Replacement 'theory'

Close enough, depending on how you measure that. But it really doesn't matter as I literally read all 50, and with the noted exceptions, they all pretty much say the same thing.

 

I thought that it was near purple, if not already there.

 

With all the illegal "residents", many of whom may be voting, you may unfortunately be right.

What we need to do is deregister EVERYONE, very soon after an election (like, say, the upcoming midterms), and make whoever wants to reregister provide proof of citizenship to do so. ACTUAL proof, not some made up random 4-digit number.

 

Most places don’t require it because the Dems pitch a bitch anytime it’s tried. In North Carolina the citizens voted to amend their constitution to require ID to vote. That was four years ago. Since then the democrats have challenged it in court and lost and still refuse to put it as a requirement for voting in NC even though the people voted it as a constitutional amendment to the states constitution.

The democrats still won’t “allow it”.

 

No, you didn't get it. 35 States require is every time you vote.

So, you don't think they match it up with your name and address etc....? LOL

It is fairly easy to track down people to lie, and the punishment is pretty harsh ve the benefits they get from comitting the crime (no benefit whatsoever)

"I understand that giving false information to procure a voter registration is perjury, and a crime under state and federal law. Conviction of this crime may result in imprisonment up to one year in jail, a fine up to $4,000, or both. Please read all three statements to affirm before signing."

 

Isn't NC Republican controlled?

 

Same thing they always do. Squeal racist to try and trick people into not talking about it.

We really need to stop falling for that think of how insane they have become squealing ____ophobe at people to get them not to question or think about the insane idea of transitioning kids.

 

Yes in the legislature but only a slight minority. The problem is the governor is not so he vetoes everything they do. And the Supreme Court is not. Until 2020 it had all but one of its members as liberals. Conservatives made some headway in the last election there but it’s still majority liberal on the NC Supreme Court.

 

I never missed it because there is nothing in his manifesto that makes any claim about it or an actions that support it. Its a CNN theory. What is the killer replacing by mass murdering blacks? If thats true then the KKK is also using replacement theory yet you never heard of that before.
But you feel free to post the part of the manifesto that supports CNN theory.
Just a heads up, CNN hasn't posted it either.

Carlson is discussing using illegals to gain more votes. Using illegal votes to cancel legal conservative votes.

 

Great point! It's been too long since the last time I brushed up on "logical fallacies" academics. But that is definitely one we should keep in mind because so many use it so often.

 

Replacement 'theory'

 

Yeah, it needs to be called out every day and all day long.

 

Yes. It's the WOKE pushing for the Replacement VOTE.

​

 

Require what, exactly? For you to show up at the polls with your birth certificate, passport, or naturalization certificate? Sorry, but I call bullshit.

I do not. First, I don't think the Social Security Administration has the bandwidth to process millions of voter registration applications, and like I said, the last 4 of an SSN is not unique. It is completely possible that you and I have the same "last 4", but even if that turns out to not be true, it IS true that we share it with millions of other people. We have roughly 330,000,000 people in our country, and there are only 10,000 combinations of "last 4", so just do the math.

Not to mention, and perhaps I should have highlighted this a little more, you are not required to have or submit the last 4 of your social, you can simply enter "NONE", and they'll assign you a random number to be used only for the purposes of processing your registration. It may be unusual, but there are US Citizens out there who for one reason or another don't have an SSN, as it's only required if you need it for income tax purposes, and we were promised it would never be used as a form of ID in the first place. I also wouldn't be surprised (but don't know one way or the other) if it's possible to file income taxes without one. But some people don't have an income. Trust fund kids, women who have always been nothing but a housewife (that does exist, my mother never had a job until my folks got divorced), you name it.

Please. Find me, I beg you, even a small handful of people being convicted of that crime and punished by the max. There exists no probable cause to even suspect anyone because they're not required to submit enough documentation to prove or disprove citizenship, especially when "NONE" is an acceptable answer. Face it, it's easy for an illegal to get a registration, despite the fact that you don't want to admit it. And there is a huge benefit, when they do so in large numbers, which I think is highly likely. In places like CA where I can already call their vote for the 2024 Presidential election without even knowing who is running, it doesn't make a bit of difference for the Presidential votes. They could have more votes than they have registered voters (which I understand has happened in a lot of places), and all 55 of CA's electoral votes are going to the Dem. Hell, they'd vote Dem if there wasn't a Dem running.

But they could make a difference in down ballot races, House, Senate, and local races. And in States that aren't possible to call years before the election, like say, Florida, they could be the difference between the R and the D. I mean, why do you think Biden is sending some of those secret midnight flights full of illegals here in the first place? One of whom went out and killed someone within just a couple of weeks.

 

Do you know everything that is in the Manifesto?

 

As in, a question was posed to them in a regular election?

I don't understand. How can the voters be taken to court?

 

That’s correct. The NC voters voted in an election to amend the NC constitution to require voter id to vote.

“The North Carolina Voter ID Amendment was on the ballot in North Carolina as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 6, 2018. The ballot measure was approved. On February 22, 2019, a judge ruled that the amendment was invalid in NAACP and Clean Air Carolina v. Moore and Berger. Upon appeal, a preliminary ruling overturned the injunction against the enforcement of the voter ID requirement. It also allowed the court ruling to go forward.”

 

I know whats been provided.
And NOBODY has provided ANYTHING about replacement conspiracy theory
But hey, you could be the first.
Show me what you have

 

Once again, the hounds are off and running, baying as they follow the scent of a dead fox dragged on the ground.

Meanwhile, this poor old country mouse is content to follow the trends in the population make-up of the United States of America as reported by reputable sources.

Regards, stay safe 'n well . . . 'n remember the Big 5.

 

Opinion | How the Buffalo Massacre Proves There’s No 'Great Replacement'

Buffalo is among the most segregated Black communities in America — a legacy of the peculiar, Black-subordinating institution once called the ghetto, until that noun became a pejorative. According to The New York Times, the terrorist shooter selected the Tops Friendly Market as the best spot for a killing spree after researching predominantly Black ZIP codes. The legacy of segregation eased his selection process. In a historically redlined community still suffering from disinvestment, this sole supermarket on the Black side of town had become a treasured community gathering space in what had previously been a food desert.

In his manifesto, the terrorist shooter implied that the mere presence of Black people were a threat to his future and that of other whites. And he fabulized that each Black “replacer” on average cost white taxpayers $700,000 in government largesse.

But the history of segregated Buffalo shows that instead of Blacks replacing whites and taking up too many resources, the truth is the opposite — that many descendants have been cordoned off from the rest of society and systematically denied access to resources and opportunities that whites enjoy.
https://www.politico.com/news/magaz...ssacre-great-replacement-segregation-00034177

Almost 400 years after the advent of slavery, innocent blacks are still being shot down in public.

 

So the point is that Carlson spews language that could incite a shooting.
And yet even though Carlson has one of the largest audiences in the country shootings are exceedingly rare.
And the shooter didn't watch him.

Do you ever think before you post?

 

Except there IS a difference, a rather large one. On one side you have Carlson speaking out about illegal voting and the other side is a concern over the disappearance of the white race. Only a gdamn fool would argue those POV are the same.

 

Assuming that you immediately discount liberal news sources such as CNN, would you accept Fox News?

 

WHAT reputable sources?

 

Nah, there isn't, it still a distinction with a difference, the foolishness is local. Logical fallacies are disingenuous.