Russian submarine with 160 nuclear warheads appears off the coast of the United States

To those of us who strive to see the "Big Picture", that has been done.

Help me out here and see if you can find any seismograph data regarding last week's explosion. Also check out the shock waves shown on the satellite photos, compare them to similar pictures taken of the numerous nuclear tests that have been recorded, and get back to me.

Then compare satellite photos of other recent volcano explosions and see if there are similar shock waves.

 

I'm disappointed in your knowledge of current events. Ash Blanketing Tonga after Volcano Eruption Creates Health Concerns - Scientific American

 

I was burrowed in a camp nestled in a Michlen rubber plantation. The multinationals were “harvesting” in Vietnam, too.

 

I have not looked up how many warheads Russia has actually placed on this sub's missiles, but Russia and the US agreed to have no more than ten warheads on their ICBMs and SLBMs.

So any such missile can have up to ten warheads on it.

 

Right. 16 missiles, each carrying 10 self-guided warheads.
Do you know what the word "math" means? This is when 16x10=160.

 

Bravo!!!
The American and Russian peoples have one common enemy - the oligarchs and exploiters on both sides.

 

Thanks for the link. Very interesting. I think it's a natural disaster. Although, admittedly, a volcanic eruption can be easily provoked. But in this case, I tend to believe that it was a natural cataclysm.
Once again, thanks for the link.

 

Yet the K-10 incident happened in 1961....

 

This is not new news. I figure we've had Soviet/Russian boomers patrolling US coasts for as long as the Soviets/Russians have had boomers that work. The real questions are how well are we tracking them and can our fast attack subs take them out in between the time they start prepping to launch, and the time they're actually launch capable. The answer to those questions are likely above top secret and not something the Navy or DOD will be discussing publicly anytime soon. I'm fairly sure we can take them out before they launch, but that's just speculation on my part based on knowing how many generations we are ahead of them in terms of technology.

 

According to various sources, at least one U.S. attack submarine trails every Russian ballistic missile submarine the moment it leaves Russian waters.

Of course modern missiles have so much range that they don't need to leave Russian home waters in order to attack targets in the U.S.

 

It is safe to say that the American missile defense is not able to destroy the new Russian missiles. In hypersound, the United States lagged behind Russian developments by 10-15 years. And this is accept by all military experts, including American ones.
That is why the United States is forced to discuss Russia demands with Russia. And to persuade Russia to reduce some of them.
By the way, the United States gave an interim answer for the Russians and asked not to publish this answer. https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...0aa5e2-7a8b-11ec-b79d-e53ef5e1fbe2_story.html

 

Destroyed by Illusion's threads remind me a lot of those "Secret Aircraft of the Fill-in-the-Blank" documentaries they used to show on the History Channel before it switched to an all-hillbilly crab fishermen lineup. You know what I mean, the sort of program that shows how Germany or Japan could have won WWII if only they'd developed CGI.