If that's a serious question, I'm pretty sure that this refers to what are commonly known as "crisis pregnancy centers" (the places that liberals have been vandalizing and burning lately).
They didn't catch him on their own. He called 911 saying he was having suicidal thoughts. That's how the police knew.
I'm not doing much pearl clutching here. If you're armed and show up at an FBI office (or a bank or the grocery store or your neighbor's house...) while ranting and raving then the cops damned well should chase you down and figure out what your intentions are. Under the circumstances, what this guy did was batshit crazy and it's going to be pushed as "right wing extremism". That isn't pearl clutching. It's common sense. The other thing that's common sense is that our federal government has a hard on for "Domestic Violent Extremists" and this guy's actions are going to be used to portray everyone that hasn't stepped on and loudly denounced Trump as being in some way incentivizing this guy and complicit in his actions.
Isn't that what they were doing? Let's look at this logically here. If the FBI received information, verified that information, that he has those documents with classified material in them, and didn't tell the FBI he had them, the FBI should execute the search warrant, should it not be under the law. If Trump was a regular GS 14 employee who had these documents and kept them for himself, wouldn't the FBI do the same thing? What ya'll are really arguing is not about the FBI, it is about Trump. That Trump is immune from the laws no matter what? Or you are hoping, believing that a smoking gun, a substantial smoking gun, will exist. It will not.
No they're not. Some nut bag decided he didn't like some action that the officials took and it's the same thing here
Do you just throw up some word salad when you make a post and think it actually has any point? The point is you're making excuses for the same thing you criticize when the shoe is on the other foot
Non sequitur straw man reach and another fail. You want to make the commentary, you quoted me remember, about me versus what I posted accurately on. Do better.
I'm just having fun sitting here watching you make excuses for your blatant double standards. I could eat a can of alphabet soup and vomit more cogent post.
When the Kavanaugh incident came out, the suspect was a product of liberalism and represented the violent democrats. This guy is just some random nut job. Funny how descriptions of suspects change based on political affiliation.
Completely foreseeable, preventable, and blamable.... Nice job, MAGAworld.... You make every day such a blessing!
Once again, you've reduced your desperate straw man deflection commentary to cheap sandbox mentality personal attacks, that the height of ignorance. You really need to up the game you think you're playing.
So the suspect represents all Republicans like the Kavanaugh suspect represents all democrats, right? Cant wait to hear the sob stories about how he wanted to be an astronaut and was on his way to help the local soup kitchen before the deep state framed him.
If you're going to attempt some semblance of a debate with someone else why don't you allow them to tell you what they think? But since you're so interested in creating my arguments for me why don't you just argue with yourself instead?
I asked a question, and you have not responded. Not my fault you feel your free speech is being infringed on.
Righties tend to see the faults of the left while the same from their side goes unnoticed. Lefties are no different.