The Disturbing trial of Johnny Depp - Cancel Culture - Propaganda

Depp is currently in a defamation trial which has been aired on the major networks. In a Nutshell -- Amber Heard is a Sociopath.. violent - uber controlling - massive psychological abuse .. The girl when you see coming .. Run.

Now .. Depp should have dumped her way before it got to the stage it did .. but that is irrelevant. Whats relevant is this dude was used and abused .. lost part of his finger .. had a cigarette crushed out on his face ..

but he was all fine with that .. no harm .. no foul .. other than he did finally divorce Amber - at a cost of 7 million . +legal fees. What he was not fine with was being tarred as physically abusive ..including sexual abuse - plastered all over the tabloids .. the defamation suit for his kids so that they don't think their dad is a scum bucket.

but none of this matters to cancel culture ... "The woman must be believed" the consequence of which is that the man is to be disbelieved ... guilty as charged .. don't even need a trial.

Law is for criminals .. and criminals are people .. some of which will use what ever means is at their disposal to achieve a certain end - lie, cheat, steal .. what ever they think will benefit them.

For people such as this - cancel culture is just another tool - and will take advantage where they can.

Newsflash .. women are people last time I checked .. some of which will do what ever it takes to succeed .. including lying about sexual abuse.

 

Not sure why you do it, but obviously you are trying to twist it into something that its not.

This is about two celebrities who are repeatedly suing each other in the courts over false accusations / libel, including some op-ed pieces she personally wrote in tabloids. The court should order then to stay the heck away from each other.

There is nothing new in divorced people trashing each other, especially when they are celebrities and millions of dollars are on the table.

 

You are the only one twisting things into things they are not. Your claim that this is not about false accusations .. which is what my post was about .. that somehow I am twisting things by claiming false allegations ... is preposterous nonsense and a massive fit of projection.

So Twisted and warped out of shape is your thinking - . that you refute your own claim one line later claiming this was about false accusations.

Sorry mate -- People often lie .. and women are people .. and in what twisted world this is not the case .. how have you twisted things thus.. and why are you projecting your failings onto me ?

 

Why do you have to lie about what I said? I did not say its NOT about false accusations, I said IT IS about false accusations.

You are trying to make it about "cancel culture", when its really just about two divorced individuals doing everything in their power to smear each other publicly and they are repeatedly dragging each other to the courts, and not only in US, but other countries too.

Keep your anger and ad hominems to yourself.

 

You did say it .. don't blame me you don't know what you are saying half the time. You prance around crying "You are trying to twist things into something they are not" to a post about false accusations by Heard.

I am not twisting anything .. indeed there were false accusations .. you said I was twisting the situation into something it was not .. negating my false accusation claim .. so even though you didn't say it directly .. you said it by negation.

I said there were false accusations in the situation .. you crying "NO NO NO .. you are twisthing things" is you claiming there were not false accusations.

Were you not aware of this .. no wonder you don't understand what you are saying half the time ?

Then you turn around and claim there was false accusations in the next sentence .. directly contraticting your previous nonsense accusation - and accuse me of fallacy .. what a joke.

 

True, but none of this is appropriate for a libel lawsuit. The judge shouldn't have allowed it. The court should hear the facts surrounding the libel or defamation and the facts about the harm received from it. The garbage I heard on watching a little of the trial had nothing to do with the complaints.

 

I saw a headline that there was a letter written by him, which pretty much says that he was at least partially guilty. Sounds like a marriage from hell, and they just can't move forward.

 

Two screwed up people. Fame and fortune don't work well with some people.

 

Sorry but this has nothing to do with cancel culture.

 

"The woman must be believed" is part of cancel culture.

 

I was interested that the mask seems to have come off when he asked for a post nuptial agreement and she found out she wasn't in his will.

 

No its not and has nothing to do with two celebrity's enacting the war of the roses movie in real life.

 

That's what I said, and the OP blew a gasket and tried to walk away from the "cancel culture" claim.

 

Are you unaware that the problem starts when she accuses him of abuse and demand he be cancelled?
Sure you're not.

 

Explain what you think "Cancel Culture" is and why "The woman must be believed" is not part of "Cancel Culture"

 

Irrelevant since it has has nothing to do with two celebrity's enacting the war of the roses movie in real life.

 

I certainly wouldn't hold Johnny Depp up as a pillar of truth and honesty either, they both seem like they deserved each other.

 

What exactly is cancel culture??

 

Their divorce seems to have little to no connection to politics???

 

My only comment is: Why is this news? Who gives a crap? We have probably known people like both of them. They are not worth wasting time..

 

Its you that is irrelevant .. crying "Nothing to do with cancel culture" Then when corrected .. as "The woman must be believed" is part of Cancel culture ..

Then you cry "irrelevant" followed by falsehood - as the case has having everything to do with the false accusations of sexual misconduct.

Handed ? can you say .. backside ?

 

Which has nothing to do with Cancel culture of which "The woman must be believed" is not part of.

 

What part of .. Explain what you mean by "Cancel Culture" and why "The Woman must be Believed" is not part of your definition.... did you not understand the first go around..

Running around crying "NO NO NO" is not an argument for anything. now buck up or shut up.

 

What part of "This has nothing to do with two celebrity's enacting the war of the roses movie in real life" don't you understand?

 

The trial has a whole lot to do with false allegations of sexual misconduct .. you Crying "NO NO NO" over and over l with zero suport for claim .. will not change the fact that you clearly have no idea what this case is about. .. Now go find an argument somewhere ..