Australia records 10 times more deaths following Covid shots.....

Laughable ! as the so called "unbiased" antenna of YOUR Tin Foil Hat has
....................................................................................... been found to be BENT in one direction

MEDIA BIAS FACTCHECK




Consider the Source

MEDIA BIAS FACK CHECK - Itself has been found to be a BOGUS Astroturf Site -
Dominated by the SUBJECTIVE and poisoned delusions of one Dave Van Zandt. -
A nut case Glued to the Establishments Narrative on pretty much every Issue
Cutting a line for Corporate & CIA inspired Propaganda



+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"Media Bias Fact Check" Is a Major SCAM to Silence the Right
https://www.independentsentinel.com/media-bias-fact-checking-scam-silence-right/

Bogus "Media Bias Fact-Check" Site Used by Google Lists All
Conservative Outlets as “Low Credibility” – But Lists All Far
Left and Liberal Mainstream Outlets as High Credibility
https://stillnessinthestorm.com/202...eral-mainstream-outlets-as-high-credibility//


‘MEDIA BIAS/FACT CHECK’ Site Fails Fact Check
https://principia-scientific.com/media-bias-fact-check-site-fails-psi-fact-check/
Discredited self-styled ‘fact checker’ website is served with a ‘cease and desist’
legal notice today for publishing unsubstantiated and defamatory claims against
Principia Scientific International (PSI).


‘Media Bias/Fact Check’
Site Served With Cease And Desist, Gets Fact-Checked
https://climatechangedispatch.com/media-bias-fact-check-site-served-cease-and-desist/

Can you trust what "Media Bias/Fact Check"
says about PolitiFact? (Updated x2)
https://www.politifactbias.com/2017/10/can-you-trust-what-media-biasfact-check.html
.
Media Bias Fact Check: Incompetent or Dishonest?
https://www.justfactsdaily.com/media-bias-fact-check-incompetent-or-dishonest
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


.

 

Conspiracy theorists hate being exposed, so of course they laugh at people checking their bias. You can use media bias checkers to validate your views of sources like CNN, MSNBC etc and it will tell you what you they are what they are, - left leaning outlets.

As for the source in question, all one has to do is read what they write and learn that it is in fact "tin foil hat" nonsense. You can do you own bias checks.

Do you believe 9/11 was false flag operation? The source says it was.
Do you believe Israel is the bad guy? The source says it is.
Do you believe in "chemtrails"? The source does.

This is not the first time they have been exposed pushing anti-vaccine nonsense,

 

Why do you expect the CDC to give us reports on individual cases? I suspect that they're working the results into their general guidelines. If their investigations indicated that the vaccine was causing thousands of deaths then they would stop recommending vaccination. Please keep in mind that, at this point, billions of doses of the vaccine have been administered worldwide. Hundreds of millions have been administered in this country alone. Those reporting sites don't screen in any way. If someone gets vaccinated today and has a heart attack tomorrow then someone can report it. If someone gets vaccinated today and then has a heart attack tomorrow then their wife could report it, their brother could report it, and their neighbor from down the street could report it and it would count as three separate incidents. The site even says that it's a reporting site and that no conclusions should be drawn from any reports that are posted.

 

If you are 70 it makes sense why you might choose to get vaccinated. I am surprised so many are willing to subject their children to the larger risk of the shots though.

 

LOL. Over 8000 people have died shortly after vaccination and you're saying that the CDC doesn't give a damn about 8000 individual cases, even though this could be a public health crisis?

 

Thanks for the correction, I appreciate it.

 

No, I'm saying that, just because you can't find reports on individual investigations doesn't mean that they haven't occurred. Also, please keep in mind that tracking sites usually list people who have died AFTER receiving the covid vaccine, not people who have died FROM receiving the covid vaccine.

 

Your faith in the false statements of career bureaucrats with vested interests is noted. You show the same faith, it seems, in pharma companies concerned only with profits, companies like Pfizer who've pleaded guilty at least twice to criminal fraud charges.

Yes, you're on solid ground when it comes to critical thinking.

 

Unfortunately actual data does not support the narrative that the majority hospitalized with Covid are unvaccinated. In countries that have high vaccination rates the majority hospitalized are vaccinated.

 

When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.

When you know you're wrong, always attack the messenger.

 

I will be 74 next week, and there is no way I'm taking the clot shot. That so many children are being sacrificed at the Pharma Altar by their parents illustrates well how over populated the planet is with humans.

 

Can you provide links to this data? I'm not finding it.

 

You are probably "searching" only on mainstream media.

I've seen dozens of articles and whistleblowers who point out the connections between high vaccination rates followed by high infection rates.

Sorry I don't have a link this morning, I'm in a hurry.

 

No hurry. I'll wait. I'm searching official health sites by the way.

 

So you created a thread titled "Truth Being Ignored – Victoria Australia Records 867 New COVID Cases, 375 in Hospital and 95% of Th..." then run away from your own thread when shown that what you wrote was nonsense then you repeat this nonsense in another thread! This is your MO

Here, just for you once again:

 

Here is but one article about that, in this case Harvard's experience. Despite 95% Vaccination Rate, Harvard Experiences 'Substantial Outbreak' of COVID (humansarefree.com)

There is a better illustration with graphs of many countries around the world, dates versus vaccination rates. I'll try to find it again. In virtually every country around the world, what follows aggressive vaccination programs is aggressive rates of infection.

 

The claim was about hospitalization not cases

 

I'm trying to show bits of the proverbial Big Picture, just in case you might be interested.

All around the world, including Harvard and Illinois high schools, aggressive vaccination programs are followed by aggressive infection rates.

Being in denial about it changes nothing.

 

You just started an entire thread based on an article too lazy to check the claims it was based on. If you want to make a claim like that link to credible data. Then compare the damage being done by the virus to nations with low vaccination rates.

Now, we all know there is literally zero chance you will do any of that, so waste someone else's time.

 

That article doesn't say anything about relative rates of hospitalization. Everyone knows, and the government and pharma companies have said, that the vaccines aren't necessarily going to prevent everyone from getting infected. They'll reduce the likelihood, but not prevent it.

 

That is what they would have you believe, but they are highly skilled manipulators of the public perception, skilled at the art of deception, to borrow from Mick Jagger.

Snake oil salesmen are very much practiced at the art of deception, and today's pharmaceutical companies are yesterday's snake oil salesmen.

 

Money! Political pressure and liabilities, hang tight, the truth is juts around the corner!!

 

Cause of death has already been proven "Manipulated", hospital incentives rendered them useless! You or I and the world will never be privy to that data because if it weren't manipulated it was simply ignored..

 

The truth is always just around the corner with conspiracy theories. Have a lovely day.