Global Warming -- LOL

Methane: Much Ado About Nothing
2022 › 11 › 19 › methane-much-ado-about-nothing
But what of methane which is the excuse du jour for wrecking livelihoods ... livelihoods, towns, industries and whole economies? Methane, with a half life of nine years in the atmopshere . . .

 

We could sure use a little of that 'global warming' today!

 

Meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow! lol

 

Where's that "global warming" when we need it?

 

If you've seen snow at any time of your life that means its a hoax right.

 

Data fiddling down under.
The On-Going Case for Abandoning Homogenization of Australian Temperature Data
Guest Blogger
Australian’s are being misled by data-wranglers, climate-modelers and institutions they should be able to trust. Read on …

 

Doomsday has (again) been postponed.


Finally, some good news from climate scientists

The runaway collapse of the West Antarctic ice sheet is not "inevitable," scientists said Monday following research that tracked the region's recent response to climate change.

 

Well, since guest bloggers have convinced you the Earth is cooling, in contradiction to the science, I can see why you're not concerned.

 

". . . Their study, published in the journal Nature Communications, concluded that this slowdown was caused by changes in ocean temperatures that were caused by offshore winds, with pronounced differences in the impact depending on the region.

Researchers said that this raises questions about how rising temperatures will affect the Antarctic, with ocean and atmospheric conditions playing a key role.

"That means that ice-sheet collapse is not inevitable," said co-author Professor Eric Steig from the University of Washington in Seattle. . . . "

 

Very cold day. Fingers crossed thjat some of that "global warming" will hurry up and get here!

 

Climate Scientists Using Grossly Simplified, Deplorably Unrealistic Models And Assumptions
By P Gosselin on 18. January 2023

Share this...
Climate science stance amounts to a gross misrepresentation of reality

The DIY way to demystify “greenhouse gas” claims
By Fred F. Mueller
Part 2



Fig. 1. The sun and the clouds – here a thin cover of high clouds and some aviation chemtrails – are the main driving forces for the energy fluxes determining our climate. The “greenhouse gases” are – if ever – just a minor factor.

In Part 1, we looked at the deplorable tendency of climate doomsayers to reduce the factual complexity and variability of parameters influencing our climate by focusing on a single aspect – the so-called “greenhouse gases” – and among these on the declared most odious villain: CO2. Its content in the atmosphere is declared to be the one and only factor 1) that determines our climate and hence earth’s temperature.

The efficiency of this one parameter is attributed to the power to restrain the currently positive planet-wide temperature trend to within + 1.5 °C, thus urging politicians to set a residual CO2 budget 2) of 400 billion tonnes subdivided and allocated to each nation within narrow allowances. These national budgets are then again subdivided and enforced onto the different sectors of industry and the population with grave consequences for the welfare of society, e.g. cement and metal production, building and heating standards or private car use.

Any other variables affecting the energy budget of our planet such as water vapor, actually a much more potent “greenhouse gas” than CO2, are simply ignored by treating them either as constants or as mere amplifying factors. The influence of clouds – the other aggregate states of water in the atmosphere – is simply and willfully suppressed. . . .

 

"Don't question the science" is the most anti science statement ever uttered.

 

When I bring up Leonard Nemoy the climate alarmists have nothing to say.

 

Climate change is evidenced over the history of the planet. Only a fool would say that it doesn’t exist?

 

Fudging temperatures in Australia.
Hyping Daily Maximum Temperatures (Part 1)

January 19, 2023


There is more than one way to ruin a perfectly good historical temperature record. The Australian Bureau of Meteorology achieves this in multiple ways, primarily through industrial scale remodelling (also known as homogenisation – stripping away the … [Read more...]

 

Includes a great cartoon.
“Then a Miracle Occurs…”
Guest Blogger
Scotland’s “Energy Strategy and Just Transition plan” is a disaster in the making. . . .

 

Australians may lead the world in poor decisions.

Rapid technological innovation – not harmful renewables policy – key to lighting our energy future
Posted on January 20, 2023 by curryja | 38 comments
by Judith Curry

Framework for a robust transition of our energy systems.

Continue reading →
Here is the text of my latest oped for Australia’s Sky News:

Australia’s rapid transition of electric power systems away from fossil fuels is introducing substantial new risks to their electric power systems. A transition of the electric power system that produces less reliable and more expensive electricity acts as a tourniquet that restricts the lifeblood of modern society. . . .

 

https://wottsupwiththat.com/

 

Your link is six years old and off topic. Meanwhile, please note the links within the WUWT post:
"Former weather observer and NSW Department of Natural Resources research scientist.

Under the guise of data homogenization, Bureau of Meteorology scientist Blair Trewin changes data to agree with models. Groomed by the BoM, CSIRO and high-ranking university professors to believe the world is warming, Australian’s are being misled by data-wranglers, climate-modelers and institutions they should be able to trust. Read on …
www.comwatch.com.au

Commencing with a methods case-study of Parafield airport near Adelaide, South Australia, the latest series of www.bomwatch.com.au reports investigate how senior scientists within Australia’s Bureau of Meteorology (BoM), most recently Blair Trewin, massage Australian temperature data to produce trends that that are unrelated to the climate. . . . "

 

What was the CO2 level in 1978 and what was it in 2022?

How far back before 1978 do you have to go to find 400 ppm of CO2 in the atmosphere?

 

What are human beings doing to cause Solar Coronal Mass Ejections?

I know, mount really big rockets on the Earth so we can dodge them.

 

January 19, 2023
The California Drought is Over. Definitively.

After over a month of torrential rain and massive mountain snow, the drought is over in California.

Yet with all the liquid bounty, some in the media and elsewhere don't want to give up on it, as noted in the NY Times headline below.


And the U.S Drought Monitor has severe drought over much of the state.


I believe the evidence for the end of California drought is quite overwhelming. But consider the facts found below and decide for yourself. . . .