January 6 Committee has exceeded expectations.

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Golem, Jul 25, 2022.

  1. Natty Bumpo

    Natty Bumpo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    41,209
    Likes Received:
    14,703
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It sounds paranoid, but for many weird worshipers it's all about Trump, of course.

    Personally, I have little interest whether the whiner is ever indicted, prosecuted, and convicted in any of his various antics that are under investigation.

    The revelation of truth and securing our democratic system against those who try to destroy it is paramount, however.

    We can't have sore losers in every election inciting goons to attack the Capitol by spewing

    Screen Shot 2022-09-27 at 9.34.01 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 12.44.33 PM.png
     
  2. ShadowX

    ShadowX Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2014
    Messages:
    12,949
    Likes Received:
    6,727
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well I’m highly confident that the lefts reaction on Jan 6 2024 to Trump getting elected will make Jan 6 2020 look like Romper Room. We shall see how you feel then.
     
  3. Lee Atwater

    Lee Atwater Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2017
    Messages:
    45,403
    Likes Received:
    26,532
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I see them as inextricable, but that's just me.
     
  4. ShadowX

    ShadowX Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2014
    Messages:
    12,949
    Likes Received:
    6,727
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Of course you would because if he’s guilty of what you claim, why wouldn’t he be indicted? Lol
     
  5. Natty Bumpo

    Natty Bumpo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    41,209
    Likes Received:
    14,703
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Please provide your list of individuals being charged with "treason" by any Republican senator, congressman, or prosecutor.

    Do you believe they are all shirking their sworn duty to protect the nation against enemies foreign and domestic?

    You can also enumerate all refutations of the revelations provided by all those Republican officeholders and Trump regime insiders under oath.
     
  6. Natty Bumpo

    Natty Bumpo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    41,209
    Likes Received:
    14,703
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Last edited: Sep 27, 2022
  7. ShadowX

    ShadowX Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2014
    Messages:
    12,949
    Likes Received:
    6,727
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sure. Evidence trump called for 10,000 troops and told Chris Miller to “Do whatever he has to do” to protect the Capitol.

    “On the afternoon of January 5, I received a call from the President in connection with a rally by his supporters that day at Freedom Plaza. The President asked if I was watching the event on television. I replied that I had seen coverage of the event. He then commented that “they” were going to need 10,000 troops the following day. The call lasted fewer than thirty seconds and I did not respond substantively, and there was no elaboration. I took his comment to mean that a large force would be required to maintain order the following day. At the time, I had been advised by our domestic law enforcement partners that based on their experience with protests and crowd control, as well as their intelligence information, that they were confident that they had sufficient personnel assigned to maintain order. ”

    https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/Miller Testimony.pdf

    Evidence exculpatory in nature which they refused to present. The committee is a fraud.
     
    Last edited: Sep 27, 2022
  8. Natty Bumpo

    Natty Bumpo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    41,209
    Likes Received:
    14,703
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Trump never ordered troops to defend the Capitol from his goons' attack. As he has stated, he loves them and hopes to pardon them.

     
  9. Lee Atwater

    Lee Atwater Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2017
    Messages:
    45,403
    Likes Received:
    26,532
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    "The revelation of truth and securing our democratic system against those who try to destroy it is paramount, however."

    Bringing to account those who try to destroy democracy is, IMO, an essential component in protecting it.
     
  10. Par10

    Par10 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2019
    Messages:
    4,230
    Likes Received:
    3,736
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    To sum it up:

    1- Legislative: Nothing

    2- Criminal: the committee has no power to prosecute.

    3- Informational: Lots of: heard it from a friend who, heard it from a friend who, heard it from a another you been messin' around
     
  11. Natty Bumpo

    Natty Bumpo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    41,209
    Likes Received:
    14,703
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If so, where were they? Did the National Guard flagrantly ignore a presidential order?

    Why is no one, not even one Trumpy senator or congressman, calling for courts martial?
     
  12. Natty Bumpo

    Natty Bumpo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    41,209
    Likes Received:
    14,703
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Criminal prosecution of a disposed-of POTUS is a formidable challenge.

    Albeit desirable, it must be acknowledged that the guilty can escape conviction, and then falsely insist that not being found guilty establishes innocence.
    The eagerness and gullibility of hyper-partisans to actually accept such a falsehood can perpetuate the contempt for America they espouse.
     
  13. Lee Atwater

    Lee Atwater Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2017
    Messages:
    45,403
    Likes Received:
    26,532
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Absolutely. All it takes is one member of The Following, who have established the truth is meaningless to them when it conflicts with the blind allegiance, to infiltrate the jury. The stakes are no doubt high. But James, Willis, Garland, are doing what is necessary.
     
    Last edited: Sep 27, 2022
  14. RodB

    RodB Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    22,360
    Likes Received:
    11,141
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It obviously was set up and runs unabashedly as a partisan effort. Party affiliation has little to do with it other than coincidence.
     
  15. Natty Bumpo

    Natty Bumpo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    41,209
    Likes Received:
    14,703
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Death threats targeting the Attorney General, a federal judge, and public servants recovering classified documents in the interest of national security are tributes to their integrity, and declarations of contempt for the United States.

    The lies spewed at loser grievance jamborees get them wee wee'd up, just as the inability to accept the result of a democratic election had them assaulting outnumbered police and eager to hang the Vice president.

    They are especially naughty boys.
     
  16. Natty Bumpo

    Natty Bumpo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    41,209
    Likes Received:
    14,703
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So what if the vast majority of witnesses providing revelatory sworn testimony are Republicans?

    That would have been the case even if the minority leader had not withdrawn all his proposed Republicans that had been deemed acceptable.
     
  17. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,325
    Likes Received:
    38,994
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It's not a belief it's a fact and YOU support her running as her own. There have been no major revelations by the committee but they have spouted long debunked misinformation and even tried to change some of the emails and then purposely edited Trumps speech that day to try and give it a phony slant.
     
    RodB likes this.
  18. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,325
    Likes Received:
    38,994
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    ROFLMAO the Republicans didn't need to try to delegitimize it Pelosi and Thompson et all did that all on their own.
     
  19. RodB

    RodB Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    22,360
    Likes Received:
    11,141
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    If you believe there are no Republicans who are strongly partisan against Trump, you haven't been paying attention. The only Republicans on the partisan committee are purposely avid partisan never Trumpers.
     
  20. ShadowX

    ShadowX Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2014
    Messages:
    12,949
    Likes Received:
    6,727
    Trophy Points:
    113
    **** those fact checks lol That is sworn testimony from Chris Miller to the House Oversight committee that says he did state that.
     
  21. Natty Bumpo

    Natty Bumpo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    41,209
    Likes Received:
    14,703
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The committee's members' party affiliation is of little consequence.

    It is the sworn testimony of so many Republican officeholders and Trump regime insiders that provides us with the truth.
     
  22. Natty Bumpo

    Natty Bumpo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    41,209
    Likes Received:
    14,703
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So, again, if the National Guard defied a presidential order, where are the RINOs of Trumpery calling for courts martial?
     
  23. Natty Bumpo

    Natty Bumpo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    41,209
    Likes Received:
    14,703
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Of course there are many Americans who strongly oppose Trump - Democrats, Independents, and Republicans. They defeated him by over seven million votes.

    I have seen no evidence that all the Republican officeholders and Trump regime insiders who provided sworn testimony before the Committee are all "Never-Trumpers."
    Those who stated their presidential preference in the 2020 election indicated that they had supported him.
     
  24. ShadowX

    ShadowX Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2014
    Messages:
    12,949
    Likes Received:
    6,727
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They didn’t defy a presidential order. If you’d read the testimony it says that trump gave them FULL AUTHORITY to use whatever defensive measures they needed.

    They made the decision not to use them because as Miller said their discussions with local law enforcement and other made them believe they would have enough to defend the Capitol.

    However the fact remains Donald Trump gave the affirmative for a defense of the Capitol. To assert he’s then going to assault it with 2000 people is the height of preposterous.

    Furthermore nowhere did that fraudulent sham of a committee present this testimony to the public. Why? Because it would make their case look bad and they were ONLY willing to present evidence that made their case look good. That’s not an investigation that’s a corrupt sham of a public show trial to attempt to convict in the court of public opinion because they can’t convict in a court of law.
     
    Last edited: Sep 27, 2022
  25. RodB

    RodB Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    22,360
    Likes Received:
    11,141
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
     

Share This Page