30 Percent of Republicans Say True Americans May Have to Resort to Violence to Save U.S.

The incompetence comes from the inability to find something that does.

 

OK. Fine point.

 

Even assuming that figure is from a reliable source (which is at best doubtful) it means 82% of scientist's are not Marxist. So problem solved.

 

These vaccines are pretty good.

The latest from British Columbia:

Past week cases (Nov. 5-11) – Total 3,445

• Not vaccinated: 1,890 (54.9%)
• Partially vaccinated: 181 (5.3%)
• Fully vaccinated: 1,374 (39.9%)

Past two weeks cases hospitalized (Oct. 29 to Nov. 11) – Total 336

• Not vaccinated: 202 (60.1%)
• Partially vaccinated: 23 (6.8%)
• Fully vaccinated: 111 (33.0%)

Past week, cases per 100,000 population after adjusting for age (Nov. 5-11)

• Not vaccinated: 241.0
• Partially vaccinated: 69.9
• Fully vaccinated: 31.4

Past two weeks, cases hospitalized per 100,000 population after adjusting for age (Oct. 29 to Nov. 11)

• Not vaccinated: 40.8
• Partially vaccinated: 14.4
• Fully vaccinated: 2.4

https://news.gov.bc.ca/releases/2021HLTH0071-002172

Would you rather have a recession far worse than 2008-2009? If we don't get the new covid case count way down, we're going to lose a lot of service sector jobs. Is that what you're prepared to accept if we don't (yet) have effective treatments?

These are important choices.

We have the information we need about the safety and efficacy of the vaccines. Vaccination or vaccine passports to save the economy.

You're way off the mark. I wonder about your understanding of economics.

An unjustified conclusion.

 

Maybe 20% of university profs in sociology. Certainly not 20% of historians or economists.

 

I was just correcting your math.

 

Millions think the other way

 

None of which either party promotes.

Obviously, you don't understand them or what they actually support. I do because I worked with liberals in public school education.

 

The thing you have to consider here why. Did the far left grow out of nothing or did the far right with the willing ignorance of the public refuse to address the growing body of evidence that racism was overt and growing?
Whilst I agree the backlash has gone too far, you should atleast try to understand the reasons behind it.

 

Thank you for confirming my point of view. The denial of obvious facts Lack of forethought (planning) and inability to see consequences of actions those are apparent symptoms.

 

I pulled together the incredibly dumb comments you made about "progressives." Accusing them of promoting sexual perversion and pederasty is bizarre and may say more about you than it does about them.

BTW, there are no "open borders." This is an "open border"...


France-Germany border

This is not.


USA-Mexico border, Tijuana

Progressives haven't suggested we have open borders.

 

Bless the Trump-worshipping hearts.

 

No, they are doing what they have always done historically.
History speaks for itself

 

Are you unfamiliar with the year 1776 and the events that happened in the several years before and after it?

 

Yes I am familiar with 1776 and the happenings that went along with it. I am familiar with the Revolutionary War and how the USA won it's freedom from Britain. I know my U.S. History very well like all Americans should.

 

You are aware, are you not, of who the person was who originally coined that phrase, right?

 

I wonder what percentage of Democrat Americans say True Americans May Have To Resort to Violence to Save U.S. ? Don't you just hate one sided slanted news?

 

Yes, it was Jeffie. He was talking about revolutions, and not only the one in US. Why?

 

11%. It was in the article, which you call one sided.

 

The very presence of this forum, and the many topics, threads, and posts herein that directly dispute your statement infers that if you truly believe what you said here, you are blind or foolish. Some esoteric textbook a century from now may reach a conclusion like that and be right about it (though I even doubt that), but to say it is "Universally Accepted" on this date in 2021 calls your very sanity into question.

 

That statement is meaningless, but does sound good.

 

Would news reports from the leftist media not be historical events?
Larry Elder is the Black face of White Supremacy
Biden claiming Kyle Rittenhouse is a White Supremist
The left pushing CRT in our schools
The actual existence of BLM and what they really stand for (Which isn't the BS on their website)
The leftist media claiming the loss in Virginia was due to racist white people
Our Law Enforcement officers portrayed as racist Black haters by the left to the point of them leaving their profession

Do I really have to list a few thousand? Are we just pretending the left isn't using race as a weapon?

 

You can say "it is not" as many time as you want.

I see the same thing over and over, Democrat party ("progressives") support and promote all the ills that is happening in United States.
Currently, there is absolutely NOTHING positive coming from Democrat party.

I remember they were advocating at least something in some way beneficial, like Health Care for all.
But now I do not see anything but destruction.

 

Excellent! Not enough people can say that anymore, largely due to the deterioration of our educational system over the past decades from one that teaches facts and basics to one that is more worried about how "woke" they are, and indoctrinating our children to ensure compliance.

However, if you are as familiar with the US Revolution (1.0) as you claim to be, how then, unless you're some sort of modern day King George (or Queen Elizabeth, as it were) loyalist, can you turn around and make a statement like, "Violence doesn't solve anything."? I would advise you to use your words carefully as you ponder my question, for Washington, Jefferson, Adams, et al were the ones oh so many years ago that were proclaimed as insurrectionists, revolutionaries, and traitors to the Crown, who then used violence to create what ultimately became the greatest country that has ever existed on the planet Earth. Their cause may (or may not) have been more just, and their tactics were an order of magnitude better than what happened on 1/6, nonetheless had they lost the Revolution, it would not today be called "The Revolutionary War", if it were called anything at all, and those men who today we rightfully put on a pedestal as heroes, would merely be spoken of as "would be revolutionaries" who, on dates none of us could even remember, were once hung by the neck until they were dead, if indeed they were spoken of at all.

 

Because if you know the source of that quote, as it seems you do, I must be forced to wonder why you use it with such dismissing disrespect? He was right when he said it, and he's right today, even if it's not (yet?) the time for such things within the USA.