10 key quotes from Justice Alito's opinion overturning Roe v. Wade

To insure you are not fertile and will not become pregnant, yes you can get them over the counter.

Now do you have anything to add to the discussion of the legal merits here or not?

 

It’s not 100% and can cause abortion.

 

Lol and if you get pregnant you can use it like plan B. Why are you dodging that fact??

 

Not even remotely true.

 

Ok, I see your lips moving, but no rational sound coming out of your mouth. Nothing to back up your empty words?

 

Your post gets things backwards mate .. is those that favor RvW who can't live under a nation of "valid" Law .. hate the priciples of our constitutional republic .. and founding principles. This RINO clownshow should be barred from the party.

The above demonstrates exactly why it should not be a States right to trample on essential liberty in the case of abortion.

 

“Valid law”? As if you decide. Do you want 300 million different “valid laws”, a different one for each person? What are you going to do after the party ends and everyone goes home? You won’t know what the law is. Now you do. You either accept our civilization, or you take up arms and go to war against it.
And now it is a state’s right. Why? Because numerous democrat and republican congresses kicked the can down the road avoiding the question: “Is abortion in the constitution?” It isn’t. If you find it, show me. (after your phone call to SCOTUS telling them what you discovered).
So you can expect state legislatures to do their jobs and represent their pro abortion constituents. That is how it works around here.
Take the loss like a chest feeder.

 

I'm not, why can't you discuss the topic here?

 

Now do you have anything to add to the discussion of the legal merits here or not?

 

I am.

 

Then I await your comments on Alito's points of law.

 

He’s wrong on contraception because some forms of it can cause abortion….depending when one thinks life begins

 

I'm not the one that needs to learn about basic biology.

 

The Dobbs Decision Unleashes Rage And Revisionism

​

"Notably, it is precisely what the Court anticipated in condemning those who would make arguments "designed to stoke unfounded fear"...

Even when they and their families were threatened by the Left with death, the majority stood firm.

"Vice President Kamala Harris and others repeated the claims that same-sex marriage, contraceptives, and other rights are now in danger. The Court, however, expressly and repeatedly stated that this decision could not be used to undermine those rights: “Abortion is fundamentally different, as both Roe and Casey acknowledged, because it destroys what those decisions called ‘fetal life’ and what the law now before us describes as an ‘unborn human being.'” The Court noted:"

"“Perhaps this is designed to stoke unfounded fear that our decision will imperil those other rights, but the dissents' analogy is objectionable for a more important reason: what it reveals about the dissent’s views on the protection of what Roe called “potential life.” The exercise of the rights at issue in Griswold, Eisenstadt, Lawrence, and Obergefell does not destroy a “potential life,” but an abortion has that effect. So if the rights at issue in those cases are fundamentally the same as the right recognized in Roe and Casey, the implication is clear: The Constitution does not permit the States to regard the destruction of a “potential life” as a matter of any significance.”

This didn't stop CNN, legal analyst and noted idiot "Jennifer Rodgers echoed the common claim that this decision could now be used to unravel an array of other rights and “criminalizing every single aspect” of women’s reproductive healthcare. Rodgers suggested that states could ban menstrual cycle tracking: “Are they going to be able to search your apps—you know there’s apps that track your menstrual cycle. You know how far are these states going to try and go?”

If there is this broad consensus on a national right to abortion, how come such legislation has NEVER in the history our nation, passed our representative National Legislature?

And if this is our most pressing national issue, why are Pelosi and the Clowns using the House for J6 Trump revenge porn rather that passing this supposed nationally desired standard?

 

He said nothing on the efficacy of contraception which is not the topic of this thread go start one.

Then I await your comments on Alito's points of law.

 

Let's put it this way -



The fact that someone made that dress to begin with ...

 

word salad tripe the highbrow rightwing goes threw to eliminate womens rights while their lowbrow pastors encourage rebellion in the land, transparent and incredible

 

I didn’t say anything about the efficacy of it either.

 

No I don't put it that way. My post was just for comedy not politics. I was trying to inject levity into a polarized subject.

There are just as many anti abortion nut cases.

 

Life produces life, and life has been doing so continuously for billions of years. Every life on earth today has been potential since the first dna. Every child born was potential when its mother was born with all her eggs, and her mother before, and her mother before...
The argument about when life begins is ridiculous. In society, decisions about death happen all the time. What women decide is unique. Everyone born dies. Giving birth is giving death. No one else, no group or majority, has such a responsibility. It is nonsensical for anyone else to impose his decision on a woman. What is the danger in having those women who are directly concerned make their decisions?

 

You have created the internet sin of attempting to understand the subject! Shame on you! (And thanks!)

There should be an exception for men who would like the child to be born.

 

As a woman, I've had the protection of those laws, specifically the 4th Amendment and Section 1 of the 14th, since Roe v Wade was passed. But this activist, ultra conservative SCOTUS has taken it upon themselves to strip those rights from women. What laws do you expect us to obey when we are not allowed privacy in our own persons and personal affairs?

States rights should never override our fundamental rights under the Constitution. This was an unconstitutional ruling.

 

Except the body of government chartered with interpreting what the Constitution says has declared that the document contains no established right to abortion. That right is determined by the citizens in their respective State to decide. That's a victory for Democracy!

 

If it is the man who is pregnant, surely.

 

Science is not ridiculous.