Let the evidence speak: DID VACCINES SAVE US?

Open Public Hearing Session

https://rumble.com/embed/v15yv60/?pub=4 3:19min

 

What parts are fact? Can you identify them at least?

 

Sure they had a meeting to discuss a pandemic. That happens all the time. Go back through the past 20 years and see how many meetings people had to discuss the possibility of pandemics.

Schools have active shooter drills all the time, is that because they are planning to conduct a mass shooting?

Lord forbid that people prepare for something that might actually happen.

 

No, that's how cognitive dissonance works--a refusal to examine facts and evidence that contradict one's worldview.

 

I know what cognitive dissonance is. I took some sociology courses in my day.

Yeah, well, currently, fascists like to call thought and speech different than their own 'Russian disinformation', for example, because it underscores the desire for fascists to be cognitively dissonant while at the same time implying the 'evilness' of Putin.

 

Thank you.
I bet that phrase doesn't get passed around here that much?

 

Yet another states the same, but with more clarity and info

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1538981028232052737

 

Yessir, not just schools have active shooter drills all the time. Such drills are quite fashionable amongst law enforcement, sadly because they offer perfect cover for telling Bright & Shining Lies to the fearful and gullible public.

 

How do you feel about tornado and fire drills?

 

They make me feel all warm and fuzzy. How about you?

 

I just figured it was some type of conspiracy by big weather and the government to keep is living in fear.

 

Should only take 4 months for your decreased sperm count to recover.

 

I don't know about that. Not what I've been reading.

 

Actually, the few left just get really, really, big!

 

Instead of swimmers for sperm, you get beached whales.

 

~ If they are still alive and healthy !
There's a reason that a group of scientists and medical researchers sued the FDA under FOIA to force release of the documents related to licensing of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine. This should never have been necessary.

 

Exactly. If Pfizer and everyone else involved were transparent, this would have been much cleaner, however, that would have undermined the agenda. But, as only a minority know full well, the COVID theatrics was just a ruse to lure people into getting more than just a dirty needle stuck in their arms.

 

~ Here's some examples of the vaccine failure going back one year. Maybe they forgot to wear a mask ... ? '

​

 

I think this was the study. Although the abstract doesnt detail how long to return to normal sperm count.
Covid-19 vaccination BNT162b2 temporarily impairs semen concentration and total motile count among semen donors - PubMed (nih.gov)

 

I personally think that the vaccines will soon be proven to be one of the most dishonest money making schemes that has ever been pulled off.....


http://www.politicalforum.com/index...arty-leadership.600127/page-2#post-1073523186

 

~ Unfortunately this appears to be the case ...

 

and that's just the start of it. It will also be made apparent that the injections were designed to be genocidal.

 

IMO all that is already apparent. The facts and evidence gathered and analyzed by David Martin, Steve Kirsch and so many others show these to be bio-weapons. The IFR for the phantom virus is about 1%. Why is such a crazy experimental drug necessary for that? It's not.

 

COVID-19 ‘Vaccines’ Are Gene Therapy

Not a vaccine in the medical definition, the COVID-19 ‘vaccine’ is really an experimental gene therapy that does not render immunity or prevent infection or transmission of the disease.


STORY AT-A-GLANCE

• mRNA “vaccines” created by Moderna and Pfizer are gene therapies. They fulfill all the definitions of gene therapy and none of the definitions for a vaccine. This matters because you cannot mandate a gene therapy against COVID-19 any more than you can force entire populations to undergo gene therapy for a cancer they do not have and may never be at risk for
• mRNA contain genetic instructions for making various proteins. mRNA “vaccines” deliver a synthetic version of mRNA into your cells that carry the instruction to produce the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, the antigen, that then activates your immune system to produce antibodies
• The only one benefiting from an mRNA “vaccine” is the vaccinated individual, since all they are designed to do is lessen clinical symptoms associated with the S-1 spike protein. Since you’re the only one who will reap a benefit, it makes no sense to demand you accept the risks of the therapy “for the greater good” of your community
• Since mRNA “vaccines” do not meet the medical and/or legal definition of a vaccine — at least not until the CDC redefined “vaccine” — marketing them as such is a deceptive practice that violates the law that governs advertising of medical practices
• SARS-CoV-2 has not even been proven to be the cause of COVID-19. So, a gene therapy that instructs your body to produce a SARS-CoV-2 antigen — the viral spike protein — cannot be said to be preventive against COVID-19, as the two have not been shown to be causally linked

mRNA ‘Vaccines’ Fulfill None of the Criteria for a Vaccine

To start, let’s take a look at some basic definitions of words. When these gene therapies were introduced, the definition of vaccine according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, was:[1]

• “A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease.”

Immunity, in turn, was defined as:

• “Protection from an infectious disease,” meaning that “If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected.”

That’s the CDC’s medical definition, which was effective until September 1, 2021 — a detail I’ll go into in the next section. The legal definition, in the few cases where it has been detailed, is equally unequivocal:

• Iowa code[2] — “Vaccine means a specially prepared antigen administered to a person for the purpose of providing immunity.”
• Washington state code[3][4] — “Vaccine means a preparation of a killed or attenuated living microorganism, or fraction thereof …” The statute also specifies that a vaccine “upon immunization stimulates immunity that protects us against disease …”

These definitions, both medical and legal, present problems for mRNA “vaccines,” since:

• mRNA injections do not impart immunity. Moderna and Pfizer both admit that their clinical trials aren’t even looking at immunity. As such they did not fulfill the CDC’s medical and/or legal definition of a vaccine.
• They do not inhibit the transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 infection. As such they do not fulfill the medical and/or legal definition of a vaccine — that is, until the CDC changed its definition of vaccine.

Dictionaries and the CDC Attempt to Rewrite Medical Terms

We should not be fooled by attempts to condition the public to accept redefined terms. As of February 2019, Merriam-Webster defined[5] “vaccine” as “a preparation of killed microorganisms, living attenuated organisms, or living fully virulent organisms that is administered to produce or artificially increase immunity to a particular disease.” By February 26, 2021, they had updated the definition of “vaccine” to:[6]


“A preparation that is administered (as by injection) to stimulate the body’s immune response against a specific infectious disease:


a: an antigenic preparation of a typically inactivated or attenuated … pathogenic agent (such as a bacterium or virus) or one of its components or products (such as a protein or toxin)


b: a preparation of genetic material (such as a strand of synthesized messenger RNA) that is used by the cells of the body to produce an antigenic substance (such as a fragment of virus spike protein)”


Let’s be clear. Merriam-Webster does not dictate medical terminology. It can be used, however, to confuse people. For now, all medical dictionaries still show the traditional definition of vaccine,[7] as Merriam-Webster did up until this year. That said, I would not be surprised if changes are made there as well, eventually, if the misrepresentation of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines is allowed to stand.

Source & more...

 

LOL! Total crackpottery. This should be in the conspiracy forum!!! It is nonsense