:

"Occupy Wall Street jumped on the bandwagon only recently, encamping in a Lower Manhattan park in late September, just a block away from the symbolic home of their perceived enemies."

The Occupy Wall Street movement died in 2012. Three years after the article was published. The writer, took one common point, and tried to claim that one point was the main issue for both organizations. The fact is the Tea Party was formed during the 2008 elections. Prior to Obama being elected, and before the TARP program was even launched.

Here is, according to Wikipedia, the goals of Occupy Wall Street:

"OWS's goals included a reduction in the influence of corporations on politics,[39] more balanced distribution of income,[39] more and better jobs,[39] bank reform[25] (especially to curtail speculative trading by banks[40]), forgiveness of student loan debt[39][41] or other relief for indebted students,[42][43] and alleviation of the foreclosure situation.[44] Some media labeled the protests "anti-capitalist",[45] while others disputed the relevance of this label.[46]

Some protesters favored a fairly concrete set of national policy proposals.[47][48] One OWS group that favored specific demands created a document entitled the 99 Percent Declaration,[49] but this was regarded as an attempt to "co-opt" the "Occupy" name,[50] and the document and group were rejected by the General Assemblies of Occupy Wall Street and Occupy Philadelphia.[50]

During the occupation in Liberty Square, a declaration was issued with a list of grievances. The declaration stated that the "grievances are not all-inclusive" "

Now compare that to the Tea Party. About Tea Party | Tea Party. I encourage you to follow the link, because there is too much relevant information to cut and paste here. But here is their opening statement:

"The Tea Party are those who possess a strong belief in the Judeo-Christian values embedded in our great founding documents. We believe the responsibility of our beloved nation is etched upon the hearts of true Patriots from every race, religion, national origin, and walk of life sharing a common belief in the values which made and keep our beloved nation great. This belief led to the creation of the modern-day Tea Party.

Our millions of members consist of Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians, and Independents who identify with the premises set forth by the U.S. Constitution and we are striking a chord and ringing true with the American Spirit.

We stand by the Constitution as inherently conservative."

Hardly, identical organizations, origins or goals.

 

Wow, no comment huh?

 

Bored middle class white misfits, looking for validation. Desperate to be down with the browns, bless their empty heads.

 

It is absurd of you to claim that. Especially since there are so many published statements, tweets and Facebook posts of Democrats supporting ANTIFA. Can you find a single Democrat that actually denounces terrorist group?

You know, I have heard that statement a lot. Some that make that claim try to paint the picture that there were no violent George Floyd riots. That is called being delusional. Other admit that there was violence, looting and arson, but they try to absolve BLM by claiming that there is no proof that those committing the crimes are actually linked to the organization. That is called a cop-out. If you throw a party, you are responsible for the actions of your party goers. If violence happens during several parties, and that is not what you want, you would make a statement calling for an end to the violence. Yet, the BLM stages the protests, and then make no statements to keep them peaceful. As a matter of fact, rhetoric used at the protests are designed to incite the violence.

No, but I bet you are the fat body with no shirt on. Come on. Admit it. That's you isn't it?


[QUOTE="LangleyMan, post: 1072808280, member: 76487"BLM <> Antifa.

The people rioting, looting, trashing, burning, etc. should be put in jail for a long time. Peaceful protest? Okay. I'm not a fan of protests, but folks have their rights.[/QUOTE]

Unfortunately, or current judicial system will jail conservative protester for months without bail, but will release and drop the charges against liberal protesters. I fully support lawful peaceful protests. You know the ones where a permit is obtained, and keep the peace. The problem is that BLM and ANTIFA have made a name of meeting lawful peaceful protests with violent counter-protests. Then the liberals claim that the counter-protesters were justified.

 

There's a game some partisan liberals play where they take the vile and hateful posts made on the internet by people identifying as Trump supports, and then act as if they've demonstrated something about Trump supporters.

And that's what's going on here with Antifa. Seriously, how hard do you find it to find hateful internet posts by people claiming to be Trump supporters?

 

Except it wasn't Kelly said it and more people said he didn't than Said he did.

 

But not enough to dispute the opinion.

I was being polite, answering a question. What I don't care about is your opinions on this topic.

 

ok, lol, but your still replying to my posts, so you must care

 

My mistake, he told Kelly, to his face while standing at the grave of Kelley's son at Arlington, "I don't get it what's in it for them?". It takes a cold heart to say that to a father at his son's grave.

But, right, it was FOUR White house senior staff that reported Benedict Donald calling war dead "suckers and losers" because he was afraid the bad weather would mus his hair.