Disney announces new 2022 LGBTQ+ clothing collection for kids

Not it feels like Disney is screwing with y’all.

 

Pssssst........I don't know how to tell you this but......

 

Wait........what? How did wearing a clothing article get to a conversation?

 

No!! Not at all.

 

Dude, the left wants the same thing for people who don’t believe in global warming. They want to imprison the deniers.

 

Best post

 

I see you aren’t up on all the news. Here’s a list of some books banned in California. When you come to grips with that then your other false claims can be addressed.

https://www.newsweek.com/kill-mocki...lifornia-schools-over-racism-concerns-1547241

https://ncac.org/news/california-book-challenge-2020

 

Everything. We exist because of straight people. Buttigieg didn’t squeeze out a kid, did he?

 

Dude, the new line of clothing is designed specifically for gays. For a group of people who absolutely hate it when something is not gender neutral, this must really melt your ice cream.

 

Right here on this board for one. If you haven’t seen the stories and videos then you’re probably intentionally tuning them out.

 

Is that a joke? How about all of history until nowv

 

Actually, rainbows signify how a beam of white, all inclusive, light is sent off course and separated by something that differentiates the speed of each color. The rainbow colors actually signify the opposite of inclusiveness. Of course black is just the absence of color altogether and sucks up all the energy that you give.

 

A visual purity best suited to innocent little children rather than deviant adults.

 

Yes, my statement made sense. If saying the new line with rainbows was inclusive, then that in turns means the original line didn't include LGBT, as if they can't wear clothes that do not include gay symbols.

You knew that.

 

So if we are discussing a specific topic, that means we are bothered by it? Isnt the entire purpose of this site for discussion?

 

Oh, good for you. You found ONE (1) school district that has a "temporary" ban on some classics. The reasoning is also not at all like the reasoning for the many right wing schools reasoning for banning. Sure, you can say "banning is banning" and there is something to that but in the case you brought it's because of racial bigotry which btw has caused a lot of "banning" of all types across the nation.
Here.....for your pleasure
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/18/opinion/school-book-bans-students.html

 

No, but that's because he's a male. Many gay men have children. Educate yourself......oh, and your answer didn't answer the question at all. Proof that you don't actually have an argument to make.

 

The is simply your opinion that happens to be completely wrong. The line isn't specifically for gays. The line is to show support for gays....which your answer show the need for.

 

Wait.....so you're knowledge of gays and gender issues comes from this forum. That's so sad.

 

Go on, you know you wanna tell us

 

No, I don't know that and I don't agree with it. It doesn't make sense. One thing doesn't have to mean another thing is true. But you know that.

 

Yes, and in that discussion you contridicted yourself.

 

LMAO, how does one steal a rainbow !!!

 

They are? Where? By whom?

The problem is, and I believe it's 99.9% mental, that people with alternative lifestyles or whom belong to minority groups have constant victimization is because they perceive everybody is discriminating against them. It's a confidence issue, not reality.

Straight people get just as much flak, they just don't immediately assume it's because they are straight.

Which rights are those, and who are these groups calling for that?

First, the basis of discussion can not be from the perspective of viewpoints of the most extreme. That solves nothing. Secondly, asking them to stop shoving their agenda down our throat because it's annoying is not violating their rights.

 

I have no idea, but maybe the unicorns can explain that.