I believe we now have conclusive proof that Trump caused 1/6

A simple, "Go home, Biden won," would have saved the life of one cop and the serious injuries to nearly 200 Capitol cops.

 

IOW, you would rather not answer my question.

Focus: "Congressional hearings have nothing to do with "full disclosure" -- surely you know that...." Ddy So, do you know that - or not?

 

There would have been no "January 6th insurrection" if Benedict Donald hadn't called his mob to Washington. <-period

 

If this was an insurrection against the government. That is what the FBI does for a living. At least they know what they are doing most of the time.

 

There also would have been no riot had he never run in the first place...

Him having a rally doesn't equal him causing a riot.

 

But with the ton of evidence of it being planned does.

 

If they at least appeared to be interested in sharing what they know in the interests of national security, their candor would accrue to their repute, but they seem to have decided that their perspective is better suited to ideological entertainment venues than to sworn testimony.

​

 

They are defending the coup attempt openly in public.

 

Whatever you need to label it, Trump's goons injuring 140 police as they trashed the Capitol, seeking to prevent Congress and the Vice President form fulfilling their Constitutional duty in formally acknowledging all the states' certified electoral votes, deserves the cooperation of patriots.

 

Amazing that so many defending Trump pretend it was a pure coincidence they showed up--violently--on that day.

 

You don't think the FBI are patriots?

 

Not even close to sedition .. and hardly an "Insurrection" having no backing from the army and no legitimate chance of challenging the Gov't in any way. Any protest getting out of hand would qualify as "insurrection" under such definition .. to me a bridge too far.

What is even more of a political clown show were the moron's calling this a "Coup" .. calling the protestors "Terrorists"

and yes .. that is your full jug of Kool-Aid going on the folks that ingested this disturbing idiocy.

 

He called the mob to Washington, and told them they were going to have to FIGHT to win back their country. There were Four Hours of speeches that morning, filled with anger, hate and calls to violence and only 2 to 3 seconds of "peaceful patriotism".

 

It fits the definition, you may not like it; but it does.<-period

You realize your defending people that sent 140 police officers to the hospital, one of whom died, people that wiped their **** on the walls of OUR Capitol and would have killed the Vice President, Speaker of the House and any other of our elected officials had they got their hands on them.

WHO'S drinking what?

 

Agree, correct. All Trump supporters have is referring to some tweet of his saying, be peaceful. As if that negates the ton of evidence Trump organized the coup.

 

LOL, and you even snipped off the rest of my post that re-explained exactly what the OP was saying that you apparently missed. Read it again, I guess. Or not, I don't think you care what the truth is.

 

Trump apologists are straining mightily to avoid confronting the documented record - the desperate messages that the Cry Baby Loser ignored as his goons attacked Congress, e.g., “We need an Oval address. He has to lead now. It has gone too far and gotten out of hand. He’s got to condemn this sh!t asap” from Trump, Jr. to which Meadows replied: “I’m pushing it hard. I agree.”

Clearly, no credible defense can be contrived.

 

The FBI can handle it. That is what they are trained for. Hopefully, it would take the politics out of it.

 

I will defend anyone that is unfairly targeted on the basis of a political clown show. Was a protest that got out of hand .. folks injured .. which is normally the case.

Your claiming these people were "Terrorists" however .. is abject nonsense on account of authoriatarian bliss.. Did you wish to turn all protesters - and anyone involved - where some violence erupts in to Terrorists ... or just the one's involved in the Capitol protest.

 

Not sure where you got your false inflammatory info but the only two that died of violence were Trump supporters.

 

This was not your conversation.

I replied to his notion that because he supposedly could have stopped it, that therefore he caused it. There is no such connection between those two separate actions.

I am not sure why you are prattling on about something else and then acting as if I am ignoring the point to which I responded.

 

If you break into the Capitol and assault 200 cops and kill one, yes, you are a terrorist.

 

Someone assaulted 200 cops and killed one of them? Wow. Who?

 

Not one person. Obviously I did not say or imply that.

 

The why did you say "If you break into the Capitol and assault 200 cops and kill one, yes, you are a terrorist."

Your words are clearly referring to an individual.