Ginni Thomas agrees to January 6 Committee Interview

Now, this Lady is the Wife and pillow talk confidante of a Supreme Court Justice, a right wing conservative, who had his little moment of glory on Wade v Roe.

This very Lady made some outrageous comments to Mark Meadows, including that conspirators in the alleged fraudulent election were, at the relevant time, in custody at Gitmo.

Blatant lying crap was her mantra, and she was doing her level, devious demonic best to upset the 2020 election outcome with absolute horseshit.

And every night, there she is whispering sweet nothings into the ear of one of the most powerful figures in contemporary USA.

Nah....just.........nah!

What I would give to have the chance to cross-examine her about her activities including nocturnal!

 

Here is another commentary detailing some of her drivel.

 

An impeached thomas and an incarcerated trump are the things dreams are made of. That Republicans can dismiss this so easily show just how far gone the party is

 

Glenn usually has insightful and spot-on legal analysis...

 

Maybe you can jail her for holding views that the Left disagrees with and so stating.

What's with this "Free People" crap anyway?

Maybe some Leftist can claim her words were violence and then run her over with a pick up truck.



6 weeks!
VOTE
And then we continue the process that started with dumping Liz Cheney, of restoring the RULE OF LAW to AMERICA!

And as for you, if China is a threat to you, and you need the protection of US forces, the balance of our fiercest fighters come out of our Red States, the ones the Leftists mock as Jesus Land.

You see, we always viewed the Auzzies as our friends and fellow travelers, it's been a bit of shock to learn that many of you hate and despise us simply for holding our Free Views that disagree with yours, because you see, we thought FRIENDS HAD A RIGHT TO DISAGREE WITH ONE ANOTHER.

Why should we fight and die for those that hate and despise us?

Reminds me of when Muhammad Ali refused to fight in Vietnam because no Vietnamese had ever called him "n-----".

You're free to hate us for holding views you disagree with, but, you might also want to start brushing up on your Mandarin.

 

Deposing a Supreme Court justice’s spouse. That should be a fun precedent to play with in the future.

 

Be honest for half a second, if the situation was reversed, and you had a very very left wing judge on the SCOTUS, and it later came out that their spouse was working to overturn a federal election for president…

You wouldn’t want demand that that be investigated? Because I would. The politicization of the court has already taken it from being one of the most highly regarded institutions in our nation to now bringing to the level of Congress. I know that you people hate government, but the games that are be being played here will reverberate for generations. And hopefully it moves the party away from the duopoly or at minimum destroys what is today’s republican party and replaces it with something a little less rotting.

If she has found to have done half the things that she is accused of, I hope she is tried and arrested — and if Clarence Thomas is found to be implicated, I hope he is removed and convicted of sedition. I would feel the same no matter the political affiliation.

I’m not saying you are, but I’ve always questioned how anyone could be so hyper partisan that they would sell out their entire country, their morals, their values, and everything they assert that they stand for simply because there is a R or a D after their name. It’s fascinating. I guess it shouldn’t be that surprising seeing what many people are defending nowadays.

 

That’s funny I wonder the same thing about people who have no problem with weaponizing the FBI over some fantastical notion that there was a coordinated effort to overthrow the federal government with a grand total of less than 3000 people.

Putting up “investigations” on national television where sitting member of Congress definitively state someone is guilty before they’ve finished their investigation and then don’t bring charges. A made for primetime television special where they shortened testimonies, edited testimonies, only allowed evidence that made their case to be presented and refused to present ANY evidence they had which was exculpatory even though they had it.

Please don’t wonder any longer. Just go look at a mirror.

 

Whoa - they got Ginni to testify. Trump should be indicted for realzy any day now lol

 

Triggered?

 

LOL this Jan 6th committee has become a laughingstock at this point. It's been shown for the sham it is and even some of the members lost their primary lol.

 

Breaking news - Bozo the Clown has just agreed to an interview with the committee

They really got Trump now...

 

yeah that's the goal they act like they give a **** about democracy but Eric swalwell was having sex with a Chinese spy and he's still walking around in the Capitol building. Biting molested his daughter and we've actually seen video of him creeping on little girls.

When all of that is forgivable by people doing moralizing they are being dishonest.

Don't trust these people nobody should ever trust these people

well this is really kind of a good thing when they resort to this kind of tactic. It means they've lost the debate. And they must resort to appealing to emotion in response this is a good thing. It means they have been defeated and they're trying to save face.

this is believe it or not another good sign or at least I'm going to point out the silver lining.

Politicians and the people that operate in that circle are always the last to understand culture. So is she realizes big tech is all about censoring people's opinions and controlling what information people see most other people already realize it. And it will be very easy to show reasonable people.

The far leftists who are committed to the cause, they are lost.

But they are the fringe.

These leftists that vote for people like Biden and support this crap one Chinese rule they want to live like the Chinese they say it openly. They claim to be socialists there's no help for these people forget about them they don't matter. The really sort of a good thing because they are taken out of the Democrats side it's just division between the enemy so that's fantastic.

The most important thing to do is put pressure on the Democrats so that they don't continue to try and appeal to these people or if they do they lose popularity within their own party.

Is Democrats are not socialist I think Democrats generally want some social safety nets which we've had for decades they want a little more government interference but beyond that they're not socialist at all. And the more the Democratic politicians move that way the larger the separation between Democrat voters and Democratic politicians will be.

So please see the silver lining it's quite bright and stunning.

 

None of that has anything to do with what I posted. How about addressing what I said about the pillow whisperer, and not what I did not say about Americans at large, ey?

 

Cry me, or better stated, whine me a river! Supreme Court Justice will not be impeached and if he is, Democrats won't hold congress or the White House for decades.

Could care less about Trump. You can have him. Liberals seem more focused on him than the majority of conservatives.

 

Although she has agreed, I think she will "change her mind," make up some lame excuse, and not show up, similar to what Sidney Powell did to the Georgia investigation.

 

I don't see this as a Supreme Court impeachment whatsoever, not unless Clarence Thomas is proven through texts and emails that he also contributed to the fake electors.

 

The FBI has not been weaponized at all. You are just upset that the FBI is going after one of your own instead of only Democrats.

Putting up investigations on national TV has been the halmark of the GOP congress during the Clinton years and Obama years. Do you really want to do the do as I say and not as I do argument all over again X?

 

I noticed you didn’t answer the question. That tells anyone with a semblance of integrity all they need to know. This only reinforces everything I believe.

Cheers

 

Thanks for your thought provoking response.

You should look at the support ratings for Thomas, sure it might piss off the christian nationalists but everyone else will be perfectly fine with it.

 

You’ll have to excuse me for ignoring your loaded and dishonest question. Why is it dishonest? Well I’ll ignore the loaded terminology you used for a moment. But you and I BOTH know what this is about. This is about going after Thomas. You even admitted as much earlier when you spoke about an impeached Thomas.

That is the DEFINITION of weaponizing the FBI and DOJ. You can’t get Thomas so instead you target his wife over something absurdly ridiculous in an attempt to get to Thomas.

 

Of course, if this woman was Ginny Whogivesafuq, there would be less interest, and a nobody like that would be ignored by any official she may have contacted about the election. However, it ain't Ginny Whogivesafuq, is it. It is the political activist Wife of a SCOTUS, a bloke into whose ear she is whispering sweet nothings each evening. So, the questions are obvious.

Would you not be at least interested if POTUS was married to a well known Russian spy? Would you have no concerns about what influence she has on that POTUS and his decisions. Think along those lines and review your position, and of great relevance in the curious case of this Ginny is that she is a blatantly dishonest delusional wanker whack job.

 

What is she 'accused' of? Did the DOJ open an indictment against her? Do they even have her as a person of interest? Was she there at the rally? But to be blunt, the whole 'overturn the election' mantra has become more of a mantra, then an actual reality. People would LOVE to overturn the election, knowing what we know now. In reality, what we have is that stooge sitting there as President and the only opportunity legally and lawfully available to us is November 2024, and you can bet I'm voting for whoever and any nominee but the incumbent.

 

She received money for the Heritage Foundation that she didnt report in the early 2000’s. And she still is active with the group. She was also texting Mark Meadows to overturn the election.

Now because of who she is, and who her husband is, this goes beyond “ethics” and “conflict of interest”. This stinks to high heaven.

You seriously cant think that the wife of a SCOTUS justice has no input , or sway over what/how her husband rules on, and how he rules do you ?

But honestly, if your OK with that, then we as American citizens would be able to protest directly at their houses right ? Because that law exists to STOP the people fro swaying the opinion of a SCOTUS because they are supposed to rule based on the law, not in ideology right ?

 

Just because a few true patriots stood up to save our democracy, does not mean it wasn't perilously close to being overridden….its not a “mantra”, its a warning that we DID come close to loosing our democracy, and if we don’t punish those who did this, the next time it happens, and it will happen if their are no consequences to trying, it may actually succeed.

Are you OK with that ?