AMERICAN MOON (2017): A fascinating documentary about the Moan Hoax from start to finish

All of a sudden the troll believes a newspaper. I gave you an extensive video that relies on full witness accounts and details it all completely! You didn't watch it like a coward.

Troll noise. The idea that this clown suddenly believes garbage reporting instead of in depth analysis from more rigid investigation! Pathetic.



Tell me troll, can you read? Who does it say gave it to him?

Maansteen (onebigmonkey.com)
The exhibition book also makes this very specific claim:
“Drees received a piece of moon rock from the American Ambassador”

Middendorf was contacted for his response to the story, and he said this:
“I do remember that Drees was very interested in the little piece of stone. But that it's not real, I don't know anything about that.”

The irony. Drees an ex-prime minister of the tiny Netherlands said he was interested in a piece of stone he saw. There is no way in hell he would have been given a priceless Moon rock, or shown it outside of pristine curating facilities. GET A CLUE!

 

So Bill Middendorf was the fourth astro'NOT who landed on the Moon in your NASA fairy tale story from 1969 to give the Dutch prime minister the FAKED moon rock...

Seriously, you moon landing shills have to be getting paid from NASA to keep pushing their lunatic fantasies or you are completely bonkers and can't distinguish science fiction from reality...

 

"It was given to former Prime Minister Willem Drees during a goodwill tour by the three Apollo-11 astronauts shortly after their moon mission in 1969."

So who were these three other Apollo-11 astroNOTS that gave the Dutch prime minister the FAKED Antarctica moon rocks that Wernher Von Braun collected in 1966-67, shortly after the FAKED moon mission in 1969?

 

There was no faked moon landing and you made the claim along with the other debunked lies.

It is not on me to fix the lies you posted.

I simply point out you posted bald faced lies because you have been proven wrong and you know it.

 

No, you useless troll, he was the US Ambassador to the Netherlands! He gave him a rock he had previously admired from the State Department that was zero to do with the Apollo samples. Only a clueless troll would think NASA would part with a priceless sample before it had been examined. ALL rocks in the inventory are catalogued and described , the piece of petrified wood isn't included.

And there we have it. The troll has no intelligent response so resorts to troll-noise. No response to the veracity of the 842lbs of lunar samples examined by the entire planet's geologists, no response to how it is IMPOSSIBLE for them to be meteorites, no response to informed observations about how the petrified wood came into Drees possession. You are a complete failure and know it.

Sorry, does English language confuse you? An ex prime minister of a small country supposedly gets a moon rock, whilst the Queen gets a tiny fragment. Get a clue will you. It was given to him as confirmed, by Middendorf. It was already something Drees had noticed. Drees would not have been shown the Apollo sample inventory.

Everything about this, you are a complete failure with. Not least having the balls or integrity to admit your consistent screw ups.

You pathetic troll. You were shown why it is impossible to fake Apollo samples with meteorites, you were told why it was moronic for a rocket engineer to be given the impossible task in the first place, you were told why they would need 100s of tons of rocks considering the rarity of lunar meteorites.

Yet here you are, once again acting like a jackass.

 

The three astro'NOTS who faked going to the Moon gave the Dutch prime minster a FAKE moon rock because the NAZI fu%$ed up when he was in Antarctica and freezing his balls off collecting them. He grabbed whatever he could so he could get the hell out of there ASAP.

But it never dawned on the three NASA idiots that carbon dating was just around the corner to expose their stupidity.

And furthermore the BBC would never lie about something like this and ruin their outstanding credibility, so get over it fellas.

People with working brains know that the moon landing is fake just like the theory of evolution is fake. There is a lot of fake science out there and the EXPERTS have proven the NASA Moon landings are complete frauds.

For example the earth looks so small when viewed from the NASA faked moon pictures. The earth is four times the diameter of the moon. Just imagine what a "Full Earth" would look like if those FRAUDS had actually been on the lunar surface!

Exposing the lies and liars is what I do best. Especially from those people who cannot think with an open mind and just copy, paste and parrot the NASA moon landing lies. I have been following this topic (Moon hoax) for many years and have decimated many of the TOOLS who are incapable of simple common sense, logic and reasoning.

I have to admit that it's really laughable to think that we’re still being told to believe that men went to the moon, landed on it, got out, took pictures, called the president, played golf, got back in the LEM, reconnected to the ship orbiting the moon, flew back to earth and called it a day.

In 1969 btw. It’s ridiculous.

If it looks like a HOAX... and waddles like a HOAX... and quacks like a HOAX... then it's a HOAX!

 

Troll noise. He fails to debate with any honesty or integrity. Now this failure wants to introduce more idiotic claims such as the size of the Earth in pictures. Unfortunately to this very clueless person it's actually possible to prove beyond any doubt that the Earth bears a very close proximity to what it should be, simply by using the images taken on the Moon! The Earth has an angular diameter of 4 x the Moon which is 0.5 degrees. This makes it 2 degrees. We simply need to examine any image with the Earth in and see whether it occupies 2 degrees. Off you go clown, prove your case - fat chance.

The Apollo images have a FOV of around 50 degrees. The Earth is 2 degrees. Now various cropping is done of images, but here is an image showing that the Earth is perfectly in ratio:


For the really hard of understanding, with cropping it's just under 50 degrees, so we would expect just under 25 Earths and allowing for any distortion:

 

It posts like troll, runs away like a troll, knows nothing like a troll, makes noise like a troll, quacks, waddles, annoys like a troll, does everything a troll does and more. It's a troll.

 

You’re such a pathetic liar trying sell such utter nonsense. If I had the email address to your NASA handlers I would tell them they need to shit can your ass as you are failing at every level here and that they are wasting taxpayers money with your failures here at PF.

Now with that being said we know that the distance from the Earth to the Moon is exactly the same as the distance from the Moon to the Earth.
(what a coincidence, I know)

So it's fairly easy to figure out how big the earth would look from the Moon.

All you have to know is how big the moon looks from earth and how much bigger than the moon the earth is.

The first piece of information can be obtained by going outside any time the moon is visible, the answer to the second is that the earth is approximately 4 times bigger than the moon.

So if you were on the moon you would see the earth about 4 times larger than how earthlings see the moon not they way that NASA faked it on their studio created moon set for their man on the moon HOAX.

 

You are gthe only one lying here.

The Earth looked exactly as it should have when they landed there.

Your every effort has failed and you have been proven wrong

 

You are making too much sense here, NC. Standby for Beta to go into his usual rant about the characteristics of the Zeiss Biogon ƒ/5.6 / 60 mm wide-angle lens and how that explains it.

 

He just gets angry when confronted with reality (like the soup can NAZI) and then spouts off proven lies as he regurgitates nothing but absolute spin via laughable word salad nonsense.

It's rather sad that the best he can do is recycle the NASA "CYA" (cover your ass) lunacy that defies all logic and physics.

If he wants to obfuscate reality with NASA science fiction, then I will be here to set him straight with logic and truth. The simple FACT that no other country ever went full insane with putting a man on the moon and it's 50 plus years later with technology exceeding Moore's law, tells you that it wasn't done in 1969-72; and it still can't be done today.

 

He is making crap up as he goes and has long since been crushed

 

Wrong.

you have demonstrated no reality to get angry about.

It was done and the fact is no one has returned because there is no reason to. Advanced techinlogy or not.

Massive failure of logic for you

As usual

 

Troll noise. You have to be one of the most ignorant trolls I have ever come across. My grand kids know more than you. Are you really that dumb that you don't understand what four times larger means? Even when you are given the means to disprove your own useless claim you double down and show how ignorant you are. I even gave you the proof in a simple image and like a troll you ignored it! The FOV of the lens accounts for just under 50 degrees of angular width and the Earth of 2 degrees fits into it just under 25 times. How can anyone be that dumb not to understand this?

The Moon angular diameter is 0.5 degrees(not accounting for variances caused by its elliptical orbit).
Positions and Sizes of Cosmic Objects | Las Cumbres Observatory (lco.global)
The angle covered by the diameter of the full moon is about 31 arcmin or 1/2°

The Earth is 2.0 degrees
What is the angular diameter of Earth as seen from the Moon? - Astronomy Stack Exchange
The angular diameter of the Earth from the surface of the Moon is, therefore, between a=1.80226° (at apogee and the Earth is near the horizon) and a=2.02452° (at perigee and for an observer at the equator and when the Earth is at maximum altitude on the meridian).
Or about 2 degrees.

 

Oh look, the cheer-leading support troll has chimed in.

Being a clown is not impressive. The characteristics of the lens are not relevant and I already explained it with the size of the lens. Or are you going to do your usual denial of in your face rebuttal. I just don't understand what motivates people like you. You failed on every post you directed at me, and here you are, years later failing again. Must give you a warm fuzzy feeling huh?

 

Troll noise. You are diverting with more ignorant crap. The 842lbs of lunar samples. They have been analysed by virtually every geologist of note all over the planet and verified as coming from the Moon. Your pathetic evasion and repeat of things laboriously explained to you is what hoaxnuts routinely do.

 

Since you are the expert - QUESTION: How was this picture taken?

 

His only expertise is being a PUPPET and a liar. He just doesn't even grasp how insane and futile his word salads are.

For instance:

He's clueless about focal length and field of view for imaging lenses, They do not change the magnification and size of the image being photographed via the presented field perspective. And the field view doesn't change with depth of field.

Field of view defines the maximum area of a sample that a camera can image only, so the psychobabble hogwash he posted above is nothing but a pack of lies, and very poor ones too.

The photograph NASA presented of the Earth being taken from the Moon is not only a lie, but demonstrates that they are proven FRAUDS and con artists who $scammed the gullible public who are willing to believe in the Hollywood Sc-Fi nonsense like Star Trek, Space 1999, and Deep Space Nine...LMAO

 

The supposed New Jersey patriot has finally taken to claiming that the moon landings were faked.

Way to show your true colors.

 

Get over it.

It's not my fault that we have highly evolved brains and common sense in my neck of the woods, as opposed to those who were born in South Dakota playing dress-up by wearing a Hoplite helmet, carrying a thrusting spear, and eating themselves to death.

 

You're so highly evolved that you're not even allowed to pump your own gas

 

^^^
So evolved that he calls farting every five minutes "pumping" his own gas.

 

^^^
Posts this after trying to insult other posters' intelligence.

 

Did you know that you could single handily take up the slack in the gas shortages in Europe caused by that very bad man, Putin.