Horse Paste Officially Horse Sh*t — Science

Gotta love actual double-blind, peer-reviewed research...

Horse Paste Officially Horse Sh*t — Science ~ Wonkette

Link to New England Journal of Medicine study

WE TOLD YOU.
WE TOLD YOU.
WE TOLD YOU.

 

Wait. Phy. Did you tell us? LOL

 

You'll get my horse paste when you scrape it from my cold, dead hooves. How did you get the idea that I care about science?

 

That "wait for the science" beats "Cuzin Scooter says the drive-thru cashier at Sonic saw on FB that..." any day of the week and twice on Sunday? You betcha...

 

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/wonkette/

 

Which is why a link to the New England Journal of Medicine article was also included.

Source bias gotcha fail, and horse paste remains horse ****.

 

From the New England Journal of Medicine, this is the referenced study.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2115869

 

B-but Doctor Joe Rogan thinks it's great. I mean, surely a man who made his living burying people blindfolded in boxes of live scorpions wouldn't lie, would he?

 

Why would he lie? It was prescribed by his doctor. Right, I'm sure you know more than a millionaires physician...

 

Joe Rogan may have taken it, but he also took monoclonal antibodies, z-pack and a vitamin drip.... just that did not get as much attention

 

Michael Jackson had a physician too

I think looking at what Trump took when he got Covid is key, was it any of the things he recommended?

 

They still fact check as correct, sarcastic, but correct

 

If that Millionaires physician” is prescribing medication that is NOT supported by EBP - Evidence Based Practice then yes, I do know more

 

I begin to think that one can make any claim about Covid cures/preventatives that one wishes and that a body of cases with a proper outcome to support that claim can be found.

 

The trouble is that it takes a discipline known as “critical analysis” to determine what is good research and what is questionable and that is masters level education
Or - you can rely on a country like Australia, which has a UHC and a government allergic to spending more than it absolutely has to, to make the determinations for you.

https://covid19evidence.net.au/

Or the UK guides

https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng191

 

Because they were making money from it. The gullible were tuning in in the millions and that sells advertising

 

First off. Not horse paste. Not sure how many times this has to be mentioned.
Second. Always worth investigation to allow people to have options
Third. Science finally caught up to what we've been saying all along in that this isn't going away and we need to leave it up to the individual.

https://www.tiktok.com/@amputeepatriot1776/video/7086228937113603374?_t=8RTy69VQKTl&_r=1

Took ya two years, and wrecking the global economy for years to come but ya finally found a path to sanity! Thanks for playing.

 

Horse paste? Can you support your assertion that it's horse paste? I doubt it!

 

And anyone who is informed knows this was ALWAYS going to be the outcome. No scientists ever said it would be eliminated.

Your claim is nonsense because you don't even understand the report.

 

I think even you may acknowledge that the rhetoric has drastically shifted to a more sane reality we have been saying this whole time. PERSONAL RESPONSABILITY AND ASSESSMENT OF RISK.

You don't even know what that means. But that's ok. Stay hyper focused on horse paste.

 

Yeah, now that we've applied hundreds of millions of vaccinations. Duh!

 

Aaaaaaannnnd the reason we are now at the “live with it” stage is 1) vaccination and 2) America has successfully managed to reduce the vulnerable population by killing yhem all off

 

Except, of course, for the 27+ other studies that do show it's effective. Particularly in combination with other meds.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248252/

Their pure, slavering obedience to the hive mind is obvious in several ways:

They suggest cost as a motive, when the "vaccine" makers have made billions and Ivermectin costs almost nothing.

They routinely denigrate it as "horse medicine" when the truth is Ivermectin is on the WHO list for essential medications most beneficial to humanity.

These are the same people that drool all over Fauci despite his constant 180s on every topic and the fact that he's been right about almost nothing in his entire career.

I can sum up how wrong the zombies are with this snippet: Information which is easily something they could find if they wanted to. The truth is, they don't want to know.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8383101/

Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines

"In 2015, the Nobel Committee for Physiology or Medicine, in its only award for treatments of infectious diseases since six decades prior, honoured the discovery of ivermectin (IVM), a multifaceted drug deployed against some of the world’s most devastating tropical diseases. Since March 2020, when IVM was first used against a new global scourge, COVID-19, more than 20 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have tracked such inpatient and outpatient treatments. Six of seven meta-analyses of IVM treatment RCTs reporting in 2021 found notable reductions in COVID-19 fatalities, with a mean 31% relative risk of mortality vs. controls. During mass IVM treatments in Peru, excess deaths fell by a mean of 74% over 30 days in its ten states with the most extensive treatments."

 

Have you done a critical analysis on those studies? How many were RCTs? How many were case studies? What was the academic rigour shown in those studies? Were there vested interest biases? Were they peer reviewed? How rigorous was the peer review process?

CRITICAL ANALYSIS YOU HAVE TO APPLY CRITICAL ANALYSIS and that my friend is at least masters level qualifications

 

And by definition, if you need meta analysis then at best the effect is tiny and barely detectable.